Literature DB >> 32922146

Statistical field calibration of a low-cost PM2.5 monitoring network in Baltimore.

Abhirup Datta1, Arkajyoti Saha1, Misti Levy Zamora2,3, Colby Buehler3,4, Lei Hao2, Fulizi Xiong3,4, Drew R Gentner3,4, Kirsten Koehler2,3.   

Abstract

Low-cost air pollution monitors are increasingly being deployed to enrich knowledge about ambient air-pollution at high spatial and temporal resolutions. However, unlike regulatory-grade (FEM or FRM) instruments, universal quality standards for low-cost sensors are yet to be established and their data quality varies widely. This mandates thorough evaluation and calibration before any responsible use of such data. This study presents evaluation and field-calibration of the PM2.5 data from a network of low-cost monitors currently operating in Baltimore, MD, which has only one regulatory PM2.5 monitoring site within city limits. Co-location analysis at this regulatory site in Oldtown, Baltimore revealed high variability and significant overestimation of PM2.5 levels by the raw data from these monitors. Universal laboratory corrections reduced the bias in the data, but only partially mitigated the high variability. Eight months of field co-location data at Oldtown were used to develop a gain-offset calibration model, recast as a multiple linear regression. The statistical model offered substantial improvement in prediction quality over the raw or lab-corrected data. The results were robust to the choice of the low-cost monitor used for field-calibration, as well as to different seasonal choices of training period. The raw, lab-corrected and statistically-calibrated data were evaluated for a period of two months following the training period. The statistical model had the highest agreement with the reference data, producing a 24-hour average root-mean-square-error (RMSE) of around 2 μg m -3. To assess transferability of the calibration equations to other monitors in the network, a cross-site evaluation was conducted at a second co-location site in suburban Essex, MD. The statistically calibrated data once again produced the lowest RMSE. The calibrated PM2.5 readings from the monitors in the low-cost network provided insights into the intra-urban spatiotemporal variations of PM2.5 in Baltimore.

Keywords:  Baltimore; PM2.5; field colocation; gain-offset model; linear regression; low-cost monitors

Year:  2020        PMID: 32922146      PMCID: PMC7480820          DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)        ISSN: 1352-2310            Impact factor:   4.798


  32 in total

1.  The National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study. Part II: Morbidity and mortality from air pollution in the United States.

Authors:  J M Samet; S L Zeger; F Dominici; F Curriero; I Coursac; D W Dockery; J Schwartz; A Zanobetti
Journal:  Res Rep Health Eff Inst       Date:  2000-06

2.  Modeling the effect of weekday-weekend differences in motor vehicle emissions on photochemical air pollution in central California.

Authors:  Linsey C Marr; Robert A Harley
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Mobile monitoring of particle light absorption coefficient in an urban area as a basis for land use regression.

Authors:  Timothy Larson; Sarah B Henderson; Michael Brauer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates?

Authors:  Nuria Castell; Franck R Dauge; Philipp Schneider; Matthias Vogt; Uri Lerner; Barak Fishbain; David Broday; Alena Bartonova
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  Elucidating secondary organic aerosol from diesel and gasoline vehicles through detailed characterization of organic carbon emissions.

Authors:  Drew R Gentner; Gabriel Isaacman; David R Worton; Arthur W H Chan; Timothy R Dallmann; Laura Davis; Shang Liu; Douglas A Day; Lynn M Russell; Kevin R Wilson; Robin Weber; Abhinav Guha; Robert A Harley; Allen H Goldstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Field Test of Several Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in High and Low Concentration Urban Environments.

Authors:  Karoline K Johnson; Michael H Bergin; Armistead G Russell; Gayle S W Hagler
Journal:  Aerosol Air Qual Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.063

7.  Development and field validation of a community-engaged particulate matter air quality monitoring network in Imperial, California, USA.

Authors:  Graeme N Carvlin; Humberto Lugo; Luis Olmedo; Ester Bejarano; Alexa Wilkie; Dan Meltzer; Michelle Wong; Galatea King; Amanda Northcross; Michael Jerrett; Paul B English; Donald Hammond; Edmund Seto
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.235

8.  Fine particulate air pollution and hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases.

Authors:  Francesca Dominici; Roger D Peng; Michelle L Bell; Luu Pham; Aidan McDermott; Scott L Zeger; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Validation of Low-Cost Sensors in Measuring Real-Time PM10 Concentrations at Two Sites in Delhi National Capital Region.

Authors:  Ravi Sahu; Kuldeep Kumar Dixit; Suneeti Mishra; Purushottam Kumar; Ashutosh Kumar Shukla; Ronak Sutaria; Shashi Tiwari; Sachchida Nand Tripathi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Particulate Matter Exposure and Preterm Birth: Estimates of U.S. Attributable Burden and Economic Costs.

Authors:  Leonardo Trasande; Patrick Malecha; Teresa M Attina
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluating the Performance of Using Low-Cost Sensors to Calibrate for Cross-Sensitivities in a Multipollutant Network.

Authors:  Misti Levy Zamora; Colby Buehler; Hao Lei; Abhirup Datta; Fulizi Xiong; Drew R Gentner; Kirsten Koehler
Journal:  ACS ES T Eng       Date:  2022-04-11

2.  Development and Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Portable PM2.5 Monitor for Mobile Deployment.

Authors:  Mingjian Chen; Weichang Yuan; Chang Cao; Colby Buehler; Drew R Gentner; Xuhui Lee
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Stationary and portable multipollutant monitors for high-spatiotemporal-resolution air quality studies including online calibration.

Authors:  Colby Buehler; Fulizi Xiong; Misti Levy Zamora; Kate M Skog; Joseph Kohrman-Glaser; Stefan Colton; Michael McNamara; Kevin Ryan; Carrie Redlich; Matthew Bartos; Brandon Wong; Branko Kerkez; Kirsten Koehler; Drew R Gentner
Journal:  Atmos Meas Tech       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.184

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.