Literature DB >> 28976364

Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3D bioprinting.

A Ribeiro1, M M Blokzijl, R Levato, C W Visser, M Castilho, W E Hennink, T Vermonden, J Malda.   

Abstract

During extrusion-based bioprinting, the deposited bioink filaments are subjected to deformations, such as collapse of overhanging filaments, which compromises the ability to stack several layers of bioink, and fusion between adjacent filaments, which compromises the resolution and maintenance of a desired pore structure. When developing new bioinks, approaches to assess their shape fidelity after printing would be beneficial to evaluate the degree of deformation of the deposited filament and to estimate how similar the final printed construct would be to the design. However, shape fidelity has been prevalently assessed qualitatively through visual inspection after printing, hampering the direct comparison of the printability of different bioinks. In this technical note, we propose a quantitative evaluation for shape fidelity of bioinks based on testing the filament collapse on overhanging structures and the filament fusion of parallel printed strands. Both tests were applied on a hydrogel platform based on poloxamer 407 and poly(ethylene glycol) blends, providing a library of hydrogels with different yield stresses. The presented approach is an easy way to assess bioink shape fidelity, applicable to any filament-based bioprinting system and able to quantitatively evaluate this aspect of printability, based on the degree of deformation of the printed filament. In addition, we built a simple theoretical model that relates filament collapse with bioink yield stress. The results of both shape fidelity tests underline the role of yield stress as one of the parameters influencing the printability of a bioink. The presented quantitative evaluation will allow for reproducible comparisons between different bioink platforms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28976364      PMCID: PMC7116103          DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa90e2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  30 in total

Review 1.  Biofabrication: a 21st century manufacturing paradigm.

Authors:  V Mironov; T Trusk; V Kasyanov; S Little; R Swaja; R Markwald
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 9.954

2.  Nanostructured Pluronic hydrogels as bioinks for 3D bioprinting.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Jana Becher; Matthias Schnabelrauch; Marcy Zenobi-Wong
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 3.  Strategies and Molecular Design Criteria for 3D Printable Hydrogels.

Authors:  Tomasz Jungst; Willi Smolan; Kristin Schacht; Thomas Scheibel; Jürgen Groll
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 4.  Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field.

Authors:  Jürgen Groll; Thomas Boland; Torsten Blunk; Jason A Burdick; Dong-Woo Cho; Paul D Dalton; Brian Derby; Gabor Forgacs; Qing Li; Vladimir A Mironov; Lorenzo Moroni; Makoto Nakamura; Wenmiao Shu; Shoji Takeuchi; Giovanni Vozzi; Tim B F Woodfield; Tao Xu; James J Yoo; Jos Malda
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 9.954

5.  A New Approach for Fabricating Collagen/ECM-Based Bioinks Using Preosteoblasts and Human Adipose Stem Cells.

Authors:  Hyeong Jin Lee; Yong Bok Kim; Seung Hyun Ahn; Ji-Seon Lee; Chul Ho Jang; Hyeon Yoon; Wook Chun; Geun Hyung Kim
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 9.933

6.  Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues.

Authors:  David B Kolesky; Kimberly A Homan; Mark A Skylar-Scott; Jennifer A Lewis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The bio in the ink: cartilage regeneration with bioprintable hydrogels and articular cartilage-derived progenitor cells.

Authors:  Riccardo Levato; William R Webb; Iris A Otto; Anneloes Mensinga; Yadan Zhang; Mattie van Rijen; René van Weeren; Ilyas M Khan; Jos Malda
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Quantitative optimization of solid freeform deposition of aqueous hydrogels.

Authors:  K H Kang; L A Hockaday; J T Butcher
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 9.954

9.  Research on the printability of hydrogels in 3D bioprinting.

Authors:  Yong He; FeiFei Yang; HaiMing Zhao; Qing Gao; Bing Xia; JianZhong Fu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Yield stress determines bioprintability of hydrogels based on gelatin-methacryloyl and gellan gum for cartilage bioprinting.

Authors:  Vivian H M Mouser; Ferry P W Melchels; Jetze Visser; Wouter J A Dhert; Debby Gawlitta; Jos Malda
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 9.954

View more
  48 in total

1.  Optimization of gelatin-alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach.

Authors:  Teng Gao; Gregory J Gillispie; Joshua S Copus; Anil Kumar Pr; Young-Joon Seol; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 2.  Biofabrication for osteochondral tissue regeneration: bioink printability requirements.

Authors:  Saba Abdulghani; Pedro G Morouço
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Flow Behavior Prior to Crosslinking: The Need for Precursor Rheology for Placement of Hydrogels in Medical Applications and for 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Jakob M Townsend; Emily C Beck; Stevin H Gehrke; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 29.190

4.  Bioprinting 101: Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of Cell-Laden 3D Bioprinted Scaffolds.

Authors:  Kaivalya A Deo; Kanwar Abhay Singh; Charles W Peak; Daniel L Alge; Akhilesh K Gaharwar
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Process-Structure-Quality Relationships of Three-Dimensional Printed Poly(Caprolactone)-Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds.

Authors:  Sam Gerdes; Azadeh Mostafavi; Srikanthan Ramesh; Adnan Memic; Iris V Rivero; Prahalada Rao; Ali Tamayol
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Physical and Chemical Factors Influencing the Printability of Hydrogel-based Extrusion Bioinks.

Authors:  Sang Cheon Lee; Gregory Gillispie; Peter Prim; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 7.  3D bioprinting of functional tissue models for personalized drug screening and in vitro disease modeling.

Authors:  Xuanyi Ma; Justin Liu; Wei Zhu; Min Tang; Natalie Lawrence; Claire Yu; Maling Gou; Shaochen Chen
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 8.  Biomechanical factors in three-dimensional tissue bioprinting.

Authors:  Liqun Ning; Carmen J Gil; Boeun Hwang; Andrea S Theus; Lilanni Perez; Martin L Tomov; Holly Bauser-Heaton; Vahid Serpooshan
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 19.162

9.  Void-free 3D Bioprinting for In-situ Endothelialization and Microfluidic Perfusion.

Authors:  Liliang Ouyang; James P K Armstrong; Qu Chen; Yiyang Lin; Molly M Stevens
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 18.808

Review 10.  Emulating Human Tissues and Organs: A Bioprinting Perspective Toward Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Ana Clotilde Fonseca; Ferry P W Melchels; Miguel J S Ferreira; Samuel R Moxon; Geoffrey Potjewyd; Tim R Dargaville; Susan J Kimber; Marco Domingos
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.