Literature DB >> 25783672

Lowered national cesarean section rates after a concerted action.

Diogo Ayres-De-Campos1, Joana Cruz, Claudia Medeiros-Borges, Cristina Costa-Santos, Lisa Vicente.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate national cesarean section (CS) rates and other obstetric indicators after a concerted action to reduce CS rates was undertaken in Portugal from 2010 onwards. This action was based on the transmission of information and training of healthcare professionals, together with the inclusion of CS rates as a criterion for hospital funding.
DESIGN: Retrospective observational population-based study.
SETTING: Portugal. POPULATION: Births occurring in Portugal between 2000 and 2014.
METHODS: Governmental sources were used to obtain data on national CS, perinatal and maternal mortality rates. Rates of instrumental vaginal delivery, vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), hypoxia-related complications and perineal lacerations were retrieved for state-owned hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CS, perinatal and maternal mortality, instrumental vaginal delivery, VBAC, hypoxia-related complications and perineal lacerations.
RESULTS: After a continuous rise between 2000 and 2009, national CS rates declined significantly over the following 5 years (36.6% vs. 33.1%, time trend p ≤ 0.001). Perinatal mortality maintained a downward trend during this period, while maternal mortality remained unchanged. Rates of instrumental vaginal delivery, VBAC and perineal lacerations increased, while the incidence of hypoxia-related complications decreased.
CONCLUSIONS: A concerted action based on the transmission of information and training of healthcare professionals, together with the inclusion of CS rates as a criterion for hospital funding, was followed by a significant reduction in national CS rates, as well as an improvement in most related obstetric indicators. There may be an association between the reported intervention and the observed changes.
© 2015 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section; extraction; labor complications; maternal health services; parturition; vaginal birth after cesarean

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25783672     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  10 in total

Review 1.  What Are Optimal Cesarean Section Rates in the U.S. and How Do We Get There? A Review of Evidence-Based Recommendations and Interventions.

Authors:  Diana Montoya-Williams; Dominick J Lemas; Lisa Spiryda; Keval Patel; Josef Neu; Tiffany L Carson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Factors Associated with the Type of Cesarean Section in Greece and Their Correlation with International Guidelines.

Authors:  Evangelia Antoniou; Eirini Orovou; Maria Iliadou; Angeliki Sarella; Ermioni Palaska; Antigoni Sarantaki; Georgios Iatrakis; Maria Dagla
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2021-03

Review 3.  Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.

Authors:  Innie Chen; Newton Opiyo; Emma Tavender; Sameh Mortazhejri; Tamara Rader; Jennifer Petkovic; Sharlini Yogasingam; Monica Taljaard; Sugandha Agarwal; Malinee Laopaiboon; Jason Wasiak; Suthit Khunpradit; Pisake Lumbiganon; Russell L Gruen; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-28

4.  Adjunct clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean rates: systematic review.

Authors:  Aireen Wingert; Cydney Johnson; Robin Featherstone; Meghan Sebastianski; Lisa Hartling; R Douglas Wilson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  A cluster-randomized field trial to reduce cesarean section rates with a multifaceted intervention in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Lulu Zhang; Lin Zhang; Meng Li; Jie Xi; Xiaohua Zhang; Zhenni Meng; Ying Wang; Huaping Li; Xiaohua Liu; Feihua Ju; Yuping Lu; Huijun Tang; Xianju Qin; Yanhong Ming; Rong Huang; Guohong Li; Hongying Dai; Rong Zhang; Min Qin; Liping Zhu; Jun Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Training and financial intervention for encouraging maternal health service utilization: Results of cluster randomized trials in Shaanxi Province.

Authors:  Yuan Shen; Qiang Li; Xiaoning Liu; Shengbin Xiao; Hong Yan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Evaluation of Hospital Cesarean Delivery-Related Profits and Rates in the United States.

Authors:  Rie Sakai-Bizmark; Michael G Ross; Dennys Estevez; Lauren E M Bedel; Emily H Marr; Yusuke Tsugawa
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-03-01

8.  Spatial Access Matters: An Analysis of Policy Change and Its Effects on Avoidable Infant Mortality in Portugal.

Authors:  Morgan Weiland; Paula Santana; Claudia Costa; Julia Doetsch; Eva Pilot
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Variation in hospital caesarean section rates for women with at least one previous caesarean section: a population based cohort study.

Authors:  Kathrin Schemann; Jillian A Patterson; Tanya A Nippita; Jane B Ford; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Factors contributing to the rapid rise of caesarean section: a prospective study of primiparous Chinese women in Shanghai.

Authors:  Honglei Ji; Hong Jiang; Limin Yang; Xu Qian; Shenglan Tang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.