Literature DB >> 28835120

The "Body Mass Index" of Flexible Ureteroscopes.

Silvia Proietti1, Bhaskar Somani2, Mario Sofer3, Amelia Pietropaolo2, Marco Rosso1, Giuseppe Saitta1, Franco Gaboardi1, Olivier Traxer4, Guido Giusti1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the "body mass index" (BMI) (weight and length) of 12 flexible ureteroscopes (digital and fiber optic) along with the light cables and camera heads, to make the best use of our instruments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve different brand-new flexible ureteroscopes from four different manufacturers, along with eight camera heads and three light cables were evaluated. Each ureteroscope, camera head, and light cable was weighted; the total length of each ureteroscope, shaft, handle, flexible end-tip, and cable were all measured.
RESULTS: According to our measurements (in grams [g]), the lightest ureteroscope was the LithoVue (277.5 g), while the heaviest was the URF-V2 (942.5 g). The lightest fiber optic endoscope was the Viper (309 g), while the heaviest was the Cobra (351.5 g). Taking into account the entirety of the endoscopes, the lightest ureteroscope was the Lithovue and the heaviest was the Wolf Cobra with the Wolf camera "3 CHIP HD KAMERA KOPF ENDOCAM LOGIC HD" (1474 g). The longest ureteroscope was the URF-P6 (101.6 cm) and the shortest was the LithoVue (95.5 cm); whereas the Viper and Cobra had the longest shaft (69 cm) and URF-V had the shortest shaft (67.2 cm). The URF-V2 had the longest flexible end-tip (7.6 cm), while the LithoVue had the shortest end-tip (5.7 cm) in both directions (up/down), while the URF-V had the shortest upward deflection (3.7 cm).
CONCLUSIONS: Newer more versatile digital endoscopes were lighter than their traditional fiber optic counterparts in their entirety, with disposable endoscope having a clear advantage over other reusable ureteroscopes. Knowing the "BMI" of our flexible ureteroscopes is an important information that every endourologist should always take into consideration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body mass index; ergonomics; flexible ureteroscopes; length; weight

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28835120     DOI: 10.1089/end.2017.0438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  7 in total

Review 1.  Which flexible ureteroscope is the best for upper tract urothelial carcinoma treatment?

Authors:  Etienne Xavier Keller; Steeve Doizi; Luca Villa; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes are more cost-effective than single-use scopes: results of a systematic review from PETRA Uro-group.

Authors:  Michele Talso; Ioannis K Goumas; Guido M Kamphuis; Laurian Dragos; Tzevat Tefik; Olivier Traxer; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

3.  Continuum Robots for Medical Interventions.

Authors:  Pierre E Dupont; Nabil Simaan; Howie Choset; Caleb Rucker
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 14.910

4.  Characteristics of current digital single-use flexible ureteroscopes versus their reusable counterparts: an in-vitro comparative analysis.

Authors:  Laurian B Dragos; Bhaskar K Somani; Etienne X Keller; Vincent M J De Coninck; Maria Rodriguez-Monsalve Herrero; Guido M Kamphuis; Ewa Bres-Niewada; Emre T Sener; Steeve Doizi; Oliver J Wiseman; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

5.  Evaluation of Performance Parameters of the Disposable Flexible Ureterorenoscope (LITHOVUE) in Patients with Renal Stones: A Prospective, Observational, Single-arm, Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Sung Yong Cho; Joo Yong Lee; Dong Gil Shin; Ill Young Seo; Sangjun Yoo; Hyung Keun Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparison of pre- and post-surgical images of reusable and single use flexible ureteroscopes: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Alfredo Domenech; Cristian Alliende; Bruno Vivaldi; Pablo Pizzi
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-09-09

Review 7.  Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: update and perspective in developing countries. A narrative review.

Authors:  Eduardo Mazzucchi; Giovanni Scala Marchini; Fernanda Christina Gabrigna Berto; John Denstedt; Alexandre Danilovic; Fabio Carvalho Vicentini; Fabio Cesar Miranda Torricelli; Carlos Alfredo Battagello; Miguel Srougi; William Carlos Nahas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.050

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.