Literature DB >> 24673660

Listening effort and fatigue: what exactly are we measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group 'white paper'.

Ronan McGarrigle1, Kevin J Munro, Piers Dawes, Andrew J Stewart, David R Moore, Johanna G Barry, Sygal Amitay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is growing interest in the concepts of listening effort and fatigue associated with hearing loss. However, the theoretical underpinnings and clinical meaning of these concepts are unclear. This lack of clarity reflects both the relative immaturity of the field and the fact that research studies investigating listening effort and fatigue have used a variety of methodologies including self-report, behavioural, and physiological measures.
DESIGN: This discussion paper provides working definitions for listening effort and listening-related fatigue. Using these definitions as a framework, methodologies to assess these constructs are reviewed.
RESULTS: Although each technique attempts to characterize the same construct (i.e. the clinical presentation of listening effort and fatigue), different assumptions are often made about the nature of these phenomena and their behavioural and physiological manifestations.
CONCLUSION: We suggest that researchers consider these assumptions when interpreting their data and, where possible, make predictions based on current theoretical knowledge to add to our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of listening effort and listening-related fatigue. FOREWORD: Following recent interest in the cognitive involvement in hearing, the British Society of Audiology (BSA) established a Special Interest Group on Cognition in Hearing in May 2013. In an exploratory group meeting, the ambiguity surrounding listening effort and fatigue was discussed. To address this problem, the group decided to develop a 'white paper' on listening effort and fatigue. This is a discussion document followed by an international set of commentaries from leading researchers in the field. An approach was made to the editor of the International Journal of Audiology who agreed to this suggestion. This paper, and the associated commentaries that follow, are the result.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Listening effort; fatigue; hearing loss; measurement techniques

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24673660     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2014.890296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  101 in total

1.  Psychometric Functions of Dual-Task Paradigms for Measuring Listening Effort.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Xuyang Zhang; Joanna Perkins; Emily Eilers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  A Taxonomy of Fatigue Concepts and Their Relation to Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Graham Naylor; Fred H Bess
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Listening and Learning: Cognitive Contributions to the Rehabilitation of Older Adults With and Without Audiometrically Defined Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Kristina C Backer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  [Speech comprehension and cognitive performance in acoustically difficult situations].

Authors:  H Meister
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Evidence for enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope underlying age-related speech-in-noise difficulties.

Authors:  Lien Decruy; Jonas Vanthornhout; Tom Francart
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Variations Within Normal Hearing Acuity and Speech Comprehension: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Nicole D Ayasse; Lana R Penn; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  Pupillometry shows the effort of auditory attention switching.

Authors:  Daniel R McCloy; Bonnie K Lau; Eric Larson; Katherine A I Pratt; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Speech audiometry, speech perception, and cognitive functions : English version.

Authors:  H Meister
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Verbal Response Times as a Potential Indicator of Cognitive Load During Conventional Speech Audiometry With Matrix Sentences.

Authors:  Hartmut Meister; Sebastian Rählmann; Ulrike Lemke; Jana Besser
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Listening Effort Measured in Adults with Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ann E Perreau; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Bailey Tatge; Diana Irwin; Daniel Corts
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.