Susan A Flocke1, Valerie Gilchrist. 1. Department of Family Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7136, USA. susan.flocke@case.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding the role of patient- and physician-gender on delivery of preventive services has important implications for identifying strategies to increase preventive service delivery. We attempt to overcome methodological limitations of previous studies in examining the association of the patient-physician gender interaction on the delivery of preventive screening, counseling, and immunization services. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, research nurses directly observed 3256 consecutive adult patient visits to 138 family physicians. Delivery of gender neutral US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended screening, health behavior counseling, and immunization services was assessed by direct observation and medical record review. Multilevel regression analyses were used to test the interaction effect of physician and patient gender with preventive service delivery, controlling for patient age, insurance type, number of office visits in the past 2 years and physician age. RESULTS: The interaction effect of physician and patient gender was not significantly associated with delivery of gender neutral screening, counseling, or immunizations. Patients of female physicians were more up-to-date on counseling services (P < 0.01) and immunizations (P < 0.05) than patients of male physicians. Male patients, independent of physician gender, were more up-to-date on counseling and immunizations (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Physician-patient gender concordance is not associated with delivery of more preventive services. Rather, female physicians provide more counseling and immunization services to all of their patients. Previous research showing higher rates of gender-specific screening achieved by women physicians may have been an indication of an overall greater prevention orientation among women physicians rather than a specific benefit of gender concordance.
BACKGROUND: Understanding the role of patient- and physician-gender on delivery of preventive services has important implications for identifying strategies to increase preventive service delivery. We attempt to overcome methodological limitations of previous studies in examining the association of the patient-physician gender interaction on the delivery of preventive screening, counseling, and immunization services. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, research nurses directly observed 3256 consecutive adult patient visits to 138 family physicians. Delivery of gender neutral US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended screening, health behavior counseling, and immunization services was assessed by direct observation and medical record review. Multilevel regression analyses were used to test the interaction effect of physician and patient gender with preventive service delivery, controlling for patient age, insurance type, number of office visits in the past 2 years and physician age. RESULTS: The interaction effect of physician and patient gender was not significantly associated with delivery of gender neutral screening, counseling, or immunizations. Patients of female physicians were more up-to-date on counseling services (P < 0.01) and immunizations (P < 0.05) than patients of male physicians. Male patients, independent of physician gender, were more up-to-date on counseling and immunizations (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Physician-patient gender concordance is not associated with delivery of more preventive services. Rather, female physicians provide more counseling and immunization services to all of their patients. Previous research showing higher rates of gender-specific screening achieved by women physicians may have been an indication of an overall greater prevention orientation among women physicians rather than a specific benefit of gender concordance.
Authors: Simone Dahrouge; William E Hogg; Grant Russell; Meltem Tuna; Robert Geneau; Laura K Muldoon; Elizabeth Kristjansson; John Fletcher Journal: CMAJ Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Joyce W Tang; Robert F Kushner; Kenzie A Cameron; Brent Hicks; Andrew J Cooper; David W Baker Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-03-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Deirdre A Shires; Kurt C Stange; George Divine; Scott Ratliff; Ronak Vashi; Ming Tai-Seale; Jennifer Elston Lafata Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Paul K J Han; Sarah Kobrin; Nancy Breen; Djenaba A Joseph; Jun Li; Dominick L Frosch; Carrie N Klabunde Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Judith M E Walsh; René Salazar; Celia Kaplan; Lamkieu Nguyen; Jimmy Hwang; Rena J Pasick Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.037