Literature DB >> 19204419

Assessing patient readiness for the clinical adoption of personalized medicine.

A M Issa1, W Tufail, J Hutchinson, J Tenorio, M Poonam Baliga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although pharmacogenomics-based diagnostics and therapeutics are increasingly being translated into personalized medicine applications, relatively little evidence exists about how novel pharmacogenomics-based technologies will be accepted and adopted by patients. It is important to understand the characteristics of genomic diagnostics and targeted therapeutics that might impact utilization or serve as barriers to adoption of these novel technologies in order to formulate appropriate policies and procedures. The objective of this study was to investigate patients' understanding and knowledge of personalized medicine and the process of decision-making regarding pharmacogenomics testing and targeted therapeutics and to better understand how patients value receiving pharmacogenomics-based care.
METHODS: We conducted 4 focus groups with 8-10 individuals in each group with patients recruited from out-patient clinics at The Methodist Hospital in Houston, Tex., USA.
RESULTS: The use of genomic diagnostics and targeted therapeutics to facilitate personalized medicine has considerable support from patients. However, our data revealed that participants were concerned with issues surrounding privacy and confidentiality of genetic test results, particularly with respect to access of information by insurers, with potential costs of testing and issues related to accuracy of test results. Questions regarding willingness to pay revealed that patients would be more willing to pay out-of-pocket if the disease associated with pharmacogenomic testing for treatment was perceived to be high risk (e.g., colorectal cancer) versus a chronic condition that was perceived as lower risk (e.g., high cholesterol).
CONCLUSION: As the personalized medicine approach is increasingly incorporated into health care, understanding patients' needs and their readiness to adopt these novel technologies will become progressively more important for the development of appropriate health policies. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19204419     DOI: 10.1159/000189629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  20 in total

1.  The potential impact of pharmacogenetic testing on medication adherence.

Authors:  S B Haga; N M A LaPointe
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.550

2.  Assessment of patient perceptions of genomic testing to inform pharmacogenomic implementation.

Authors:  Yee Ming Lee; Ryan P McKillip; Brittany A Borden; Catherine E Klammer; Mark J Ratain; Peter H O'Donnell
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Pharmacogenomics and public health.

Authors:  D Veenstra; W Burke
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Current Status and Future Opportunities in Lung Precision Medicine Research with a Focus on Biomarkers. An American Thoracic Society/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Research Statement.

Authors:  Ann Chen Wu; James P Kiley; Patricia J Noel; Shashi Amur; Esteban G Burchard; John P Clancy; Joshua Galanter; Maki Inada; Tiffanie K Jones; Jonathan A Kropski; James E Loyd; Lawrence M Nogee; Benjamin A Raby; Angela J Rogers; David A Schwartz; Don D Sin; Avrum Spira; Scott T Weiss; Lisa R Young; Blanca E Himes
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Value of Genetic Testing for Hereditary Colorectal Cancer in a Probability-Based US Online Sample.

Authors:  Sara J Knight; Ateesha F Mohamed; Deborah A Marshall; Uri Ladabaum; Kathryn A Phillips; Judith M E Walsh
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Patient Perceptions of Care as Influenced by a Large Institutional Pharmacogenomic Implementation Program.

Authors:  R P McKillip; B A Borden; P Galecki; S A Ham; L Patrick-Miller; J P Hall; S Hussain; K Danahey; M Siegler; M J Sorrentino; Y Sacro; A M Davis; D T Rubin; K Lipstreuer; T S Polonsky; R Nanda; W R Harper; J L Koyner; D L Burnet; W M Stadler; M J Ratain; D O Meltzer; P H O'Donnell
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  "It's not like judgment day": public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information.

Authors:  Erynn S Gordon; Georgia Griffin; Lisa Wawak; Hauchie Pang; Sarah E Gollust; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Opinions, hopes and concerns regarding pharmacogenomics: a comparison of healthy individuals, heart failure patients and heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  K Lachance; S Korol; E O'Meara; A Ducharme; N Racine; M Liszkowski; J L Rouleau; G B Pelletier; M Carrier; M White; S de Denus
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.550

9.  Testing personalized medicine: patient and physician expectations of next-generation genomic sequencing in late-stage cancer care.

Authors:  Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; Jessica P Bytautas; Philippe L Bedard; Scott Ernst; Hal Hirte; Sebastien Hotte; Amit Oza; Albiruni Razak; Stephen Welch; Eric Winquist; Janet Dancey; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli Murphy-Bollinger; Joan Scott; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.