Literature DB >> 15669906

Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination.

James M Hillis1, Simon J Watt, Michael S Landy, Martin S Banks.   

Abstract

How does the visual system combine information from different depth cues to estimate three-dimensional scene parameters? We tested a maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) model of cue combination for perspective (texture) and binocular disparity cues to surface slant. By factoring the reliability of each cue into the combination process, MLE provides more reliable estimates of slant than would be available from either cue alone. We measured the reliability of each cue in isolation across a range of slants and distances using a slant-discrimination task. The reliability of the texture cue increases as |slant| increases and does not change with distance. The reliability of the disparity cue decreases as distance increases and varies with slant in a way that also depends on viewing distance. The trends in the single-cue data can be understood in terms of the information available in the retinal images and issues related to solving the binocular correspondence problem. To test the MLE model, we measured perceived slant of two-cue stimuli when disparity and texture were in conflict and the reliability of slant estimation when both cues were available. Results from the two-cue study indicate, consistent with the MLE model, that observers weight each cue according to its relative reliability: Disparity weight decreased as distance and |slant| increased. We also observed the expected improvement in slant estimation when both cues were available. With few discrepancies, our data indicate that observers combine cues in a statistically optimal fashion and thereby reduce the variance of slant estimates below that which could be achieved from either cue alone. These results are consistent with other studies that quantitatively examined the MLE model of cue combination. Thus, there is a growing empirical consensus that MLE provides a good quantitative account of cue combination and that sensory information is used in a manner that maximizes the precision of perceptual estimates.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15669906     DOI: 10.1167/4.12.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  139 in total

1.  Representation of 3-D surface orientation by velocity and disparity gradient cues in area MT.

Authors:  Takahisa M Sanada; Jerry D Nguyenkim; Gregory C Deangelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Estimation of 3D shape from image orientations.

Authors:  Roland W Fleming; Daniel Holtmann-Rice; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Combination of texture and color cues in visual segmentation.

Authors:  Toni P Saarela; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Knowing how much you don't know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 5.  Visual and vestibular cue integration for heading perception in extrastriate visual cortex.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Yong Gu; Gregory C Deangelis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Natural-scene statistics predict how the figure-ground cue of convexity affects human depth perception.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Charless C Fowlkes; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  In visual search, guidance by surface type is different than classic guidance.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Ester Reijnen; Michael J Van Wert; Yoana Kuzmova
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Dynamic reweighting of visual and vestibular cues during self-motion perception.

Authors:  Christopher R Fetsch; Amanda H Turner; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Efficient integration across spatial frequencies for letter identification in foveal and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Anirvan S Nandy; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Multisensory oddity detection as bayesian inference.

Authors:  Timothy Hospedales; Sethu Vijayakumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.