Literature DB >> 27185374

ACRIN 6684: Assessment of Tumor Hypoxia in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Using 18F-FMISO PET and MRI.

Elizabeth R Gerstner1, Zheng Zhang2, James R Fink3, Mark Muzi3, Lucy Hanna2, Erin Greco2, Melissa Prah4, Kathleen M Schmainda4, Akiva Mintz5, Lale Kostakoglu6, Edward A Eikman7, Benjamin M Ellingson8, Eva-Maria Ratai9, A Gregory Sorensen10, Daniel P Barboriak11, David A Mankoff12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Structural and functional alterations in tumor vasculature are thought to contribute to tumor hypoxia which is a primary driver of malignancy through its negative impact on the efficacy of radiation, immune surveillance, apoptosis, genomic stability, and accelerated angiogenesis. We performed a prospective, multicenter study to test the hypothesis that abnormal tumor vasculature and hypoxia, as measured with MRI and PET, will negatively impact survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Prior to the start of chemoradiation, patients with glioblastoma underwent MRI scans that included dynamic contrast enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion sequences to quantitate tumor cerebral blood volume/flow (CBV/CBF) and vascular permeability (ktrans) as well as 18F-Fluoromisonidazole (18F-FMISO) PET to quantitate tumor hypoxia. ROC analysis and Cox regression models were used to determine the association of imaging variables with progression-free and overall survival.
RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled of which 42 had evaluable imaging data. Higher pretreatment 18F-FMISO SUVpeak (P = 0.048), mean ktrans (P = 0.024), and median ktrans (P = 0.045) were significantly associated with shorter overall survival. Higher pretreatment median ktrans (P = 0.021), normalized RCBV (P = 0.0096), and nCBF (P = 0.038) were significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival. SUVpeak [AUC = 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.59-0.91], nRCBV (AUC = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.89), and nCBF (AUC = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.89) were predictive of survival at 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased tumor perfusion, vascular volume, vascular permeability, and hypoxia are negative prognostic markers in newly diagnosed patients with gioblastoma, and these important physiologic markers can be measured safely and reliably using MRI and 18F-FMISO PET. Clin Cancer Res; 22(20); 5079-86. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27185374      PMCID: PMC5065740          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  35 in total

1.  Efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kenya Murase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: ADC histogram analysis predicts response to bevacizumab treatment.

Authors:  Whitney B Pope; Hyun J Kim; Jing Huo; Jeffry Alger; Matthew S Brown; David Gjertson; Victor Sai; Jonathan R Young; Leena Tekchandani; Timothy Cloughesy; Paul S Mischel; Albert Lai; Phioanh Nghiemphu; Syed Rahmanuddin; Jonathan Goldin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis.

Authors:  L Ostergaard; R M Weisskoff; D A Chesler; C Gyldensted; B R Rosen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Molecular pathways: hypoxia response in immune cells fighting or promoting cancer.

Authors:  Asis Palazón; Julián Aragonés; Aizea Morales-Kastresana; Manuel Ortiz de Landázuri; Ignacio Melero
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Complementary information from magnetic resonance imaging and (18)F-fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography in the assessment of the response to an antiangiogenic treatment in a rat brain tumor model.

Authors:  Samuel Valable; Edwige Petit; Simon Roussel; Léna Marteau; Jérôme Toutain; Didier Divoux; Franck Sobrio; Jérôme Delamare; Louisa Barré; Myriam Bernaudin
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 6.  Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy.

Authors:  Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis stratifies progression-free survival in newly diagnosed bevacizumab-treated glioblastoma.

Authors:  W B Pope; A Lai; R Mehta; H J Kim; J Qiao; J R Young; X Xue; J Goldin; M S Brown; P L Nghiemphu; A Tran; T F Cloughesy
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Characterization of radiolabeled fluoromisonidazole as a probe for hypoxic cells.

Authors:  J S Rasey; Z Grunbaum; S Magee; N J Nelson; P L Olive; R E Durand; K A Krohn
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Improved tumor oxygenation and survival in glioblastoma patients who show increased blood perfusion after cediranib and chemoradiation.

Authors:  Tracy T Batchelor; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Kyrre E Emblem; Dan G Duda; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Matija Snuderl; Marek Ancukiewicz; Pavlina Polaskova; Marco C Pinho; Dominique Jennings; Scott R Plotkin; Andrew S Chi; April F Eichler; Jorg Dietrich; Fred H Hochberg; Christine Lu-Emerson; A John Iafrate; S Percy Ivy; Bruce R Rosen; Jay S Loeffler; Patrick Y Wen; A Greg Sorensen; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Oxygen sensing, hypoxia-inducible factors, and disease pathophysiology.

Authors:  Gregg L Semenza
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 23.472

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Standard and Advanced Imaging for the Management of Brain Malignancies From a Radiation Oncology Standpoint.

