Literature DB >> 28814633

Variance in exposed perturbations impairs retention of visuomotor adaptation.

Cesar Augusto Canaveral1, Frédéric Danion2, Félix Berrigan1, Pierre-Michel Bernier3.   

Abstract

Sensorimotor control requires an accurate estimate of the state of the body. The brain optimizes state estimation by combining sensory signals with predictions of the sensory consequences of motor commands using a forward model. Given that both sensory signals and predictions are uncertain (i.e., noisy), the brain optimally weights the relative reliance on each source of information during adaptation. In support, it is known that uncertainty in the sensory predictions influences the rate and generalization of visuomotor adaptation. We investigated whether uncertainty in the sensory predictions affects the retention of a new visuomotor relationship. This was done by exposing three separate groups to a visuomotor rotation whose mean was common at 15° counterclockwise but whose variance around the mean differed (i.e., SD of 0°, 3.2°, or 4.5°). Retention was assessed by measuring the persistence of the adapted behavior in a no-vision phase. Results revealed that mean reach direction late in adaptation was similar across groups, suggesting it depended mainly on the mean of exposed rotations and was robust to differences in variance. However, retention differed across groups, with higher levels of variance being associated with a more rapid reversion toward nonadapted behavior. A control experiment ruled out the possibility that differences in retention were accounted for by differences in success rates. Exposure to variable rotations may have increased the uncertainty in sensory predictions, making the adapted forward model more labile and susceptible to change or decay.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The brain predicts the sensory consequences of motor commands through a forward model. These predictions are subject to uncertainty. We use visuomotor adaptation and modulate uncertainty in the sensory predictions by manipulating the variance in exposed rotations. Results reveal that variance does not influence the final extent of adaptation but selectively impairs the retention of motor memories. These results suggest that a more uncertain forward model is more susceptible to change or decay.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arm reaching movement; retention; sensorimotor adaptation; uncertainty; visuomotor rotation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28814633      PMCID: PMC5675903          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00416.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  44 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Long-term retention explained by a model of short-term learning in the adaptive control of reaching.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Reward feedback accelerates motor learning.

Authors:  Ali A Nikooyan; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Claude Ghez; M Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation.

Authors:  T A Martin; J G Keating; H P Goodkin; A J Bastian; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Uncertainty of feedback and state estimation determines the speed of motor adaptation.

Authors:  Kunlin Wei; Konrad Körding
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Overcoming motor "forgetting" through reinforcement of learned actions.

Authors:  Lior Shmuelof; Vincent S Huang; Adrian M Haith; Raymond J Delnicki; Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Post-Movement Beta Activity in Sensorimotor Cortex Indexes Confidence in the Estimations from Internal Models.

Authors:  Huiling Tan; Cian Wade; Peter Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Generalization of stochastic visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Hugo L Fernandes; Ian H Stevenson; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Luring the Motor System: Impact of Performance-Contingent Incentives on Pre-Movement Beta-Band Activity and Motor Performance.

Authors:  Félix-Antoine Savoie; Raphaël Hamel; Angélina Lacroix; François Thénault; Kevin Whittingstall; Pierre-Michel Bernier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  A tale of too many tasks: task fragmentation in motor learning and a call for model task paradigms.

Authors:  Rajiv Ranganathan; Aimee D Tomlinson; Rakshith Lokesh; Tzu-Hsiang Lin; Priya Patel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Joint speed feedback improves myoelectric prosthesis adaptation after perturbed reaches in non amputees.

Authors:  Eric J Earley; Reva E Johnson; Jonathon W Sensinger; Levi J Hargrove
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.