Literature DB >> 28796238

A proposed approach to accelerate evidence generation for genomic-based technologies in the context of a learning health system.

Christine Y Lu1, Marc S Williams2, Geoffrey S Ginsburg3, Sengwee Toh1, Jeff S Brown1, Muin J Khoury4.   

Abstract

Genomic technologies should demonstrate analytical and clinical validity and clinical utility prior to wider adoption in clinical practice. However, the question of clinical utility remains unanswered for many genomic technologies. In this paper, we propose three building blocks for rapid generation of evidence on clinical utility of promising genomic technologies that underpin clinical and policy decisions. We define promising genomic tests as those that have proven analytical and clinical validity. First, risk-sharing agreements could be implemented between payers and manufacturers to enable temporary coverage that would help incorporate promising technologies into routine clinical care. Second, existing data networks, such as the Sentinel Initiative and the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) could be leveraged, augmented with genomic information to track the use of genomic technologies and monitor clinical outcomes in millions of people. Third, endorsement and engagement from key stakeholders will be needed to establish this collaborative model for rapid evidence generation; all stakeholders will benefit from better information regarding the clinical utility of these technologies. This collaborative model can create a multipurpose and reusable national resource that generates knowledge from data gathered as part of routine care to drive evidence-based clinical practice and health system changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28796238     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  42 in total

1.  Convergence of Implementation Science, Precision Medicine, and the Learning Health Care System: A New Model for Biomedical Research.

Authors:  David A Chambers; W Gregory Feero; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Warfarin genotyping reduces hospitalization rates results from the MM-WES (Medco-Mayo Warfarin Effectiveness study).

Authors:  Robert S Epstein; Thomas P Moyer; Ronald E Aubert; Dennis J O Kane; Fang Xia; Robert R Verbrugge; Brian F Gage; J Russell Teagarden
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Privacy-preserving analytic methods for multisite comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research.

Authors:  Sengwee Toh; Susan Shetterly; John D Powers; David Arterburn
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  A pharmacogenetic versus a clinical algorithm for warfarin dosing.

Authors:  Stephen E Kimmel; Benjamin French; Scott E Kasner; Julie A Johnson; Jeffrey L Anderson; Brian F Gage; Yves D Rosenberg; Charles S Eby; Rosemary A Madigan; Robert B McBane; Sherif Z Abdel-Rahman; Scott M Stevens; Steven Yale; Emile R Mohler; Margaret C Fang; Vinay Shah; Richard B Horenstein; Nita A Limdi; James A S Muldowney; Jaspal Gujral; Patrice Delafontaine; Robert J Desnick; Thomas L Ortel; Henny H Billett; Robert C Pendleton; Nancy L Geller; Jonathan L Halperin; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael D Caldwell; Robert M Califf; Jonas H Ellenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Guidance for researchers developing and conducting clinical trials in practice-based research networks (PBRNs).

Authors:  Rowena J Dolor; Kristine M Schmit; Deborah G Graham; Chester H Fox; Laura Mae Baldwin
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

6.  Assessing patient readiness for the clinical adoption of personalized medicine.

Authors:  A M Issa; W Tufail; J Hutchinson; J Tenorio; M Poonam Baliga
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Consideration of patient preferences and challenges in storage and access of pharmacogenetic test results.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Kensaku Kawamoto; Robert Agans; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Initiative: methods of the EGAPP Working Group.

Authors:  Steven M Teutsch; Linda A Bradley; Glenn E Palomaki; James E Haddow; Margaret Piper; Ned Calonge; W David Dotson; Michael P Douglas; Alfred O Berg
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Patient access schemes in Asia-pacific markets: current experience and future potential.

Authors:  Christine Y Lu; Caitlin Lupton; Shana Rakowsky; Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Anita K Wagner
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2015-02-16

Review 10.  Making genomic medicine evidence-based and patient-centered: a structured review and landscape analysis of comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Patricia A Deverka; Harold C Sox; Muin J Khoury; Lewis G Sandy; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Sean R Tunis; Lori A Orlando; Michael P Douglas
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Building evidence and measuring clinical outcomes for genomic medicine.

Authors:  Josh F Peterson; Dan M Roden; Lori A Orlando; Andrea H Ramirez; George A Mensah; Marc S Williams
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Enhancing diversity to reduce health information disparities and build an evidence base for genomic medicine.

Authors:  Lucia A Hindorff; Vence L Bonham; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 3.  Improving recommendations for genomic medicine: building an evolutionary process from clinical practice advisory documents to guidelines.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Ellen Wright Clayton; Susan M Wolf; Susan A Berry; Barbara J Evans; James P Evans; Ralph Hall; Diane Korngiebel; Anne-Marie Laberge; Bonnie S LeRoy; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 4.  Opportunities and challenges for the computational interpretation of rare variation in clinically important genes.

Authors:  Gregory McInnes; Andrew G Sharo; Megan L Koleske; Julia E H Brown; Matthew Norstad; Aashish N Adhikari; Sheng Wang; Steven E Brenner; Jodi Halpern; Barbara A Koenig; David C Magnus; Renata C Gallagher; Kathleen M Giacomini; Russ B Altman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Governing Personalized Health: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Philipp Trein; Joël Wagner
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 6.  Identifying requisite learning health system competencies: a scoping review.

Authors:  Paige L McDonald; Jessica Phillips; Kenneth Harwood; Joyce Maring; Philip J van der Wees
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  A collaborative translational research framework for evaluating and implementing the appropriate use of human genome sequencing to improve health.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; W Gregory Feero; David A Chambers; Lawrence C Brody; Nazneen Aziz; Robert C Green; A Cecile J W Janssens; Michael F Murray; Laura Lyman Rodriguez; Joni L Rutter; Sheri D Schully; Deborah M Winn; George A Mensah
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Generating evidence for precision medicine: considerations made by the Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics Consortium when designing and operationalizing the PREPARE study.

Authors:  Cathelijne H van der Wouden; Stefan Böhringer; Erika Cecchin; Ka-Chun Cheung; Cristina Lucía Dávila-Fajardo; Vera H M Deneer; Vita Dolžan; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg; Siv Jönsson; Mats O Karlsson; Marjolein Kriek; Christina Mitropoulou; George P Patrinos; Munir Pirmohamed; Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag; Matthias Samwald; Matthias Schwab; Daniela Steinberger; Julia Stingl; Gere Sunder-Plassmann; Giuseppe Toffoli; Richard M Turner; Mandy H van Rhenen; Erik van Zwet; Jesse J Swen; Henk-Jan Guchelaar
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 9.  Personalized early detection and prevention of breast cancer: ENVISION consensus statement.

Authors:  Nora Pashayan; Antonis C Antoniou; Urska Ivanus; Laura J Esserman; Douglas F Easton; David French; Gaby Sroczynski; Per Hall; Jack Cuzick; D Gareth Evans; Jacques Simard; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Rita Schmutzler; Odette Wegwarth; Paul Pharoah; Sowmiya Moorthie; Sandrine De Montgolfier; Camille Baron; Zdenko Herceg; Clare Turnbull; Corinne Balleyguier; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Jelle Wesseling; David Ritchie; Marc Tischkowitz; Mireille Broeders; Dan Reisel; Andres Metspalu; Thomas Callender; Harry de Koning; Peter Devilee; Suzette Delaloge; Marjanka K Schmidt; Martin Widschwendter
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 65.011

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.