Literature DB >> 25497678

Personal exposure monitoring of PM2.5 in indoor and outdoor microenvironments.

Susanne Steinle1, Stefan Reis2, Clive E Sabel3, Sean Semple4, Marsailidh M Twigg5, Christine F Braban5, Sarah R Leeson5, Mathew R Heal6, David Harrison7, Chun Lin6, Hao Wu8.   

Abstract

Adverse health effects from exposure to air pollution are a global challenge and of widespread concern. Recent high ambient concentration episodes of air pollutants in European cities highlighted the dynamic nature of human exposure and the gaps in data and knowledge about exposure patterns. In order to support health impact assessment it is essential to develop a better understanding of individual exposure pathways in people's everyday lives by taking account of all environments in which people spend time. Here we describe the development, validation and results of an exposure method applied in a study conducted in Scotland. A low-cost particle counter based on light-scattering technology - the Dylos 1700 was used. Its performance was validated in comparison with equivalent instruments (TEOM-FDMS) at two national monitoring network sites (R(2)=0.9 at a rural background site, R(2)=0.7 at an urban background site). This validation also provided two functions to convert measured PNCs into calculated particle mass concentrations for direct comparison of concentrations with equivalent monitoring instruments and air quality limit values. This study also used contextual and time-based activity data to define six microenvironments (MEs) to assess everyday exposure of individuals to short-term PM2.5 concentrations. The Dylos was combined with a GPS receiver to track movement and exposure of individuals across the MEs. Seventeen volunteers collected 35 profiles. Profiles may have a different overall duration and structure with respect to times spent in different MEs and activities undertaken. Results indicate that due to the substantial variability across and between MEs, it is essential to measure near-complete exposure pathways to allow for a comprehensive assessment of the exposure risk a person encounters on a daily basis. Taking into account the information gained through personal exposure measurements, this work demonstrates the added value of data generated by the application of low-cost monitors.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; GPS; Particle counter; Particulate matter; Personal exposure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25497678     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  44 in total

1.  Characteristics of indoor and outdoor fine particles in heating period at urban, suburban, and rural sites in Harbin, China.

Authors:  Wenxu Fang; Weiwei Song; Liyan Liu; Guangnian Chen; Linan Ma; Yuxuan Liang; Yujie Xu; Xueying Wang; Yehao Ji; Yu Zhuang; Amadou Hima Boubacar; Yifan Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Considerations for evaluating green infrastructure impacts in microscale and macroscale air pollution dispersion models.

Authors:  Arvind Tiwari; Prashant Kumar; Richard Baldauf; K Max Zhang; Francesco Pilla; Silvana Di Sabatino; Erika Brattich; Beatrice Pulvirenti
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Uncertainty associated with ambient ozone metrics in epidemiologic studies and risk assessments.

Authors:  Benjamin Wells; Heather Simon; Thomas J Luben; Zachary Pekar; Scott M Jenkins
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.763

4.  Field Test of Several Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in High and Low Concentration Urban Environments.

Authors:  Karoline K Johnson; Michael H Bergin; Armistead G Russell; Gayle S W Hagler
Journal:  Aerosol Air Qual Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.063

5.  Statistical field calibration of a low-cost PM2.5 monitoring network in Baltimore.

Authors:  Abhirup Datta; Arkajyoti Saha; Misti Levy Zamora; Colby Buehler; Lei Hao; Fulizi Xiong; Drew R Gentner; Kirsten Koehler
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Addressing location uncertainties in GPS-based activity monitoring: A methodological framework.

Authors:  Neng Wan; Ge Lin; Gaines J Wilson
Journal:  Trans GIS       Date:  2016-09-19

7.  Development and field validation of a community-engaged particulate matter air quality monitoring network in Imperial, California, USA.

Authors:  Graeme N Carvlin; Humberto Lugo; Luis Olmedo; Ester Bejarano; Alexa Wilkie; Dan Meltzer; Michelle Wong; Galatea King; Amanda Northcross; Michael Jerrett; Paul B English; Donald Hammond; Edmund Seto
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.235

Review 8.  Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment: How far have they gone?

Authors:  Lidia Morawska; Phong K Thai; Xiaoting Liu; Akwasi Asumadu-Sakyi; Godwin Ayoko; Alena Bartonova; Andrea Bedini; Fahe Chai; Bryce Christensen; Matthew Dunbabin; Jian Gao; Gayle S W Hagler; Rohan Jayaratne; Prashant Kumar; Alexis K H Lau; Peter K K Louie; Mandana Mazaheri; Zhi Ning; Nunzio Motta; Ben Mullins; Md Mahmudur Rahman; Zoran Ristovski; Mahnaz Shafiei; Dian Tjondronegoro; Dane Westerdahl; Ron Williams
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 9.621

9.  Inter-comparison of Low-cost Sensors for Measuring the Mass Concentration of Occupational Aerosols.

Authors:  Sinan Sousan; Kirsten Koehler; Geb Thomas; Jae Hong Park; Michael Hillman; Andrew Halterman; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 10.  New Methods for Personal Exposure Monitoring for Airborne Particles.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.