Literature DB >> 28828745

Optimal combination of environmental cues and path integration during navigation.

Lori A Sjolund1, Jonathan W Kelly2, Timothy P McNamara3.   

Abstract

Navigation is influenced by body-based self-motion cues that are integrated over time, in a process known as path integration, as well as by environmental cues such as landmarks and room shape. In two experiments we explored whether humans combine path integration and environmental cues (Exp. 1: room shape; Exp. 2: room shape, single landmark, and multiple landmarks) to reduce response variability when returning to a previously visited location. Participants walked an outbound path in an immersive virtual environment before attempting to return to the path origin. Path integration and an environmental cue were both available during the outbound path, but experimental manipulations created single- and dual-cue conditions during the return path. The response variance when returning to the path origin was reduced when both cues were available, consistent with optimal integration predicted on the basis of Bayesian principles. The findings indicate that humans optimally integrate multiple spatial cues during navigation. Additionally, a large (but not a small) cue conflict caused participants to assign a higher weight to path integration than to environmental cues, despite the relatively greater precision afforded by the environmental cues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cue combination; Navigation; Path integration; Spatial cognition

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28828745     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-017-0747-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  24 in total

1.  Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination.

Authors:  James M Hillis; Simon J Watt; Michael S Landy; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs.

Authors:  Roger Bakeman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

Review 3.  Bayesian integration of spatial information.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Sara J Shettleworth; Janellen Huttenlocher; John J Rieser
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Robust cue integration: a Bayesian model and evidence from cue-conflict studies with stereoscopic and figure cues to slant.

Authors:  David C Knill
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Discrimination of planar surface slant from texture: human and ideal observers compared.

Authors:  D C Knill
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Multiple systems for spatial learning: dead reckoning and beacon homing in rats.

Authors:  Sara J Shettleworth; Jennifer E Sutton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-04

7.  Shape from texture: ideal observers and human psychophysics.

Authors:  A Blake; H H Bülthoff; D Sheinberg
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion.

Authors:  M S Landy; L T Maloney; E B Johnston; M Young
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Development of cue integration in human navigation.

Authors:  Marko Nardini; Peter Jones; Rachael Bedford; Oliver Braddick
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Causal inference in multisensory perception.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Ulrik Beierholm; Wei Ji Ma; Steven Quartz; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Ladan Shams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Cholinergic modulation of spatial learning, memory and navigation.

Authors:  Nicola Solari; Balázs Hangya
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 2.  Construction and disruption of spatial memory networks during development.

Authors:  Tallie Z Baram; Flavio Donato; Gregory L Holmes
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Merging familiar and new senses to perceive and act in space.

Authors:  Marko Nardini
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-08-19

Review 4.  Navigation in Real-World Environments: New Opportunities Afforded by Advances in Mobile Brain Imaging.

Authors:  Joanne L Park; Paul A Dudchenko; David I Donaldson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Cue combination in goal-oriented navigation.

Authors:  Yafei Qi; Weimin Mou; Xuehui Lei
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.143

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.