Literature DB >> 28825512

What Are Optimal Cesarean Section Rates in the U.S. and How Do We Get There? A Review of Evidence-Based Recommendations and Interventions.

Diana Montoya-Williams1, Dominick J Lemas2, Lisa Spiryda3, Keval Patel4, Josef Neu1, Tiffany L Carson5.   

Abstract

Cesarean sections (CSs) are the most commonly performed surgical procedures in the world today. Global epidemiological studies from the last decade suggest that the optimal CS rates in developed countries exist somewhere between 15% and 19%. Despite these findings, CS rates in the United States have remained stable at slightly over 32% over the past 10 years. Using primary and secondary literature published from 2010 to 2015, this review discusses how optimal CS rates were developed. In addition, we define a category of potentially avoidable CS (i.e., those conducted on nulliparous low-risk women who present with vertex infants at term) and explore how CS in this population appear to be one of the main drivers of high CS rates overall. The institutional, provider, and patient-related factors, which may be related to higher-than-recommended rates of CS, particularly those conducted in low-risk women, will be discussed. This review will then delve into clinician and patient-oriented interventions that have been shown to effectively reduce the rate of potentially avoidable CS. Our analysis showed that large-scale, multifaceted interventions that include audit and feedback cycles as well as peer review strategies were the most effective in decreasing rates of potentially avoidable CS. This review concludes with an agenda for future research into interventions that aim to achieve optimal CS rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-sections; asthma; cesarean sections; diabetes; obesity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28825512      PMCID: PMC7643764          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  51 in total

1.  Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery Rate and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality.

Authors:  George Molina; Thomas G Weiser; Stuart R Lipsitz; Micaela M Esquivel; Tarsicio Uribe-Leitz; Tej Azad; Neel Shah; Katherine Semrau; William R Berry; Atul A Gawande; Alex B Haynes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low-, medium-, and high-income countries: an ecological study.

Authors:  Fernando Althabe; Claudio Sosa; José M Belizán; Luz Gibbons; Frederique Jacquerioz; Eduardo Bergel
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.689

3.  Lowered national cesarean section rates after a concerted action.

Authors:  Diogo Ayres-De-Campos; Joana Cruz; Claudia Medeiros-Borges; Cristina Costa-Santos; Lisa Vicente
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 4.  Interrelations between four antepartum obstetric interventions and cesarean delivery in women at low risk: a systematic review and modeling of the cascade of interventions.

Authors:  Michel Rossignol; Nils Chaillet; Faiza Boughrassa; Jean-Marie Moutquin
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.689

5.  Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Lisbet S Lundsberg; Kathleen Belanger; Christian M Pettker; Edmund F Funai; Jessica L Illuzzi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Oxytocin: new perspectives on an old drug.

Authors:  Steven L Clark; Kathleen Rice Simpson; G Eric Knox; Thomas J Garite
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Developing criteria for cesarean section using the RAND appropriateness method.

Authors:  Rahim Ostovar; Arash Rashidian; Abolghasem Pourreza; Batool Hossein Rashidi; Sedigheh Hantooshzadeh; Hassan Eftekhar Ardebili; Mahmood Mahmoudi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).

Authors:  Loïc Sentilhes; Christophe Vayssière; Gael Beucher; Catherine Deneux-Tharaux; Philippe Deruelle; Pierre Diemunsch; Denis Gallot; Jean-Baptiste Haumonté; Sonia Heimann; Gilles Kayem; Emmanuel Lopez; Olivier Parant; Thomas Schmitz; Yann Sellier; Patrick Rozenberg; Claude d'Ercole
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Disparities in cesarean delivery by ethnicity and nativity in New York city.

Authors:  T Janevic; E Loftfield; D A Savitz; E Bradley; J Illuzzi; H Lipkind
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-01

Review 10.  What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betran; Maria Regina Torloni; Jun Zhang; Jiangfeng Ye; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Catherine Deneux-Tharaux; Olufemi Taiwo Oladapo; João Paulo Souza; Özge Tunçalp; Joshua Peter Vogel; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 3.223

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  The Neonatal Microbiome and Its Partial Role in Mediating the Association between Birth by Cesarean Section and Adverse Pediatric Outcomes.

Authors:  Diana Montoya-Williams; Dominick J Lemas; Lisa Spiryda; Keval Patel; O'neshia Olivia Carney; Josef Neu; Tiffany L Carson
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  The risk of childhood brain tumors associated with delivery interventions: A Danish matched case-control study.

Authors:  Karen W Yeh; Di He; Johnni Hansen; Catherine L Carpenter; Beate Ritz; Jorn Olsen; Julia E Heck
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Variability in cesarean delivery rates among individual labor and delivery nurses compared to physicians at three attribution time points.

Authors:  Joyce K Edmonds; Amber Weiseth; Brandon J Neal; Samuel R Woodbury; Kate Miller; Vivenne Souter; Neel T Shah
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  The effect of advanced maternal age on perinatal outcomes in nulliparous singleton pregnancies.

Authors:  Bekir Kahveci; Rauf Melekoglu; Ismail Cuneyt Evruke; Cihan Cetin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Long-term effect of pregnancy-related factors on the development of endometrial neoplasia: A nationwide retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hyun-Woong Cho; Yung-Taek Ouh; Kyu-Min Lee; Sung Won Han; Jae Kwan Lee; Geum Jun Cho; Jin Hwa Hong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Postnatal pediatric systemic antibiotic episodes during the first three years of life are not associated with mode of delivery.

Authors:  Dominick J Lemas; Jasmine A Mack; Jennifer J Schoch; Nicole Cacho; Elizabeth Plasencia; Alice S Rhoton-Vlasak; Josef Neu; Lindsay Thompson; Magda Francois; Keval Patel; William R Hogan; Gloria P Lipori; Matthew J Gurka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Spontaneous vaginal birth varies significantly across US hospitals.

Authors:  Rebecca R S Clark; Eileen T Lake
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.689

8.  Predictors of the recurrence of surgically removed previous caesarean skin scars at caesarean section: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  İhsan Bağlı; Rei Ogawa; Sait Bakır; Cuma Taşın; Ayhan Yıldırım; Ece Öcal; Mustafa Yavuz; Mesut Bala; Gökçe Turan
Journal:  Scars Burn Heal       Date:  2021-06-25

9.  Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in a comprehensive specialized hospital of Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study; 2020.

Authors:  Moges Gelaw Taye; Firehiwot Nega; Metages Hunie Belay; Simegnew Kibret; Yewlsew Fentie; Wondimnew Desalegn Addis; Efrem Fenta
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.