Literature DB >> 29046174

Gravitational and Somatosensory Influences on Control and Perception of Roll Balance.

Alexander Sacha Panic, Heather Panic, Paul DiZio, James R Lackner.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Blindfolded subjects used a joystick to orient themselves to the direction of balance in a device programmed to exhibit inverted pendulum behavior in the roll plane; they indicated with a trigger press when they were at that location. Our goal was to determine how otolith and somatosensory information about the gravitational vertical influenced the ability to locate the direction of balance.
METHODS: The subjects (N = 12) were tested in each of three orientations of the body roll plane: vertical (Upright), 45° back (45_Degree), and 90° back (Supine), which provided progressively less salient otolith and somatosensory information about roll orientation with regard to the direction of gravity. For each pitch plane, subjects were tested with three directions of balance: 0° (aligned with the gravitational vertical in the Upright condition) and 30° right or left.
RESULTS: The mean achieved and indicated orientations for the Upright and 45_Degree conditions were significantly displaced away from the direction of balance in the direction of gravity, with indicated angles less displaced. In the Supine condition, the mean achieved and indicated angles were closer to the direction of balance, but their within-trial standard deviations were significantly larger than in the Upright and 45_Degree conditions, which did not differ. This greater variability resulted from the frequent side to side "drifting" behavior that was a characteristic feature of the Supine condition only. DISCUSSION: These findings indicate that in the absence of vision accurate dynamic orientation requires gravity dependent shear forces on the otolith organs and body surface.Panic AS, Panic H, DiZio P, Lackner JR. Gravitational and somatosensory influences on control and perception of roll balance. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017; 88(11):993-999.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29046174     DOI: 10.3357/AMHP.4853.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aerosp Med Hum Perform        ISSN: 2375-6314            Impact factor:   1.053


  5 in total

1.  Learning dynamic control of body yaw orientation.

Authors:  Vivekanand Pandey Vimal; James R Lackner; Paul DiZio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Learning dynamic balancing in the roll plane with and without gravitational cues.

Authors:  Vivekanand Pandey Vimal; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Learning and long-term retention of dynamic self-stabilization skills.

Authors:  Vivekanand Pandey Vimal; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  The Importance of Being in Touch.

Authors:  James R Lackner
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Crash Prediction Using Deep Learning in a Disorienting Spaceflight Analog Balancing Task.

Authors:  Yonglin Wang; Jie Tang; Vivekanand Pandey Vimal; James R Lackner; Paul DiZio; Pengyu Hong
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.