Jungyoon Kim1, Lufei Young2, Sarbinaz Bekmuratova3, Daniel J Schober4, Hongmei Wang5, Shreya Roy6, Soumitra S Bhuyan7, Alice Schumaker8, Li-Wu Chen9. 1. University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha NE 68198 USA. jungyoon.kim@unmc.edu. 2. Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912 USA. luyoung@augusta.edu. 3. University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha NE 68198 USA. Sarbinaz.bekmuratova@unmc.edu. 4. DePaul University Chicago IL 60614 USA. dschober@depaul.edu. 5. University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha NE 68198 USA. hongmeiwang@unmc.edu. 6. University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha NE 68198 USA. shreya.roy@unmc.edu. 7. University of Memphis, 3720 Alumni Ave, Memphis,TN, 38152. sbhuran@memphis.edu. 8. University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha NE 68198 USA. amschumaker@unmc.edu. 9. University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha NE 68198 USA. liwuchen@unmc.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Despite the known benefits of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, rural areas have consistently reported lower screening rates than their urban counterparts. Alternative healthcare delivery models, such as accountable care organizations (ACOs), have the potential to increase CRC rates through collaboration among healthcare providers with the aim of improving quality and decreasing cost. However, researchers have not sufficiently explored how this innovative model could influence the promotion of cancer screening. The purpose of the study was to explore the mechanism of how CRC screening can be promoted in ACO-participating rural primary care clinics. METHODS: The study collected qualitative data from in-depth interviews with 21 healthcare professionals employed in ACO-participating primary care clinics in rural Nebraska. Participants were asked about their views on opportunities and challenges to promote CRC screening in an ACO context. Data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: The study found that the new healthcare delivery model can offer opportunities to promote cancer screening in rural areas through enhanced electronic health record use, information sharing and collaborative learning within ACO networks, use of standardized quality measures and performance feedback, a shift to preventive/comprehensive care, adoption of team-based care, and empowered care coordinators. The perceived challenges were found in financial instability, increased staff workload, lack of provider training/education, and lack of resources in rural areas. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the innovative care delivery model, ACO, could provide a well-designed platform for promoting CRC screening in rural areas, if sustainable resources (eg finance, health providers, and education) are provided. This study provides 'practical' information to identify effective and sustainable intervention programs to promote preventive screening. Further efforts are needed to facilitate delivery system reforms in rural primary care, such as improving performance evaluation measures and methods.
INTRODUCTION: Despite the known benefits of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, rural areas have consistently reported lower screening rates than their urban counterparts. Alternative healthcare delivery models, such as accountable care organizations (ACOs), have the potential to increase CRC rates through collaboration among healthcare providers with the aim of improving quality and decreasing cost. However, researchers have not sufficiently explored how this innovative model could influence the promotion of cancer screening. The purpose of the study was to explore the mechanism of how CRC screening can be promoted in ACO-participating rural primary care clinics. METHODS: The study collected qualitative data from in-depth interviews with 21 healthcare professionals employed in ACO-participating primary care clinics in rural Nebraska. Participants were asked about their views on opportunities and challenges to promote CRC screening in an ACO context. Data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: The study found that the new healthcare delivery model can offer opportunities to promote cancer screening in rural areas through enhanced electronic health record use, information sharing and collaborative learning within ACO networks, use of standardized quality measures and performance feedback, a shift to preventive/comprehensive care, adoption of team-based care, and empowered care coordinators. The perceived challenges were found in financial instability, increased staff workload, lack of provider training/education, and lack of resources in rural areas. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the innovative care delivery model, ACO, could provide a well-designed platform for promoting CRC screening in rural areas, if sustainable resources (eg finance, health providers, and education) are provided. This study provides 'practical' information to identify effective and sustainable intervention programs to promote preventive screening. Further efforts are needed to facilitate delivery system reforms in rural primary care, such as improving performance evaluation measures and methods.
Entities:
Keywords:
Administrator; Cancer; Health Service reform; Management/Administration; Medical; North America; Nursing; Qualitative Research
Authors: Trace Heavener; Frank W McStay; Victoria Jaeger; Kristen Stephenson; Lauren Sager; James Sing Journal: Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) Date: 2019-08-21