Literature DB >> 8236859

Shape from texture: ideal observers and human psychophysics.

A Blake1, H H Bülthoff, D Sheinberg.   

Abstract

We describe an ideal observer model for estimating "shape from texture" which is derived from the principles of statistical information. For a given family of surface shapes, measures of statistical information can be computed for two different texture cues--density and orientation of texels. These measures can be used to predict lower bounds on the variance of shape judgements of "ideal" and human observers. They can also predict optimal weights for cue integration for the inference of shape from texture. These weights are directly proportional to the information carried by each cue. The ideal observer model therefore predicts that the variance of subjects' responses in a psychophysical shape judgement task should reflect the statistical importance of individual texture cues. Our results show that human performance in shape judgements for a one-parameter family of parabolic cylinders is often better than what an ideal observer achieves using a density cue alone. Therefore other information, for example the compression cue, must be used by human observers. For the first time, such results have been obtained without recourse to the unnatural cue conflict paradigms used in previous experiments. The model makes further predictions for the perception of planar slanted surfaces in the case of wide field of view.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8236859     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90037-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  20 in total

Review 1.  Contributions of ideal observer theory to vision research.

Authors:  Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Estimation of 3D shape from image orientations.

Authors:  Roland W Fleming; Daniel Holtmann-Rice; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Focus cues affect perceived depth.

Authors:  Simon J Watt; Kurt Akeley; Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Recognition-by-parts: a computational approach to human learning and generalization of shapes.

Authors:  M Jüttner; T Caelli; I Rentschler
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Optimal combination of environmental cues and path integration during navigation.

Authors:  Lori A Sjolund; Jonathan W Kelly; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-01

6.  Fusion of visual cues is not mandatory in children.

Authors:  Marko Nardini; Rachael Bedford; Denis Mareschal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Interval timing, temporal averaging, and cue integration.

Authors:  Benjamin J De Corte; Matthew S Matell
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-04

8.  Shape judgments in natural scenes: Convexity biases versus stereopsis.

Authors:  Brittney Hartle; Aishwarya Sudhama-Joseph; Elizabeth L Irving; Robert S Allison; Mackenzie G Glaholt; Laurie M Wilcox
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

9.  Efficient integration across spatial frequencies for letter identification in foveal and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Anirvan S Nandy; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Optimal integration of shape information from vision and touch.

Authors:  Hannah B Helbig; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 2.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.