Literature DB >> 28839544

Circumstances in which colonoscopy misses cancer.

Linda Rabeneck1,2,3, Lawrence F Paszat2,3.   

Abstract

Colonoscopy is associated with a varying risk of missing colorectal cancer (CRC). The objective of this paper was to review the existing evidence that indicates when colonoscopy may miss cancer in usual clinical practice and to provide information that would be helpful to endoscopists in their daily practice. CRC is diagnosed within 3 years in about 5% of persons with CRC who undergo colonoscopy in whom the cancer is not detected. Future research should be directed at disentangling the relative contributions of tumour biology and colonoscopy quality in explaining this result. When consent is obtained for colonoscopy, patients must be informed of the small risk that a cancer may not be detected. Steps that can be taken to address colonoscopy quality include formal training in colonoscopy and polypectomy technique, coupled with maintenance of skills by performing at least 300 colonoscopies per year. The use of split dose bowel preparation is advised. Colonoscopy should be completed to the caecum with documentation of landmarks (ileocaecal valve; appendiceal orifice). Careful colonoscopy technique includes examining the proximal sides of flexures and folds, washing and suctioning debris and ensuring adequate colonic distension. Caecal intubation and adenoma detection rates should be reported and reviewed. Lesions should be completely removed at polypectomy and attention given to appropriate surveillance.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 28839544      PMCID: PMC5517157          DOI: 10.1136/fg.2009.000257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2041-4137


  32 in total

1.  Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John H Bond; Sidney Winawer; Theodore R Levin; Randall W Burt; David A Johnson; Lynne M Kirk; Scott Litlin; David A Lieberman; Jerome D Waye; James Church; John B Marshall; Robert H Riddell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK.

Authors:  B J Rembacken; T Fujii; A Cairns; M F Dixon; S Yoshida; D M Chalmers; A T Axon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-04-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates.

Authors:  D K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation.

Authors:  Elie Aoun; Heitham Abdul-Baki; Cecilio Azar; Fadi Mourad; Kassem Barada; Zeina Berro; Mohsen Tarchichi; Ala I Sharara
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Global cancer statistics, 2002.

Authors:  D Max Parkin; Freddie Bray; J Ferlay; Paola Pisani
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Ajay Pabby; Robert E Schoen; Joel L Weissfeld; Randall Burt; James W Kikendall; Peter Lance; Moshe Shike; Elaine Lanza; Arthur Schatzkin
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Pamela A Nugent; Pauline A Mysliwiec; J Richard Choi; William R Schindler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?

Authors:  C J A Bowles; R Leicester; C Romaya; E Swarbrick; C B Williams; O Epstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital.

Authors:  Florence Aslinia; Lance Uradomo; Allison Steele; Bruce D Greenwald; Jean-Pierre Raufman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Colorectal cancer risk in adenoma patients: a nation-wide study.

Authors:  F Loeve; M van Ballegooijen; R Boer; E J Kuipers; J D F Habbema
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  9 in total

1.  Scope to improve: a multi-centre audit of 16 064 colonoscopies looking at caecal intubation rates, over a 2-year period.

Authors:  Ajay Mark Verma; Nadine McGrath; Paula Bennett; John de Caestecker; Andrew Dixon; Jayne Eaden; Peter Wurm; Andrew Chilton
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-01

2.  Systematic analysis of missed colorectal cancer cases and common pitfalls in diagnosis.

Authors:  P G Vaughan-Shaw; M Aung; H Knight; T Williams; N R Borley; J M D Wheeler
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-28

3.  Factors Associated with Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Occurrence After Endoscopy that Did Not Diagnose Cancer.

Authors:  Danny Cheung; Shyam Menon; Jonathan Hoare; Anjan Dhar; Nigel Trudgill
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Interval colorectal cancers: what and why.

Authors:  Chantal M C le Clercq; Silvia Sanduleanu
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2014-03

5.  Clinically significant serrated polyp detection rates and risk for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; William Hisey; Todd A Mackenzie; Christina M Robinson; Amitabh Srivastava; Reinier G S Meester; Lynn F Butterly
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 10.396

6.  Computed tomography colonography versus colonoscopy for detection of colorectal cancer: a diagnostic performance study.

Authors:  Junping Sha; Jun Chen; Xuguang Lv; Shaoxin Liu; Ruihong Chen; Zhibing Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  National post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer data challenge services to improve quality of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Nicholas Burr; Roland Valori
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-05-08

8.  Variation in post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer across colonoscopy providers in English National Health Service: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Nicholas E Burr; Edmund Derbyshire; John Taylor; Simon Whalley; Venkataraman Subramanian; Paul J Finan; Matthew D Rutter; Roland Valori; Eva J A Morris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-11-13

9.  Detection of Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Neoplasia by Multi-target Stool DNA.

Authors:  Derek W Ebner; Jason D Eckmann; Kelli N Burger; Douglas W Mahoney; Jamie Bering; Allon Kahn; Eduardo A Rodriguez; David O Prichard; Michael B Wallace; Sunanda V Kane; Lila J Finney Rutten; Suryakanth R Gurudu; John B Kisiel
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.488

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.