Literature DB >> 25208708

A low-cost particle counter as a realtime fine-particle mass monitor.

Amanda L Northcross1, Rufus J Edwards, Michael A Johnson, Zhong-Min Wang, Kunning Zhu, Tracy Allen, Kirk R Smith.   

Abstract

Exposure to particles with aerodynamic diameters less than 2.5 μm is estimated to cause significant morbidity and mortality worldwide leading many countries to develop ambient air pollution standards and guidelines. At local scales, community and environmental justice groups are also concerned about PM 2.5 concentrations that may be elevated above regional concentrations typically measured by centrally located monitors and standards as well. In an attempt to develop a low cost, easy to use monitor we evaluated a low-cost optical particle counter, the Dylos™, as a fine particulate mass sensor. Modified into a system called the Berkeley Aerosol Information Recording System (BAIRS), we compared performance against standard commercial instruments in chambers using polystyrene latex spheres, ammonium sulphate, and woodsmoke and in an urban ambient setting. Overall we find that the limit of detection of the BAIRS is less than 1 μg m (-3) and the resolution is better than 1 μg m(-3) for PM 2.5. The BAIRS sizes small (<0.5 μm) particles, and is able to accurately estimate the mass concentration of particles of varying composition including organic, inorganic, and ambient particles. It is able to measure concentrations up to 10.0 mg m (-3). In an ambient roof-top test of the BAIRS and a more expensive commercially available light scattering particle monitor the BAIRS response tracked well with the commercial monitor and daily means were within 80% of each other. We conclude that with appropriate modification the system could be developed into an accurate low cost realtime particle mass monitor for use in a wide range of applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 25208708     DOI: 10.1039/c2em30568b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts        ISSN: 2050-7887            Impact factor:   4.238


  27 in total

1.  Randomized Trial to Reduce Air Particle Levels in Homes of Smokers and Children.

Authors:  Suzanne C Hughes; John Bellettiere; Benjamin Nguyen; Sandy Liles; Neil E Klepeis; Penelope J E Quintana; Vincent Berardi; Saori Obayashi; Savannah Bradley; C Richard Hofstetter; Melbourne F Hovell
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Community Air Sensor Network (CAIRSENSE) project: evaluation of low-cost sensor performance in a suburban environment in the southeastern United States.

Authors:  Wan Jiao; Gayle Hagler; Ronald Williams; Robert Sharpe; Ryan Brown; Daniel Garver; Robert Judge; Motria Caudill; Joshua Rickard; Michael Davis; Lewis Weinstock; Susan Zimmer-Dauphinee; Ken Buckley
Journal:  Atmos Meas Tech       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Development and field validation of a community-engaged particulate matter air quality monitoring network in Imperial, California, USA.

Authors:  Graeme N Carvlin; Humberto Lugo; Luis Olmedo; Ester Bejarano; Alexa Wilkie; Dan Meltzer; Michelle Wong; Galatea King; Amanda Northcross; Michael Jerrett; Paul B English; Donald Hammond; Edmund Seto
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.235

Review 4.  Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment: How far have they gone?

Authors:  Lidia Morawska; Phong K Thai; Xiaoting Liu; Akwasi Asumadu-Sakyi; Godwin Ayoko; Alena Bartonova; Andrea Bedini; Fahe Chai; Bryce Christensen; Matthew Dunbabin; Jian Gao; Gayle S W Hagler; Rohan Jayaratne; Prashant Kumar; Alexis K H Lau; Peter K K Louie; Mandana Mazaheri; Zhi Ning; Nunzio Motta; Ben Mullins; Md Mahmudur Rahman; Zoran Ristovski; Mahnaz Shafiei; Dian Tjondronegoro; Dane Westerdahl; Ron Williams
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  Real-Time Monitoring of Spray Drift from Three Different Orchard Sprayers.

Authors:  Magali N Blanco; Richard A Fenske; Edward J Kasner; Michael G Yost; Edmund Seto; Elena Austin
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Laboratory evaluation of a low-cost, real-time, aerosol multi-sensor.

Authors:  Robert J Vercellino; Darrah K Sleeth; Rodney G Handy; Kyeong T Min; Scott C Collingwood
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Performance of Four Consumer-grade Air Pollution Measurement Devices in Different Residences.

Authors:  Sydonia Manibusan; Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  Aerosol Air Qual Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.063

8.  Inter-comparison of Low-cost Sensors for Measuring the Mass Concentration of Occupational Aerosols.

Authors:  Sinan Sousan; Kirsten Koehler; Geb Thomas; Jae Hong Park; Michael Hillman; Andrew Halterman; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 9.  New Methods for Personal Exposure Monitoring for Airborne Particles.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-12

10.  Evaluation of a Low-Cost Aerosol Sensor to Assess Dust Concentrations in a Swine Building.

Authors:  Samuel Jones; T Renée Anthony; Sinan Sousan; Ralph Altmaier; Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2016-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.