Literature DB >> 19815634

Association of area socioeconomic status and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.

Sandi L Pruitt1, Matthew J Shim, Patricia Dolan Mullen, Sally W Vernon, Benjamin C Amick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although numerous studies have examined the association of area socioeconomic status (SES) and cancer screening after controlling for individual SES, findings have been inconsistent. A systematic review of existing studies is timely to identify conceptual and methodologic limitations and to provide a basis for future research directions and policy.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives were to (a) describe the study designs, constructs, methods, and measures; (b) describe the independent association of area SES and cancer screening; and (c) identify neglected areas of research.
METHODS: We searched six electronic databases and manually searched cited and citing articles. Eligible studies were published before 2008 in peer-reviewed journals in English, represented primary data on individuals ages > or = 18 years from developed countries, and measured the association of area and individual SES with breast, cervical, or colorectal cancer screening.
RESULTS: Of 19 eligible studies, most measured breast cancer screening. Studies varied widely in research design, definitions, and measures of SES, cancer screening behaviors, and covariates. Eight employed multilevel logistic regression, whereas the remainder analyzed data with standard single-level logistic regression. The majority measured one or two indicators of area and individual SES; common indicators at both levels were poverty, income, and education. There was no consistent pattern in the association between area SES and cancer screening. DISCUSSION: The gaps and conceptual and methodologic heterogeneity in the literature to date limit definitive conclusions about an underlying association between area SES and cancer screening. We identify five areas of research deserving greater attention in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19815634      PMCID: PMC2760038          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  96 in total

1.  Re: "Use of census-based aggregate variables to proxy for socioeconomic group: evidence from national samples".

Authors:  G D Smith; C Hart
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  County characteristics and racial and ethnic disparities in the use of preventive services.

Authors:  Maureen R Benjamins; James B Kirby; Stephanie A Bond Huie
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Invited commentary: Beyond the metrics for measuring neighborhood effects.

Authors:  Lynne C Messer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Breast cancer screening among low-income or uninsured women: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, July 1995 to March 2002 (United States).

Authors:  Christie R Eheman; Vicki B Benard; Donald Blackman; Herschel W Lawson; Christa Anderson; William Helsel; Nancy C Lee
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 5.  Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis.

Authors:  R E Slavin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  A multilevel study of socioeconomic predictors of regular mammography use among African-American women.

Authors:  Lynn Rosenberg; Lauren A Wise; Julie R Palmer; Nicholas J Horton; Lucile L Adams-Campbell
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Association of contextual factors and breast cancer screening: finding new targets to promote early detection.

Authors:  David Litaker; Anne Tomolo
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Breast cancer screening and incidence in communities with a high proportion of uninsured.

Authors:  Mario Schootman; Mark S Walker; Donna B Jeffe; James E Rohrer; Elizabeth A Baker
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Race/ethnicity, gender, and monitoring socioeconomic gradients in health: a comparison of area-based socioeconomic measures--the public health disparities geocoding project.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; Pamela D Waterman; David H Rehkopf; S V Subramanian
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Social and physical environments and disparities in risk for cardiovascular disease: the healthy environments partnership conceptual model.

Authors:  Amy J Schulz; Srimathi Kannan; J Timothy Dvonch; Barbara A Israel; Alex Allen; Sherman A James; James S House; James Lepkowski
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  65 in total

1.  Socioeconomic status and hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States.

Authors:  Fatma M Shebl; David E Capo-Ramos; Barry I Graubard; Katherine A McGlynn; Sean F Altekruse
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  The association of social support and education with breast and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Patricia Documet; Todd M Bear; Jason D Flatt; Laura Macia; Jeanette Trauth; Edmund M Ricci
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2014-11-12

3.  Perceived Neighborhood Quality and Cancer Screening Behavior: Evidence from the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin.

Authors:  Kirsten M M Beyer; Kristen M Malecki; Kelly A Hoormann; Aniko Szabo; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-02

Review 4.  Interventions for encouraging sexual behaviours intended to prevent cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan P Shepherd; Geoff K Frampton; Petra Harris
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-04-13

5.  Black Patients with Colorectal Cancer Have More Advanced Cancer Stage at Time of Diagnosis: A Community-Based Safety-Net Hospital Experience.

Authors:  Chuck Chan; Aristeo Lopez; Garland Castaneda; Taft Bhuket; Benny Liu; Stephen Yee; David Irwin; Robert J Wong
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-08

6.  Neighborhood Predictors of Mammography Barriers Among US-Based Latinas.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Jesse J Plascak; Donald L Patrick; Sonia Bishop; Gloria D Coronado; Shirley A A Beresford
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-04-08

7.  Breast Cancer Screening for Patients of Rural Accountable Care Organization Clinics: A Multi-Level Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators.

Authors:  Hongmei Wang; Abbey Gregg; Fang Qiu; Jungyoon Kim; Baojiang Chen; Neng Wan; Dejun Su; Tzeyu Michaud; Li-Wu Chen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-04

8.  HPV Vaccination Coverage Among US Teens Across the Rural-Urban Continuum.

Authors:  Allison L Swiecki-Sikora; Kevin A Henry; Deanna Kepka
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Associations between contextual factors and colorectal cancer screening in a racially and ethnically diverse population in Texas.

Authors:  William A Calo; Sally W Vernon; David R Lairson; Stephen H Linder
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Correlates of colorectal cancer screening among residents of Ohio Appalachia.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Adana A Llanos; Gregory S Young; Michael L Pennell; Chul-joo Lee; Mira L Katz
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.