Literature DB >> 28782725

The bio in the ink: cartilage regeneration with bioprintable hydrogels and articular cartilage-derived progenitor cells.

Riccardo Levato1, William R Webb2, Iris A Otto3, Anneloes Mensinga1, Yadan Zhang2, Mattie van Rijen1, René van Weeren4, Ilyas M Khan2, Jos Malda5.   

Abstract

Cell-laden hydrogels are the primary building blocks for bioprinting, and, also termed bioinks, are the foundations for creating structures that can potentially recapitulate the architecture of articular cartilage. To be functional, hydrogel constructs need to unlock the regenerative capacity of encapsulated cells. The recent identification of multipotent articular cartilage-resident chondroprogenitor cells (ACPCs), which share important traits with adult stem cells, represents a new opportunity for cartilage regeneration. However, little is known about the suitability of ACPCs for tissue engineering, especially in combination with biomaterials. This study aimed to investigate the potential of ACPCs in hydrogels for cartilage regeneration and biofabrication, and to evaluate their ability for zone-specific matrix production. Gelatin methacryloyl (gelMA)-based hydrogels were used to culture ACPCs, bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and chondrocytes, and as bioinks for printing. Our data shows ACPCs outperformed chondrocytes in terms of neo-cartilage production and unlike MSCs, ACPCs had the lowest gene expression levels of hypertrophy marker collagen type X, and the highest expression of PRG4, a key factor in joint lubrication. Co-cultures of the cell types in multi-compartment hydrogels allowed generating constructs with a layered distribution of collagens and glycosaminoglycans. By combining ACPC- and MSC-laden bioinks, a bioprinted model of articular cartilage was generated, consisting of defined superficial and deep regions, each with distinct cellular and extracellular matrix composition. Taken together, these results provide important information for the use of ACPC-laden hydrogels in regenerative medicine, and pave the way to the biofabrication of 3D constructs with multiple cell types for cartilage regeneration or in vitro tissue models. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Despite its limited ability to repair, articular cartilage harbors an endogenous population of progenitor cells (ACPCs), that to date, received limited attention in biomaterials and tissue engineering applications. Harnessing the potential of these cells in 3D hydrogels can open new avenues for biomaterial-based regenerative therapies, especially with advanced biofabrication technologies (e.g. bioprinting). This study highlights the potential of ACPCs to generate neo-cartilage in a gelatin-based hydrogel and bioink. The ACPC-laden hydrogel is a suitable substrate for chondrogenesis and data shows it has a bias in directing cells towards a superficial zone phenotype. For the first time, ACPC-hydrogels are evaluated both as alternative for and in combination with chondrocytes and MSCs, using co-cultures and bioprinting for cartilage regeneration in vitro. This study provides important cues on ACPCs, indicating they represent a promising cell source for the next generation of cartilage constructs with increased biomimicry.
Copyright © 2017 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofabrication; Cartilage regeneration; Chondroprogenitor cells; Co-culture; Hydrogel; Stem cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28782725      PMCID: PMC7116023          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  75 in total

Review 1.  Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field.

Authors:  Jürgen Groll; Thomas Boland; Torsten Blunk; Jason A Burdick; Dong-Woo Cho; Paul D Dalton; Brian Derby; Gabor Forgacs; Qing Li; Vladimir A Mironov; Lorenzo Moroni; Makoto Nakamura; Wenmiao Shu; Shoji Takeuchi; Giovanni Vozzi; Tim B F Woodfield; Tao Xu; James J Yoo; Jos Malda
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 9.954

2.  3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs.

Authors:  David B Kolesky; Ryan L Truby; A Sydney Gladman; Travis A Busbee; Kimberly A Homan; Jennifer A Lewis
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 30.849

3.  Evaluation of articular cartilage progenitor cells for the repair of articular defects in an equine model.

Authors:  David D Frisbie; Helen E McCarthy; Charles W Archer; Myra F Barrett; C Wayne McIlwraith
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The comparison of equine articular cartilage progenitor cells and bone marrow-derived stromal cells as potential cell sources for cartilage repair in the horse.

