Literature DB >> 28861654

Breast Cancer Screening for Patients of Rural Accountable Care Organization Clinics: A Multi-Level Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators.

Hongmei Wang1, Abbey Gregg2, Fang Qiu3, Jungyoon Kim2, Baojiang Chen4, Neng Wan5, Dejun Su6, Tzeyu Michaud6, Li-Wu Chen2.   

Abstract

Not all women 50-74 years received biennial mammography and the situation is worse in rural areas. Accountable care organizations (ACO) emphasize coordinated care, use of electronic health system, and preventive quality measures and these practices may improve their patients' breast cancer screening rate. Using medical record data of 8,347 women patients aged 50-74 years from eight rural ACO clinics in Nebraska, this study examined patient-, provider-, and county-level barriers and facilitators for breast cancer screening. A generalized estimating equations model was used to account for the correlation among patients from the same provider and county. The multi-level logistic regression results suggest that uninsured non-Hispanic Black patients were less likely to meet the biennial mammography screening guideline. Patients whose preferred language being English, having a preventive visit in the past 12 months, having one or more chronic conditions were more likely to meet the biennial mammography screening guideline. Patients with a primary care provider (PCP) that was male, without a medical doctor degree were less likely to screen biennially. Patients with a PCP that reviewed performance report quarterly, or manually checked patients' mammography screening status during visits were more likely to screen biennially. Interestingly, patients whose PCP reported being reminded by a care coordination team were less likely to screen biennially. Patients living in counties with more PCPs were also more likely to screen biennially. The study findings suggest that efforts targeting individual and practice-level barriers could be most effective in improving mammography screening for these rural ACO patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accountable Care Organizations; Barriers; Cancer screening; Mammography; Rural

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28861654     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-017-0412-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  28 in total

1.  Association of Pioneer Accountable Care Organizations vs traditional Medicare fee for service with spending, utilization, and patient experience.

Authors:  David J Nyweide; Woolton Lee; Timothy T Cuerdon; Hoangmai H Pham; Megan Cox; Rahul Rajkumar; Patrick H Conway
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Promoting colorectal cancer screening through a new model of delivering rural primary care in the USA: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jungyoon Kim; Lufei Young; Sarbinaz Bekmuratova; Daniel J Schober; Hongmei Wang; Shreya Roy; Soumitra S Bhuyan; Alice Schumaker; Li-Wu Chen
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  Physician and patient gender concordance and the delivery of comprehensive clinical preventive services.

Authors:  Susan A Flocke; Valerie Gilchrist
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Association of contextual factors and breast cancer screening: finding new targets to promote early detection.

Authors:  David Litaker; Anne Tomolo
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 5.  Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors.

Authors:  Sue Horrocks; Elizabeth Anderson; Chris Salisbury
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

6.  Physician gender bias in clinical decisionmaking: screening for cancer in primary care.

Authors:  P Franks; C M Clancy
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Association of area socioeconomic status and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandi L Pruitt; Matthew J Shim; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Sally W Vernon; Benjamin C Amick
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Effect of area poverty rate on cancer screening across US communities.

Authors:  Mario Schootman; Donna B Jeffe; Elizabeth A Baker; Mark S Walker
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Cancer screening adherence: does physician-patient communication matter?

Authors:  Sarah A Fox; John Heritage; Susan E Stockdale; Steven M Asch; Naihua Duan; Steven P Reise
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-02-27

10.  Access to mammography screening in a large urban population: a multi-level analysis.

Authors:  Stephen C Meersman; Nancy Breen; Linda W Pickle; Helen I Meissner; Paul Simon
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 2.506

View more
  2 in total

1.  Implementation of cancer screening in rural primary care practices after joining an accountable care organisation: a multiple case study.

Authors:  Heather Nelson-Brantley; Edward F Ellerbeck; Stacy McCrea-Robertson; Jennifer Brull; Jennifer Bacani McKenney; K Allen Greiner; Christie Befort
Journal:  Fam Med Community Health       Date:  2021-12

2.  Breast and cervical cancer screening adherence in Jiangsu, China: An ecological perspective.

Authors:  Yanjun Sun; Yuhao Ma; Menghan Cao; Zhiqing Hu; Wei Lin; Mingsheng Chen; Yuan He
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.