Emma C Johnson1, Richard Border2, Whitney E Melroy-Greif3, Christiaan A de Leeuw4, Marissa A Ehringer5, Matthew C Keller2. 1. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado; Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado. Electronic address: emma.c.johnson@colorado.edu. 2. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado; Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado. 3. Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California. 4. Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Centre for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research/VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam; Institute for Computing and Information Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 5. Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado; Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A recent analysis of 25 historical candidate gene polymorphisms for schizophrenia in the largest genome-wide association study conducted to date suggested that these commonly studied variants were no more associated with the disorder than would be expected by chance. However, the same study identified other variants within those candidate genes that demonstrated genome-wide significant associations with schizophrenia. As such, it is possible that variants within historic schizophrenia candidate genes are associated with schizophrenia at levels above those expected by chance, even if the most-studied specific polymorphisms are not. METHODS: The present study used association statistics from the largest schizophrenia genome-wide association study conducted to date as input to a gene set analysis to investigate whether variants within schizophrenia candidate genes are enriched for association with schizophrenia. RESULTS: As a group, variants in the most-studied candidate genes were no more associated with schizophrenia than were variants in control sets of noncandidate genes. While a small subset of candidate genes did appear to be significantly associated with schizophrenia, these genes were not particularly noteworthy given the large number of more strongly associated noncandidate genes. CONCLUSIONS: The history of schizophrenia research should serve as a cautionary tale to candidate gene investigators examining other phenotypes: our findings indicate that the most investigated candidate gene hypotheses of schizophrenia are not well supported by genome-wide association studies, and it is likely that this will be the case for other complex traits as well.
BACKGROUND: A recent analysis of 25 historical candidate gene polymorphisms for schizophrenia in the largest genome-wide association study conducted to date suggested that these commonly studied variants were no more associated with the disorder than would be expected by chance. However, the same study identified other variants within those candidate genes that demonstrated genome-wide significant associations with schizophrenia. As such, it is possible that variants within historic schizophrenia candidate genes are associated with schizophrenia at levels above those expected by chance, even if the most-studied specific polymorphisms are not. METHODS: The present study used association statistics from the largest schizophrenia genome-wide association study conducted to date as input to a gene set analysis to investigate whether variants within schizophrenia candidate genes are enriched for association with schizophrenia. RESULTS: As a group, variants in the most-studied candidate genes were no more associated with schizophrenia than were variants in control sets of noncandidate genes. While a small subset of candidate genes did appear to be significantly associated with schizophrenia, these genes were not particularly noteworthy given the large number of more strongly associated noncandidate genes. CONCLUSIONS: The history of schizophrenia research should serve as a cautionary tale to candidate gene investigators examining other phenotypes: our findings indicate that the most investigated candidate gene hypotheses of schizophrenia are not well supported by genome-wide association studies, and it is likely that this will be the case for other complex traits as well.
Authors: Nicole C Allen; Sachin Bagade; Matthew B McQueen; John P A Ioannidis; Fotini K Kavvoura; Muin J Khoury; Rudolph E Tanzi; Lars Bertram Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Mousumi Mutsuddi; Derek W Morris; Skye G Waggoner; Mark J Daly; Edward M Scolnick; Pamela Sklar Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2006-10-03 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: J K Millar; J C Wilson-Annan; S Anderson; S Christie; M S Taylor; C A Semple; R S Devon; D M St Clair; W J Muir; D H Blackwood; D J Porteous Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2000-05-22 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Lynnette A Averill; Christopher L Averill; Benjamin Kelmendi; Chadi G Abdallah; Steven M Southwick Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Richard Border; Emma C Johnson; Luke M Evans; Andrew Smolen; Noah Berley; Patrick F Sullivan; Matthew C Keller Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Luke M Evans; Emma C Johnson; Whitney E Melroy-Greif; John K Hewitt; Charles A Hoeffer; Matthew C Keller; Laura M Saba; Jerry A Stitzel; Marissa A Ehringer Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-07-16 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Donna M Werling; Harrison Brand; Joon-Yong An; Matthew R Stone; Lingxue Zhu; Joseph T Glessner; Ryan L Collins; Shan Dong; Ryan M Layer; Eirene Markenscoff-Papadimitriou; Andrew Farrell; Grace B Schwartz; Harold Z Wang; Benjamin B Currall; Xuefang Zhao; Jeanselle Dea; Clif Duhn; Carolyn A Erdman; Michael C Gilson; Rachita Yadav; Robert E Handsaker; Seva Kashin; Lambertus Klei; Jeffrey D Mandell; Tomasz J Nowakowski; Yuwen Liu; Sirisha Pochareddy; Louw Smith; Michael F Walker; Matthew J Waterman; Xin He; Arnold R Kriegstein; John L Rubenstein; Nenad Sestan; Steven A McCarroll; Benjamin M Neale; Hilary Coon; A Jeremy Willsey; Joseph D Buxbaum; Mark J Daly; Matthew W State; Aaron R Quinlan; Gabor T Marth; Kathryn Roeder; Bernie Devlin; Michael E Talkowski; Stephan J Sanders Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Sarah Ellen Braun; Dana Lapato; Roy E Brown; Eva Lancaster; Timothy P York; Ananda B Amstadter; Patricia A Kinser Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 8.989