Literature DB >> 32611135

Recognition of foreign-accented speech in noise: The interplay between talker intelligibility and linguistic structure.

Dorina Strori1, Ann R Bradlow2, Pamela E Souza1.   

Abstract

Foreign-accented speech recognition is typically tested with linguistically simple materials, which offer a limited window into realistic speech processing. The present study examined the relationship between linguistic structure and talker intelligibility in several sentence-in-noise recognition experiments. Listeners transcribed simple/short and more complex/longer sentences embedded in noise. The sentences were spoken by three talkers of varying intelligibility: one native, one high-, and one low-intelligibility non-native English speakers. The effect of linguistic structure on sentence recognition accuracy was modulated by talker intelligibility. Accuracy was disadvantaged by increasing complexity only for the native and high intelligibility foreign-accented talkers, whereas no such effect was found for the low intelligibility foreign-accented talker. This pattern emerged across conditions: low and high signal-to-noise ratios, mixed and blocked stimulus presentation, and in the absence of a major cue to prosodic structure, the natural pitch contour of the sentences. Moreover, the pattern generalized to a different set of three talkers that matched the intelligibility of the original talkers. Taken together, the results in this study suggest that listeners employ qualitatively different speech processing strategies for low- versus high-intelligibility foreign-accented talkers, with sentence-related linguistic factors only emerging for speech over a threshold of intelligibility. Findings are discussed in the context of alternative accounts.

Year:  2020        PMID: 32611135      PMCID: PMC7275869          DOI: 10.1121/10.0001194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  51 in total

1.  The effects of a flattened fundamental frequency on intelligibility at the sentence level.

Authors:  J S Laures; G Weismer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Effects of noise and speech intelligibility on listener comprehension and processing time of Korean-accented English.

Authors:  Erin O'Brien Wilson; Tammie J Spaulding
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Cognition counts: a working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU).

Authors:  Jerker Rönnberg; Mary Rudner; Catharina Foo; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Intelligibility of foreign-accented speech for older adults with and without hearing loss.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Allard Jongman; Joan A Sereno; Kyung Ae Keum
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Evaluation of the NAL Dynamic Conversations Test in older listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Gitte Keidser; Katrina Freeston; Jörg M Buchholz
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  The Wildcat Corpus of native- and foreign-accented English: communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Melissa Baese-Berk; Rachel E Baker; Arim Choi; Midam Kim; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.500

8.  Effects of age and hearing loss on recognition of unaccented and accented multisyllabic words.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Peter J Fitzgibbons; Julie I Cohen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances.

Authors:  Jerker Rönnberg; Thomas Lunner; Adriana Zekveld; Patrik Sörqvist; Henrik Danielsson; Björn Lyxell; Orjan Dahlström; Carine Signoret; Stefan Stenfelt; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Mary Rudner
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-13
View more
  2 in total

1.  FORUM: Remote testing for psychological and physiological acoustics.

Authors:  Z Ellen Peng; Sebastian Waz; Emily Buss; Yi Shen; Virginia Richards; Hari Bharadwaj; G Christopher Stecker; Jordan A Beim; Adam K Bosen; Meredith D Braza; Anna C Diedesch; Claire M Dorey; Andrew R Dykstra; Frederick J Gallun; Raymond L Goldsworthy; Lincoln Gray; Eric C Hoover; Antje Ihlefeld; Thomas Koelewijn; Judy G Kopun; Juraj Mesik; Daniel E Shub; Jonathan H Venezia
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

2.  Listening in the Moment: How Bilingualism Interacts With Task Demands to Shape Active Listening.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Adam Tierney; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.