Authors:  Helen E McCarthy; Jennifer J Bara; Karen Brakspear; Sim K Singhrao; Charles W Archer
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 2.688

Review 5.  Potential benefits and limitations of utilizing chondroprogenitors in cell-based cartilage therapy.

Authors:  Chathuraka T Jayasuriya; Qian Chen
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.417

6.  In situ forming IPN hydrogels of calcium alginate and dextran-HEMA for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Laura Pescosolido; Tina Vermonden; Jos Malda; Roberta Censi; Wouter J A Dhert; Franco Alhaique; Wim E Hennink; Pietro Matricardi
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Comparative study of depth-dependent characteristics of equine and human osteochondral tissue from the medial and lateral femoral condyles.

Authors:  J Malda; K E M Benders; T J Klein; J C de Grauw; M J L Kik; D W Hutmacher; D B F Saris; P R van Weeren; W J A Dhert
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Immunophenotype and gene expression profiles of cell surface markers of mesenchymal stem cells derived from equine bone marrow and adipose tissue.

Authors:  Beatriz Ranera; Jaber Lyahyai; Antonio Romero; Francisco José Vázquez; Ana Rosa Remacha; María Luisa Bernal; Pilar Zaragoza; Clementina Rodellar; Inmaculada Martín-Burriel
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 2.046

9.  Identification and clonal characterisation of a progenitor cell sub-population in normal human articular cartilage.

Authors:  Rebecca Williams; Ilyas M Khan; Kirsty Richardson; Larissa Nelson; Helen E McCarthy; Talal Analbelsi; Sim K Singhrao; Gary P Dowthwaite; Rhiannon E Jones; Duncan M Baird; Holly Lewis; Selwyn Roberts; Hannah M Shaw; Jayesh Dudhia; John Fairclough; Timothy Briggs; Charles W Archer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Should we use cells, biomaterials, or tissue engineering for cartilage regeneration?

Authors:  Jonathan C Bernhard; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 6.832

View more
  56 in total

1.  Bi-layered micro-fibre reinforced hydrogels for articular cartilage regeneration.

Authors:  Miguel Castilho; Vivian Mouser; Mike Chen; Jos Malda; Keita Ito
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  The applicability of furfuryl-gelatin as a novel bioink for tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Shweta AnilKumar; Shane C Allen; Nishat Tasnim; Tahmina Akter; Shinhye Park; Alok Kumar; Munmun Chattopadhyay; Yoshihiro Ito; Laura J Suggs; Binata Joddar
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 3.  Opportunities and challenges of translational 3D bioprinting.

Authors:  Sean V Murphy; Paolo De Coppi; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 25.671

Review 4.  New Frontiers for Biofabrication and Bioreactor Design in Microphysiological System Development.

Authors:  Jonathon Parrish; Khoon Lim; Boyang Zhang; Milica Radisic; Tim B F Woodfield
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 5.  From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting.

Authors:  Riccardo Levato; Tomasz Jungst; Ruben G Scheuring; Torsten Blunk; Juergen Groll; Jos Malda
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 30.849

6.  Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3D bioprinting.

Authors:  A Ribeiro; M M Blokzijl; R Levato; C W Visser; M Castilho; W E Hennink; T Vermonden; J Malda
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 9.954

7.  Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Articular Cartilage: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yang Wu; Patrick Kennedy; Nicholas Bonazza; Yin Yu; Aman Dhawan; Ibrahim Ozbolat
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 8.  3D printing- creating a blueprint for the future of orthopedics: Current concept review and the road ahead!

Authors:  Vaibhav Bagaria; Rakesh Bhansali; Prashant Pawar
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-07-23

Review 9.  Crosstalk Between Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Chondrocytes: The Hidden Therapeutic Potential for Cartilage Regeneration.

Authors:  Teresa Z Brose; Eva J Kubosch; Hagen Schmal; Martin J Stoddart; Angela R Armiento
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.739

10.  Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress.

Authors:  Sara Cristina Pedroza-González; Marisela Rodriguez-Salvador; Baruc Emet Pérez-Benítez; Mario Moisés Alvarez; Grissel Trujillo-de Santiago
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2021-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.