Authors:  Robert H Press; Jim Zhong; Saumya S Gurbani; Brent D Weinberg; Bree R Eaton; Hyunsuk Shim; Hui-Kuo G Shu
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Performance of Standardized Relative CBV for Quantifying Regional Histologic Tumor Burden in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: Comparison against Normalized Relative CBV Using Image-Localized Stereotactic Biopsies.

Authors:  J M Hoxworth; J M Eschbacher; A C Gonzales; K W Singleton; G D Leon; K A Smith; A M Stokes; Y Zhou; G L Mazza; A B Porter; M M Mrugala; R S Zimmerman; B R Bendok; D P Patra; C Krishna; J L Boxerman; L C Baxter; K R Swanson; C C Quarles; K M Schmainda; L S Hu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Analyzing magnetic resonance imaging data from glioma patients using deep learning.

Authors:  Bjoern Menze; Fabian Isensee; Roland Wiest; Bene Wiestler; Klaus Maier-Hein; Mauricio Reyes; Spyridon Bakas
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  [18F]-FMISO PET study of hypoxia in gliomas before surgery: correlation with molecular markers of hypoxia and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Lien Bekaert; Samuel Valable; Emmanuèle Lechapt-Zalcman; Keven Ponte; Solène Collet; Jean-Marc Constans; Guénaëlle Levallet; Karim Bordji; Edwige Petit; Pierre Branger; Evelyne Emery; Alain Manrique; Louisa Barré; Myriam Bernaudin; Jean-Sébastien Guillamo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Future cancer research priorities in the USA: a Lancet Oncology Commission.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Jaffee; Chi Van Dang; David B Agus; Brian M Alexander; Kenneth C Anderson; Alan Ashworth; Anna D Barker; Roshan Bastani; Sangeeta Bhatia; Jeffrey A Bluestone; Otis Brawley; Atul J Butte; Daniel G Coit; Nancy E Davidson; Mark Davis; Ronald A DePinho; Robert B Diasio; Giulio Draetta; A Lindsay Frazier; Andrew Futreal; Sam S Gambhir; Patricia A Ganz; Levi Garraway; Stanton Gerson; Sumit Gupta; James Heath; Ruth I Hoffman; Cliff Hudis; Chanita Hughes-Halbert; Ramy Ibrahim; Hossein Jadvar; Brian Kavanagh; Rick Kittles; Quynh-Thu Le; Scott M Lippman; David Mankoff; Elaine R Mardis; Deborah K Mayer; Kelly McMasters; Neal J Meropol; Beverly Mitchell; Peter Naredi; Dean Ornish; Timothy M Pawlik; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Martin G Pomper; Derek Raghavan; Christine Ritchie; Sally W Schwarz; Richard Sullivan; Richard Wahl; Jedd D Wolchok; Sandra L Wong; Alfred Yung
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Imaging of brain oxygenation with magnetic resonance imaging: A validation with positron emission tomography in the healthy and tumoural brain.

Authors:  Samuel Valable; Aurélien Corroyer-Dulmont; Ararat Chakhoyan; Lucile Durand; Jérôme Toutain; Didier Divoux; Louisa Barré; Eric T MacKenzie; Edwige Petit; Myriam Bernaudin; Omar Touzani; Emmanuel L Barbier
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 7.  An Update on the Approach to the Imaging of Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Katherine M Mullen; Raymond Y Huang
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 8.  Quantitative Imaging in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; David A Mankoff; Lawrence H Schwartz; Frank S Lieberman; John M Buatti; James M Mountz; Bradley J Erickson; Fiona M M Fennessy; Wei Huang; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Richard L Wahl; Hannah M Linden; Paul E Kinahan; Binsheng Zhao; Nola M Hylton; Robert J Gillies; Laurence Clarke; Robert Nordstrom; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Consensus recommendations for a dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocol for use in high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Jerrold L Boxerman; Chad C Quarles; Leland S Hu; Bradley J Erickson; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Marion Smits; Timothy J Kaufmann; Daniel P Barboriak; Raymond H Huang; Wolfgang Wick; Michael Weller; Evanthia Galanis; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Lalitha Shankar; Paula Jacobs; Caroline Chung; Martin J van den Bent; Susan Chang; W K Al Yung; Timothy F Cloughesy; Patrick Y Wen; Mark R Gilbert; Bruce R Rosen; Benjamin M Ellingson; Kathleen M Schmainda
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Hypoxia-activated evofosfamide for treatment of recurrent bevacizumab-refractory glioblastoma: a phase I surgical study.

Authors:  Andrew Brenner; Richard Zuniga; Jessica D Sun; John Floyd; Charles P Hart; Stew Kroll; Lisa Fichtel; David Cavazos; Laura Caflisch; Aleksandra Gruslova; Shiliang Huang; Yichu Liu; Alessia Lodi; Stefano Tiziani
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.