Literature DB >> 18450447

Development of cue integration in human navigation.

Marko Nardini1, Peter Jones, Rachael Bedford, Oliver Braddick.   

Abstract

Mammalian navigation depends both on visual landmarks and on self-generated (e.g., vestibular and proprioceptive) cues that signal the organism's own movement [1-5]. When these conflict, landmarks can either reset estimates of self-motion or be integrated with them [6-9]. We asked how humans combine these information sources and whether children, who use both from a young age [10-12], combine them as adults do. Participants attempted to return an object to its original place in an arena when given either visual landmarks only, nonvisual self-motion information only, or both. Adults, but not 4- to 5-year-olds or 7- to 8-year-olds, reduced their response variance when both information sources were available. In an additional "conflict" condition that measured relative reliance on landmarks and self-motion, we predicted behavior under two models: integration (weighted averaging) of the cues and alternation between them. Adults' behavior was predicted by integration, in which the cues were weighted nearly optimally to reduce variance, whereas children's behavior was predicted by alternation. These results suggest that development of individual spatial-representational systems precedes development of the capacity to combine these within a common reference frame. Humans can integrate spatial cues nearly optimally to navigate, but this ability depends on an extended developmental process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18450447     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  100 in total

Review 1.  Building a cognitive map by assembling multiple path integration systems.

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

Review 2.  How environment and self-motion combine in neural representations of space.

Authors:  Talfan Evans; Andrej Bicanski; Daniel Bush; Neil Burgess
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Multisensory integration compensates loss of sensitivity of visual temporal order in the elderly.

Authors:  Liselotte de Boer-Schellekens; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Improvements in proprioceptive functioning influence multisensory-motor integration in 7- to 13-year-old children.

Authors:  Bradley R King; Melissa M Pangelinan; Florian A Kagerer; Jane E Clark
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Links between temporal acuity and multisensory integration across life span.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Sarah H Baum; Juliane Krueger; Paul A Newhouse; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The development of path integration: combining estimations of distance and heading.

Authors:  Alastair D Smith; Laura McKeith; Christina J Howard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The shape of human navigation: how environmental geometry is used in maintenance of spatial orientation.

Authors:  Jonathan W Kelly; Timothy P McNamara; Bobby Bodenheimer; Thomas H Carr; John J Rieser
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-10-25

8.  Individual differences in using geometric and featural cues to maintain spatial orientation: cue quantity and cue ambiguity are more important than cue type.

Authors:  Jonathan W Kelly; Timothy P McNamara; Bobby Bodenheimer; Thomas H Carr; John J Rieser
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

9.  The development of Bayesian integration in sensorimotor estimation.

Authors:  Claire Chambers; Taegh Sokhey; Deborah Gaebler-Spira; Konrad Paul Kording
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Motor commands in children interfere with their haptic perception of objects.

Authors:  Monica Gori; Valentina Squeri; Alessandra Sciutti; Lorenzo Masia; Giulio Sandini; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.