Literature DB >> 33664421

Joint speed feedback improves myoelectric prosthesis adaptation after perturbed reaches in non amputees.

Eric J Earley1,2, Reva E Johnson3, Jonathon W Sensinger4,5, Levi J Hargrove6,7,8.   

Abstract

Accurate control of human limbs involves both feedforward and feedback signals. For prosthetic arms, feedforward control is commonly accomplished by recording myoelectric signals from the residual limb to predict the user's intent, but augmented feedback signals are not explicitly provided in commercial devices. Previous studies have demonstrated inconsistent results when artificial feedback was provided in the presence of vision; some studies showed benefits, while others did not. We hypothesized that negligible benefits in past studies may have been due to artificial feedback with low precision compared to vision, which results in heavy reliance on vision during reaching tasks. Furthermore, we anticipated more reliable benefits from artificial feedback when providing information that vision estimates with high uncertainty (e.g. joint speed). In this study, we test an artificial sensory feedback system providing joint speed information and how it impacts performance and adaptation during a hybrid positional-and-myoelectric ballistic reaching task. We found that overall reaching errors were reduced after perturbed control, but did not significantly improve steady-state reaches. Furthermore, we found that feedback about the joint speed of the myoelectric prosthesis control improved the adaptation rate of biological limb movements, which may have resulted from high prosthesis control noise and strategic overreaching with the positional control and underreaching with the myoelectric control. These results provide insights into the relevant factors influencing the improvements conferred by artificial sensory feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33664421      PMCID: PMC7970849          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84795-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  48 in total

1.  Combining sensory information: mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses.

Authors:  J M Hillis; M O Ernst; M S Banks; M S Landy
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Biomimetic Intraneural Sensory Feedback Enhances Sensation Naturalness, Tactile Sensitivity, and Manual Dexterity in a Bidirectional Prosthesis.

Authors:  Giacomo Valle; Alberto Mazzoni; Francesco Iberite; Edoardo D'Anna; Ivo Strauss; Giuseppe Granata; Marco Controzzi; Francesco Clemente; Giulio Rognini; Christian Cipriani; Thomas Stieglitz; Francesco Maria Petrini; Paolo Maria Rossini; Silvestro Micera
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Evaluation of Tactile Feedback Methods for Wrist Rotation Guidance.

Authors:  A A Stanley; K J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.487

4.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts.

Authors:  R A Schmidt; H Zelaznik; B Hawkins; J S Frank; J T Quinn
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Noise characteristics and prior expectations in human visual speed perception.

Authors:  Alan A Stocker; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-19       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Modeling Expected Reaching Error and Behaviors for Motor Adaptation.

Authors:  Eric J Earley; Levi J Hargrove
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2019-07

7.  The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control.

Authors:  Ian Saunders; Sethu Vijayakumar
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Joint Speed Discrimination and Augmentation For Prosthesis Feedback.

Authors:  Eric J Earley; Reva E Johnson; Levi J Hargrove; Jon W Sensinger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Myocontrol is closed-loop control: incidental feedback is sufficient for scaling the prosthesis force in routine grasping.

Authors:  Marko Markovic; Meike A Schweisfurth; Leonard F Engels; Dario Farina; Strahinja Dosen
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sensory substitution of elbow proprioception to improve myoelectric control of upper limb prosthesis: experiment on healthy subjects and amputees.

Authors:  Matthieu Guémann; Christophe Halgand; Aurélia Bastier; Céline Lansade; Léo Borrini; Éric Lapeyre; Daniel Cattaert; Aymar de Rugy
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 5.208

2.  Competitive motivation increased home use and improved prosthesis self-perception after Cybathlon 2020 for neuromusculoskeletal prosthesis user.

Authors:  Eric J Earley; Jan Zbinden; Maria Munoz-Novoa; Enzo Mastinu; Andrew Smiles; Max Ortiz-Catalan
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 5.208

3.  EMG feedback outperforms force feedback in the presence of prosthesis control disturbance.

Authors:  Jack Tchimino; Jakob Lund Dideriksen; Strahinja Dosen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 5.152

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.