Literature DB >> 12094842

Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Douglas K Rex1, John H Bond, Sidney Winawer, Theodore R Levin, Randall W Burt, David A Johnson, Lynne M Kirk, Scott Litlin, David A Lieberman, Jerome D Waye, James Church, John B Marshall, Robert H Riddell.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2002        PMID： 12094842     DOI： 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05812.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN： 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


× No keyword cloud information.
  275 in total

1.  Assessing bowel preparation quality using the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Benjamin Lebwohl; Richard M Rosenberg; Alfred I Neugut; Randi Wolf; Corey H Basch; Jennie Mata; Edwin Hernandez; Douglas A Corley; Steven Shea; Charles E Basch
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.409

2.  Trainees' adenoma detection rate is higher if ≥ 10 minutes is spent on withdrawal during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Mark A Gromski; Christopher A Miller; Suck-Ho Lee; Eun Seo Park; Tae Hoon Lee; Sang-Heum Park; Il-Kwun Chung; Sun-Joo Kim; Young Hwangbo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Developing a natural language processing application for measuring the quality of colonoscopy procedures.

Authors:  Henk Harkema; Wendy W Chapman; Melissa Saul; Evan S Dellon; Robert E Schoen; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Colonoscopy withdrawal times and adenoma detection rates.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2007-08

5.  Implementation of colonoscopic process measures: does it improve quality?

Authors:  Theodor Asgeirsson; Anthony J Senagore; Nadav Dujovny; Rebecca Hoedema; Donald Kim; Heather Slay; Martin Luchtefeld
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Fellow involvement during colonoscopy does not reduce adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Mark Friedman; Geeta Arora; Jesse Green
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  The quality of screening colonoscopies in an office-based endoscopy clinic.

Authors:  Douglas Bair; Joe Pham; M Bianca Seaton; Naveen Arya; Michelle Pryce; Trevor L Seaton
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.522

8.  Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Michele Morris; Rebecca A Gourevitch; David S Carrell; Daniel A Leffler; Sherri Rose; Julia B Greer; Seth D Crockett; Andrew Baer; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Race and Prevalence of Large Bowel Polyps Among the Low-Income and Uninsured in South Carolina.

Authors:  Kristin Wallace; Heather M Brandt; James D Bearden; Bridgette F Blankenship; Renay Caldwell; James Dunn; Patricia Hegedus; Brenda J Hoffman; Courtney H Marsh; William H Marsh; Cathy L Melvin; March E Seabrook; Ronald E Sterba; Mary Lou Stinson; Annie Thibault; Franklin G Berger; Anthony J Alberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Development and initial validation of an endoscopic part-task training box.

Authors:  Christopher C Thompson; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Nitin Kumar; Amy Ou; Andrew Camacho; Balazs Lengyel; Michele B Ryan
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 10.093
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.