Literature DB >> 30770944

Which flexible ureteroscope is the best for upper tract urothelial carcinoma treatment?

Etienne Xavier Keller1,2,3, Steeve Doizi2,3, Luca Villa4, Olivier Traxer5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present attributes of currently available flexible ureteroscopes to define the best flexible ureteroscope for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Scopus and Medline databases were searched for articles relating to performance of flexible ureteroscopes. A consensus for final inclusion of articles judged to be relevant for UTUC treatment was reached between the authors. Instrument characteristics were extracted from manufacturers' product brochures.
RESULTS: Smaller cross-sectional size of instruments is associated with increased probability for successful primary access to the upper urinary tract. The smallest flexible ureteroscopes are fiberoptic scopes. Smaller ureteroscopes also allow comparatively increased irrigation flow at constant intrarenal pressure. Digital flexible ureteroscopes achieve superior image quality compared to their fiberoptic counterparts, at the price of lower end-deflection ability. Image enhancement technologies such as narrow-band imaging (NBI), photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) and Image 1-S (formerly SPIES) are based on subjective image interpretation by the operator. NBI and PDD significantly increase tumor detection rate. The highest subjective image quality score of the Image 1-S technology is reached by the "Clara + Chroma" mode. Single-use ureteroscopes offer potential advantages over reusable scopes, including sterility, absence of contamination, immediate availability and exemption of previous instrument wear.
CONCLUSIONS: Miniaturization, digital image caption and image enhancement technologies seem to be the major determinants defining the best flexible ureteroscope for UTUC treatment. The impact of further factors, such as distal tip design, torque, working channel position, risk of contamination, as well as upcoming technological innovations should be evaluated in randomized controlled trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital; Image enhancement technology; Miniaturization; Upper tract urothelial carcinoma; Ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30770944     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02675-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  48 in total

1.  Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  Manoj Monga; Sara Best; Ramakrishna Venkatesh; Caroline Ames; Courtney Lee; Michael Kuskowski; Steven Schwartz; Richard Vanlangendock; Jason Skenazy; Jaime Landman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Light absorption of (oxy-)hemoglobin assessed by spectroscopic optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Dirk J Faber; Egbert G Mik; Maurice C G Aalders; Ton G van Leeuwen
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 3.776

3.  Care and sterilization of endourologic instruments.

Authors:  E Gregory; D Simmons; J J Weinberg
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Does the cleaning technique influence the durability of the <9F flexible ureteroscope?

Authors:  E M McDougall; G Alberts; K J Deal; J M Nagy
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Pyelorenal backflow in normal and ischemic rabbit kidneys.

Authors:  H S Thomsen; S Dorph; S Olsen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1981 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation for renal stones: comparison between digital and conventional ureteroscope.

Authors:  Bhaskar K Somani; Saeed M Al-Qahtani; Sixtina Diez Gil de Medina; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Can We Provide Low Intrarenal Pressures with Good Irrigation Flow by Decreasing the Size of Ureteral Access Sheaths?

Authors:  Tarik Emre Sener; Jonathan Cloutier; Luca Villa; Francesco Marson; Salvatore Butticè; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Systematic review of ureteral access sheaths: facts and myths.

Authors:  Vincent De Coninck; Etienne Xavier Keller; María Rodríguez-Monsalve; Marie Audouin; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 9.  Photodynamic diagnosis in urology: state-of-the-art.

Authors:  Dieter Jocham; Herbert Stepp; Raphaela Waidelich
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Photodynamic diagnosis in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review.

Authors:  Elsawi Osman; Ziad Alnaib; Nitya Kumar
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2017-03-06
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic challenges and treatment strategies in the management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Victor M Schuettfort; Benjamin Pradere; Fahad Quhal; Hadi Mostafaei; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Keiichiro Mori; Reza Sari Motlagh; Michael Rink; David D'Andrea; Mohammad Abufaraj; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-09

2.  Flexible fibre optic vs digital ureteroscopy and enhanced vs unenhanced imaging for diagnosis and treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC): results from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society (CROES)-UTUC registry.

Authors:  Francesco Soria; M Pilar Laguna; Morgan Roupret; Patricio Garcia-Marchinena; Mariano Sebastián Gonzalez; Tomonori Habuchi; Erkan Erkan; Anthony Ng; Paolo Gontero; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 5.969

3.  Is a ureteral stent required before flexible ureteroscopy?

Authors:  Qiyi Hu; Yongjian Ji; Zhu Wang; Yulin Lai; Qiong Deng; Jianwen Zhang; Hongliang Wang; Hui Liang; Hongjun Zhao
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

Review 4.  Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: update and perspective in developing countries. A narrative review.

Authors:  Eduardo Mazzucchi; Giovanni Scala Marchini; Fernanda Christina Gabrigna Berto; John Denstedt; Alexandre Danilovic; Fabio Carvalho Vicentini; Fabio Cesar Miranda Torricelli; Carlos Alfredo Battagello; Miguel Srougi; William Carlos Nahas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.050

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.