| Literature DB >> 28860608 |
Ararat Chakhoyan1, Jean-Sebastien Guillamo1,2, Solène Collet1, François Kauffmann3, Nicolas Delcroix4, Emmanuèle Lechapt-Zalcman1,5, Jean-Marc Constans1,6, Edwige Petit1, Eric T MacKenzie1, Louisa Barré7, Myriam Bernaudin1, Omar Touzani1, Samuel Valable8.
Abstract
Quantitative imaging modalities for the analysis of hypoxia in brain tumors are lacking. The objective of this study was to generate absolute maps of tissue ptO2 from [18F]-FMISO images in glioblastoma and less aggressive glioma patients in order to quantitatively assess tumor hypoxia. An ancillary objective was to compare estimated ptO2 values to other biomarkers: perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) and tumor metabolism obtained from 1H-MR mono-voxel spectroscopy (MRS). Ten patients with glioblastoma (GBM) and three patients with less aggressive glioma (nGBM) were enrolled. All patients had [18F]-FMISO and multiparametric MRI (anatomic, PWI, MRS) scans. A non-linear regression was performed to generate ptO2 maps based on normal appearing gray (NAGM) and white matter (NAWM) for each patient. As expected, a marked [18F]-FMISO uptake was observed in GBM patients. The ptO2 based on patient specific calculations was notably low in this group (4.8 ± 1.9 mmHg, p < 0.001) compared to all other groups (nGBM, NAGM and NAWM). The rCBV was increased in GBM (1.4 ± 0.2 when compared to nGBM tumors 0.8 ± 0.4). Lactate (and lipid) concentration increased in GBM (27.8 ± 13.8%) relative to nGBM (p < 0.01). Linear, nonlinear and ROC curve analyses between ptO2 maps, PWI-derived rCBV maps and MRS-derived lipid and lactate concentration strengthens the robustness of our approaches.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28860608 PMCID: PMC5579277 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08646-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(A) Representative axial 3D T1wGd (a), fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) (b), [18F]-FMISO (c), rCBV maps (d), representative absolute ptO2 maps (e) on the basis of the values of (a,b and c), proposed by Toma-Dasu and coll. and adjusted ptO2 (f) maps with empirical approach (non-linear regression) of two glioblastoma (GBM) and one less aggressive glioma (nGBM) patients. (B) 1H-MR mono-voxel spectroscopy was performed (Te = 144 ms) in tumor and/or necrotic tissue as well as non-tumor tissue for the same patients. Spectral peak locations and VOIS: (1) choline, (2) creatine, (3) NAA (N-acetyl aspartate, (4) lactate and (5) lipids. (C) Box plot of T/B ratio and rCBV (D) quantification in NAGM, NAWM and GBM and nGBM tumors areas.
Figure 2Box plot of adjusted ptO2 values (medians and the four quartiles as well as individual results) for each region of interest (NAGM, NAWM, GBM tumor and nGBM tumor) and the corresponding absolute values as mean ± sd (Fig. 2A). Correlation regressions between [18F]-FMISO uptake (T/B ratio), ptO2, rCBV and the lipids and lactate concentration. (B) Non-linear fit between [18F]-FMISO uptake and adjusted ptO2 values. Each point represent a volume of interest (x NAGM | • NAWM | Δ Tumor). (C) Linear fit between rCBV (calculated from PWI-MRI imaging) and ptO2 (estimated form [18F]-FMISO uptake). (D) Non-linear fit between Lactate and lipid [%] (calculated from MRS) and ptO2.
Figure 3ROC curve analyses for discrimination of GBM and nGBM) using rCBV (A), T/B ratio maps (B) and affined ptO2 maps (C). The AUC and ROC threshold (for best sensitivity and specificity) values are reported in each ROC histogram.
Patients and tumor characteristics.
| No | Sex | Age | KP | Tumor Location | CE | T/B | WHO Grade | Histology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 28 | 100 | Parietal, Temporal, Insular, L | Yes | Yes | IV | Glioblastoma |
| 2 | M | 58 | 90 | Temporal, R | Yes | Yes | IV | Glioblastoma |
| 3 | M | 64 | 80 | Frontal, L | Yes | Yes | IV | Glioblastoma |
| 4 | M | 52 | 80 | Frontal, R | Yes | Yes | IV | Glioblastoma |
| 5 | M | 62 | 80 | Occipital, CC, L | Yes | Yes | IV | Glioblastoma |
| 6 | M | 67 | 90 | Temporal, Insular, R | Yes | Yes | IV | Glioblastoma |
| 7 | M | 56 | 70 | Occipital, CC, Temporal, L | Yes | Yes | IV | Glioblastoma |
| 8 | M | 63 | 90 | Frontal, L | Yes | Yes | IV | Glioblastoma |
| 9 | F | 71 | 70 | Parietal, Occipital, R | Yes | Yes | IV | Glioblastoma |
| 10 | M | 46 | 80 | Frontal, CC, R, L | Yes | Yes | IV | Glioblastoma |
| 11 | M | 51 | 100 | Temporal, Insular, R | No | No | III | Oligoastrocytoma |
| 12 | M | 58 | 90 | Hemisphere, R, Brain-stem | Yes | No | III | Gliomatosis |
| 13 | M | 54 | 100 | Frontal, R | No | No | II | Oligodendroglioma |
M: Male, F: Female, KP: Karnofsky’s performance scale, R: Right, L: Left, CC: Corpus callosum. CE: Contrast enhancement after Gadolinium, T/B: Tissue to blood ratio ≥1.2, WHO: World Health Organization.