Literature DB >> 28829718

Development and field validation of a community-engaged particulate matter air quality monitoring network in Imperial, California, USA.

Graeme N Carvlin1, Humberto Lugo2, Luis Olmedo2, Ester Bejarano2, Alexa Wilkie3, Dan Meltzer3, Michelle Wong3, Galatea King3, Amanda Northcross4, Michael Jerrett5, Paul B English3, Donald Hammond6, Edmund Seto1.   

Abstract

The Imperial County Community Air Monitoring Network was developed as part of a community-engaged research study to provide real-time particulate matter (PM) air quality information at a high spatial resolution in Imperial County, California. The network augmented the few existing regulatory monitors and increased monitoring near susceptible populations. Monitors were both calibrated and field validated, a key component of evaluating the quality of the data produced by the community monitoring network. This paper examines the performance of a customized version of the low-cost Dylos optical particle counter used in the community air monitors compared with both PM2.5 and PM10 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters <2.5 and <10 μm, respectively) federal equivalent method (FEM) beta-attenuation monitors (BAMs) and federal reference method (FRM) gravimetric filters at a collocation site in the study area. A conversion equation was developed that estimates particle mass concentrations from the native Dylos particle counts, taking into account relative humidity. The R2 for converted hourly averaged Dylos mass measurements versus a PM2.5 BAM was 0.79 and that versus a PM10 BAM was 0.78. The performance of the conversion equation was evaluated at six other sites with collocated PM2.5 environmental beta-attenuation monitors (EBAMs) located throughout Imperial County. The agreement of the Dylos with the EBAMs was moderate to high (R2 = 0.35-0.81). IMPLICATIONS: The performance of low-cost air quality sensors in community networks is currently not well documented. This paper provides a methodology for quantifying the performance of a next-generation Dylos PM sensor used in the Imperial County Community Air Monitoring Network. This air quality network provides data at a much finer spatial and temporal resolution than has previously been possible with government monitoring efforts. Once calibrated and validated, these high-resolution data may provide more information on susceptible populations, assist in the identification of air pollution hotspots, and increase community awareness of air pollution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28829718      PMCID: PMC6179905          DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2017.1369471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  8 in total

1.  A low-cost particle counter as a realtime fine-particle mass monitor.

Authors:  Amanda L Northcross; Rufus J Edwards; Michael A Johnson; Zhong-Min Wang; Kunning Zhu; Tracy Allen; Kirk R Smith
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.238

Review 2.  Exposure to traffic-related air pollution and risk of development of childhood asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haneen Khreis; Charlotte Kelly; James Tate; Roger Parslow; Karen Lucas; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 3.  Clearing the air: a review of the effects of particulate matter air pollution on human health.

Authors:  Jonathan O Anderson; Josef G Thundiyil; Andrew Stolbach
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2012-06

4.  Personal exposure monitoring of PM2.5 in indoor and outdoor microenvironments.

Authors:  Susanne Steinle; Stefan Reis; Clive E Sabel; Sean Semple; Marsailidh M Twigg; Christine F Braban; Sarah R Leeson; Mathew R Heal; David Harrison; Chun Lin; Hao Wu
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 5.  Air pollution and children's health.

Authors:  Joel Schwartz
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  The Global Threat of Outdoor Ambient Air Pollution to Cardiovascular Health: Time for Intervention.

Authors:  Robert D Brook; David E Newby; Sanjay Rajagopalan
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 7.  Long-term exposure to ambient ozone and mortality: a quantitative systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence from cohort studies.

Authors:  R W Atkinson; B K Butland; C Dimitroulopoulou; M R Heal; J R Stedman; N Carslaw; D Jarvis; C Heaviside; S Vardoulakis; H Walton; H R Anderson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  The Imperial County Community Air Monitoring Network: A Model for Community-based Environmental Monitoring for Public Health Action.

Authors:  Paul B English; Luis Olmedo; Ester Bejarano; Humberto Lugo; Eduardo Murillo; Edmund Seto; Michelle Wong; Galatea King; Alexa Wilkie; Dan Meltzer; Graeme Carvlin; Michael Jerrett; Amanda Northcross
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total
  15 in total

1.  Public Participation in Air Sampling and Water Quality Test Kit Development to Enable Citizen Science.

Authors:  Erin N Haynes; Timothy J Hilbert; Rusty Roberts; John Quirolgico; Rachael Shepler; Gerry Beckner; Jennifer Veevers; Jeff Burkle; Roman Jandarov
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2019

2.  Statistical field calibration of a low-cost PM2.5 monitoring network in Baltimore.

Authors:  Abhirup Datta; Arkajyoti Saha; Misti Levy Zamora; Colby Buehler; Lei Hao; Fulizi Xiong; Drew R Gentner; Kirsten Koehler
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Contribution of low-cost sensor measurements to the prediction of PM2.5 levels: A case study in Imperial County, California, USA.

Authors:  Jianzhao Bi; Jennifer Stowell; Edmund Y W Seto; Paul B English; Mohammad Z Al-Hamdan; Patrick L Kinney; Frank R Freedman; Yang Liu
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM2.5 and PM10 Measurements.

Authors:  Natalie Crnosija; Misti Levy Zamora; Ana M Rule; Devon Payne-Sturges
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multi-city epidemiological study.

Authors:  Marina Zusman; Cooper S Schumacher; Amanda J Gassett; Elizabeth W Spalt; Elena Austin; Timothy V Larson; Graeme Carvlin; Edmund Seto; Joel D Kaufman; Lianne Sheppard
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Personal Exposure to PM2.5 Black Carbon and Aerosol Oxidative Potential using an Automated Microenvironmental Aerosol Sampler (AMAS).

Authors:  Casey Quinn; Daniel D Miller-Lionberg; Kevin J Klunder; Jaymin Kwon; Elizabeth M Noth; John Mehaffy; David Leith; Sheryl Magzamen; S Katharine Hammond; Charles S Henry; John Volckens
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Publicly available low-cost sensor measurements for PM2.5 exposure modeling: Guidance for monitor deployment and data selection.

Authors:  Jianzhao Bi; Nancy Carmona; Magali N Blanco; Amanda J Gassett; Edmund Seto; Adam A Szpiro; Timothy V Larson; Paul D Sampson; Joel D Kaufman; Lianne Sheppard
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 9.621

8.  Using Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Networks to Improve the Spatial and Temporal Resolution of Concentration Maps.

Authors:  Faraz Enayati Ahangar; Frank R Freedman; Akula Venkatram
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Real-time particle monitoring of pesticide drift from an axial fan airblast orchard sprayer.

Authors:  Magali N Blanco; Richard A Fenske; Edward J Kasner; Michael G Yost; Edmund Seto; Elena Austin
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.563

10.  Combining Community Engagement and Scientific Approaches in Next-Generation Monitor Siting: The Case of the Imperial County Community Air Network.

Authors:  Michelle Wong; Esther Bejarano; Graeme Carvlin; Katie Fellows; Galatea King; Humberto Lugo; Michael Jerrett; Dan Meltzer; Amanda Northcross; Luis Olmedo; Edmund Seto; Alexa Wilkie; Paul English
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.