| Literature DB >> 26347870 |
Aurélien Corroyer-Dulmont1, Ararat Chakhoyan1, Solène Collet1, Lucile Durand1, Eric T MacKenzie1, Edwige Petit1, Myriam Bernaudin1, Omar Touzani1, Samuel Valable1.
Abstract
Hypoxia, the result of an inadequacy between a disorganized and functionally impaired vasculature and the metabolic demand of tumor cells, is a feature of glioblastoma. Hypoxia promotes the aggressiveness of these tumors and, equally, negatively correlates with a decrease in outcome. Tools to characterize oxygen status are essential for the therapeutic management of patients with glioblastoma (i) to refine prognosis, (ii) to adapt the treatment regimen, and (iii) to assess the therapeutic efficacy. While methods that are focal and invasive in nature are of limited use, non-invasive imaging technologies have been developed. Each of these technologies is characterized by its singular advantages and limitations in terms of oxygenation status in glioblastoma. The aim of this short review is, first, to focus on the interest to characterize hypoxia for a better therapeutic management of patients and, second, to discuss recent and pertinent approaches for the assessment of oxygenation/hypoxia and their direct implication for patient care.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; PET; glioblastoma; hypoxia; multimodal imaging
Year: 2015 PMID: 26347870 PMCID: PMC4541402 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2015.00057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1Schematic representation of the negative role of hypoxia in tumor growth and therapeutic response in glioblastoma. The growth of a GBM is a feed-forward (vicious) cycle exacerbated by hypoxia as depicted in red. Hypoxia renders the tumor less susceptible to standard chemo-(CT) and radio-therapy (X-ray) as shown in blue. Future treatment strategies are indicated in purple.
Methodological approaches to evaluate oxygenation in glioblastoma: advantages and limitations.
| Advantages | Limitations | |
|---|---|---|
| Immunohistochemistry | Routinely performed in neuropathology labs | Indirect assessment of ptO2 |
| Invasive and localized | ||
| Probes | Direct and quantitative assessment of ptO2 | Invasive and localized |
| Low reproducibility | ||
| Consumption of oxygen (for Eppendorf probes) | ||
| NIRS | Setup and application in clinical routine are easy | Indirect assessment of ptO2 |
| No contrast agent injection | Superficial and regional | |
| qBOLD | Setup and application in clinical routine are easy | Indirect assessment of ptO2 |
| Whole brain characterization | Specificity for hypoxia needs to be validated | |
| Sensitive | ||
| [19F]-MRI | Direct and quantitative assessment of ptO2 | Needs contrast agent injection potentially toxic |
| Needs 19F coil (not easy for clinic application) | ||
| Relatively low spatial resolution | ||
| EPR imaging | Direct and quantitative assessment of ptO2 | Localized (for EPR) |
| Whole brain characterization | Very low spatial resolution | |
| No studies in brain tumors | ||
| MOBILE | Whole brain characterization | Indirect and relative assessment of ptO2 |
| No studies in brain tumors | ||
| Bioluminescence imaging | Indicator of cellular hypoxia | Needs genetically engineered tumor cells |
| Not applicable for patients | ||
| 15Oxygen | Whole brain characterization | Administration of a gaseous radioactive contrast agent |
| No linear relation between oxygen consumption and cellular hypoxia | ||
| [62Cu]/[64Cu]-ATSM | Characterization of moderate hypoxia | Injection of a radioactive contrast agent |
| Whole brain characterization | Long half-life (12.7 h) | |
| Specificity for hypoxia is discussed | ||
| [18F]-FMISO | Indicator of cellular hypoxia | Injection of a radioactive contrast agent |
| Particularly adapted to radiation therapy modulation | Relative long time before steady-state acquisition (2 h) | |
| Whole brain characterization | ||
| [18F]-FAZA | Indicator of cellular hypoxia | Injection of a radioactive contrast agent |
| More rapid clearance than [18F]-FMISO | Needs to be validated in a greater number of studies | |
| Whole brain characterization | ||
| [18F]-HX4 and [18F]-FETNIM | Indicator of cellular hypoxia | Injection of a radioactive contrast agent |
| Whole brain characterization | Not recommended for brain tumors | |
| [18F]-EF5 | Indicator of cellular hypoxia | Injection of a radioactive contrast agent |
| Sensitivity near to immunohistochemistry | Synthesis of radiotracer remains difficult | |
| Whole brain characterization | ||
| [18F]-RP-170 | Reflect of cellular hypoxia | Injection of a radioactive contrast agent |
| Whole brain characterization | Needs to be validated in a greater number of studies |