Literature DB >> 21646928

Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate.

Emma L Barber1, Lisbet S Lundsberg, Kathleen Belanger, Christian M Pettker, Edmund F Funai, Jessica L Illuzzi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine physician-documented indications for cesarean delivery in order to investigate the specific factors contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate.
METHODS: We analyzed rates of primary and repeat cesarean delivery, including indications for the procedure, among 32,443 live births at a major academic hospital between 2003 and 2009. Time trends for each indication were modeled to estimate the absolute and cumulative annualized relative risk of cesarean by indication over time and the relative contribution of each indication to the overall increase in primary cesarean delivery rate.
RESULTS: The cesarean delivery rate increased from 26% to 36.5% between 2003 and 2009; 50.0% of the increase was attributable to an increase in primary cesarean delivery. Among the documented indications, nonreassuring fetal status, arrest of dilation, multiple gestation, preeclampsia, suspected macrosomia, and maternal request increased over time, whereas arrest of descent, malpresentation, maternal-fetal indications, and other obstetric indications (eg, cord prolapse, placenta previa) did not increase. The relative contributions of each indication to the total increase in primary cesarean rate were: nonreassuring fetal status (32%), labor arrest disorders (18%), multiple gestation (16%), suspected macrosomia (10%), preeclampsia (10%), maternal request (8%), maternal-fetal conditions (5%), and other obstetric conditions (1%).
CONCLUSION: Primary cesarean births accounted for 50% of the increasing cesarean rate. Among primary cesarean deliveries, more subjective indications (nonreassuring fetal status and arrest of dilation) contributed larger proportions than more objective indications (malpresentation, maternal-fetal, and obstetric conditions).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21646928      PMCID: PMC3751192          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  34 in total

1.  Approach VBAC deliveries cautiously, experts say.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hosp Peer Rev       Date:  1998-10

2.  ACOG Committee Opinion. Surgery and patient choice: the ethics of decision making.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery.

Authors:  M Lydon-Rochelle; V L Holt; T R Easterling; D P Martin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Interpreting the fetal heart rate tracing. Effect of knowledge of neonatal outcome.

Authors:  H A Zain; J W Wright; G E Parrish; S J Diehl
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 0.142

5.  Committee opinion. Induction of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  The reproducibility of intrapartum cardiotocogram assessments.

Authors:  M D Beaulieu; J Fabia; B Leduc; J Brisson; A Bastide; D Blouin; R J Gauthier; A Lalonde
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1982-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Vaginal birth after cesarean birth--California, 1996-2000.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2002-11-08       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  Contribution of excess weight gain during pregnancy and macrosomia to the cesarean delivery rate, 1990-2000.

Authors:  Julia C Rhodes; Kenneth C Schoendorf; Jennifer D Parker
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.561

10.  Intra- and inter-observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms.

Authors:  P V Nielsen; B Stigsby; C Nickelsen; J Nim
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.636

View more
  135 in total

1.  Decision Making About Method of Delivery on the U.S.-Mexico Border.

Authors:  Carla L DeSisto; Jill A McDonald; Roger Rochat; Beatriz A Diaz-Apodaca; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2014-12-20

Review 2.  Caesarean Delivery Rate Review: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors:  N Degani; N Sikich
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2015-03-01

3.  Optode Design Space Exploration for Clinically-robust Non-invasive Fetal Oximetry.

Authors:  Daniel D Fong; Vivek J Srinivasan; Kourosh Vali; Soheil Ghiasi
Journal:  ACM Trans Embed Comput Syst       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 1.193

4.  Maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States: where are we now?

Authors:  Andreea A Creanga; Cynthia J Berg; Jean Y Ko; Sherry L Farr; Van T Tong; F Carol Bruce; William M Callaghan
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Applying a physiologic partograph to Consortium on Safe Labor data to identify opportunities for safely decreasing cesarean births among nulliparous women.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Nancy K Lowe; Aaron B Caughey; Kelly A Bennett; Ellen L Tilden; Nicole S Carlson; Julia C Phillippi; Mary S Dietrich
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.689

6.  Using the Robson 10-Group Classification System to Compare Cesarean Birth Utilization Between US Centers With and Without Midwives.

Authors:  Denise Colter Smith; Julia C Phillippi; Nancy K Lowe; Rachel Blankstein Breman; Nicole S Carlson; Jeremy L Neal; Eric Gutierrez; Ellen L Tilden
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  Decisions to Perform Emergency Caesarean Sections at a University Hospital: Do obstetricians agree?

Authors:  Silja A Pillai; Gowri Vaidyanathan; Maryam Al-Shukri; Tamima R Al-Dughaishi; Shahila Tazneem; Durdana Khan; Saniya El-Tayeb; Mariam Mathew
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2016-02-02

Review 8.  Prevention of the first cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Predictors of postpartum sexual activity and function in a diverse population of women.

Authors:  Lynn M Yee; Anjali J Kaimal; Sanae Nakagawa; Kathryn Houston; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.388

10.  Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issues.

Authors:  Katy Backes Kozhimannil; Michael R Law; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.301

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.