Literature DB >> 18813139

The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Initiative: methods of the EGAPP Working Group.

Steven M Teutsch1, Linda A Bradley, Glenn E Palomaki, James E Haddow, Margaret Piper, Ned Calonge, W David Dotson, Michael P Douglas, Alfred O Berg.   

Abstract

The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Initiative, established by the National Office of Public Health Genomics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, supports the development and implementation of a rigorous, evidence-based process for evaluating genetic tests and other genomic applications for clinical and public health practice in the United States. An independent, non-federal EGAPP Working Group (EWG), a multidisciplinary expert panel selects topics, oversees the systematic review of evidence, and makes recommendations based on that evidence. This article describes the EGAPP processes and details the specific methods and approaches used by the EWG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18813139      PMCID: PMC2743609          DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318184137c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  35 in total

1.  Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process.

Authors:  R P Harris; M Helfand; S H Woolf; K N Lohr; C D Mulrow; S M Teutsch; D Atkins
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services--methods. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services.

Authors:  P A Briss; S Zaza; M Pappaioanou; J Fielding; L Wright-De Agüero; B I Truman; D P Hopkins; P D Mullen; R S Thompson; S H Woolf; V G Carande-Kulis; L Anderson; A R Hinman; D V McQueen; S M Teutsch; J R Harris
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the Guide to Community Preventive Services. Task Force on Community Preventive Services.

Authors:  S Zaza; L K Wright-De Agüero; P A Briss; B I Truman; D P Hopkins; M H Hennessy; D M Sosin; L Anderson; V G Carande-Kulis; S M Teutsch; M Pappaioanou
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 4.  Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests.

Authors:  J J Deeks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-21

Review 5.  Genetic test evaluation: information needs of clinicians, policy makers, and the public.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; David Atkins; Marta Gwinn; Alan Guttmacher; James Haddow; Joseph Lau; Glenn Palomaki; Nancy Press; C Sue Richards; Louise Wideroff; Georgia L Wiesner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7.  Reporting, appraising, and integrating data on genotype prevalence and gene-disease associations.

Authors:  Julian Little; Linda Bradley; Molly S Bray; Mindy Clyne; Janice Dorman; Darrell L Ellsworth; James Hanson; Muin Khoury; Joseph Lau; Thomas R O'Brien; Nat Rothman; Donna Stroup; Emanuela Taioli; Duncan Thomas; Harri Vainio; Sholom Wacholder; Clarice Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Updated assessment of cystic fibrosis mutation frequencies in non-Hispanic Caucasians.

Authors:  Glenn E Palomaki; James E Haddow; Linda A Bradley; Stacey C FitzSimmons
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Laboratory standards and guidelines for population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening.

Authors:  W W Grody; G R Cutting; K W Klinger; C S Richards; M S Watson; R J Desnick
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Standards and guidelines for CFTR mutation testing.

Authors:  Carolyn Sue Richards; Linda A Bradley; Jean Amos; Bernice Allitto; Wayne W Grody; Anne Maddalena; Matthew J McGinnis; Thomas W Prior; Bradley W Popovich; Michael S Watson; Glenn E Palomaki
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  243 in total

Review 1.  Human Germline Genome Editing.

Authors:  Kelly E Ormond; Douglas P Mortlock; Derek T Scholes; Yvonne Bombard; Lawrence C Brody; W Andrew Faucett; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Laura Hercher; Rosario Isasi; Anna Middleton; Kiran Musunuru; Daniel Shriner; Alice Virani; Caroline E Young
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Improving validation practices in "omics" research.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Evolving research and stakeholder perspectives on pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Amber L Beitelshees; David L Veenstra
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  GT2RDF: Semantic Representation of Genetic Testing Data.

Authors:  Anamika Paul Rupa; Sweta Singh; Qian Zhu
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

5.  Some considerations about a report on 'Public health in an era of genomic-based and personalized medicine' from the Public Health Foundation, Cambridge.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Cassiman
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-02-19

Review 6.  The role of pharmacogenetics in nonmalignant gastrointestinal diseases.

Authors:  Michael Camilleri
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility.

Authors:  Christopher A Cassa; Sarah K Savage; Patrick L Taylor; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 8.  Cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  N Lynn Henry; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 6.603

9.  Points to consider in assessing and appraising predictive genetic tests.

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Jürgen John; Helena Kääriäinen; Alastair Kent; Ulf Kristofferson; Jörg Schmidtke
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2010-10-16

10.  Introducing genetic testing for cardiovascular disease in primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jo B Middlemass; Momina F Yazdani; Joe Kai; Penelope J Standen; Nadeem Qureshi
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.