Literature DB >> 32045053

From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting.

Riccardo Levato1,2, Tomasz Jungst3, Ruben G Scheuring3, Torsten Blunk4, Juergen Groll3, Jos Malda1,2.   

Abstract

In 2013, the "biofabrication window" was introduced to reflect the processing challenge for the fields of biofabrication and bioprinting. At that time, the lack of printable materials that could serve as cell-laden bioinks, as well as the limitations of printing and assembly methods, presented a major constraint. However, recent developments have now resulted in the availability of a plethora of bioinks, new printing approaches, and the technological advancement of established techniques. Nevertheless, it remains largely unknown which materials and technical parameters are essential for the fabrication of intrinsically hierarchical cell-material constructs that truly mimic biologically functional tissue. In order to achieve this, it is urged that the field now shift its focus from materials and technologies toward the biological development of the resulting constructs. Therefore, herein, the recent material and technological advances since the introduction of the biofabrication window are briefly summarized, i.e., approaches how to generate shape, to then focus the discussion on how to acquire the biological function within this context. In particular, a vision of how biological function can evolve from the possibility to determine shape is outlined.
© 2020 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biofabrication; bioinks; biological function; regenerative medicine; tissue hierarchy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32045053      PMCID: PMC7116209          DOI: 10.1002/adma.201906423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Mater        ISSN: 0935-9648            Impact factor:   30.849


  188 in total

1.  Fabrication and characterization of gels with integrated channels using 3D printing with microfluidic nozzle for tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  R Attalla; C Ling; P Selvaganapathy
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.838

Review 2.  Physical chemistry of supramolecular polymer networks.

Authors:  Sebastian Seiffert; Joris Sprakel
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  A versatile bioink for three-dimensional printing of cellular scaffolds based on thermally and photo-triggered tandem gelation.

Authors:  Matti Kesti; Michael Müller; Jana Becher; Matthias Schnabelrauch; Matteo D'Este; David Eglin; Marcy Zenobi-Wong
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Direct 3D Printing of Shear-Thinning Hydrogels into Self-Healing Hydrogels.

Authors:  Christopher B Highley; Christopher B Rodell; Jason A Burdick
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 30.849

5.  Thiol-Ene Clickable Gelatin: A Platform Bioink for Multiple 3D Biofabrication Technologies.

Authors:  Sarah Bertlein; Gabriella Brown; Khoon S Lim; Tomasz Jungst; Thomas Boeck; Torsten Blunk; Joerg Tessmar; Gary J Hooper; Tim B F Woodfield; Juergen Groll
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 30.849

6.  Hierarchical Fabrication of Engineered Vascularized Bone Biphasic Constructs via Dual 3D Bioprinting: Integrating Regional Bioactive Factors into Architectural Design.

Authors:  Haitao Cui; Wei Zhu; Margaret Nowicki; Xuan Zhou; Ali Khademhosseini; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 7.  Rising to the challenge: applying biofabrication approaches for better drug and chemical product development.

Authors:  Anthony M Holmes; Alex Charlton; Brian Derby; Lorna Ewart; Andrew Scott; Wenmiao Shu
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 9.954

8.  Biofunctionalized aligned microgels provide 3D cell guidance to mimic complex tissue matrices.

Authors:  Jonas C Rose; David B Gehlen; Tamás Haraszti; Jens Köhler; Christopher J Licht; Laura De Laporte
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Biofabrication of spatially organised tissues by directing the growth of cellular spheroids within 3D printed polymeric microchambers.

Authors:  Andrew C Daly; Daniel J Kelly
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  3D bioprinting of methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) hydrogel with intrinsic osteogenicity.

Authors:  Michelle T Poldervaart; Birgit Goversen; Mylene de Ruijter; Anna Abbadessa; Ferry P W Melchels; F Cumhur Öner; Wouter J A Dhert; Tina Vermonden; Jacqueline Alblas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  46 in total

1.  Extracellular Matrix/Amorphous Magnesium Phosphate Bioink for 3D Bioprinting of Craniomaxillofacial Bone Tissue.

Authors:  Nileshkumar Dubey; Jessica A Ferreira; Jos Malda; Sarit B Bhaduri; Marco C Bottino
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 9.229

2.  Fabrication of MSC-laden composites of hyaluronic acid hydrogels reinforced with MEW scaffolds for cartilage repair.

Authors:  Jonathan H Galarraga; Ryan C Locke; Claire E Witherel; Brendan D Stoeckl; Miguel Castilho; Robert L Mauck; Jos Malda; Riccardo Levato; Jason A Burdick
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 3.  3D Bioprinting of Cell-Laden Hydrogels for Improved Biological Functionality.

Authors:  Sarah M Hull; Lucia G Brunel; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 30.849

4.  Molecularly cleavable bioinks facilitate high-performance digital light processing-based bioprinting of functional volumetric soft tissues.

Authors:  Mian Wang; Wanlu Li; Jin Hao; Arthur Gonzales; Zhibo Zhao; Regina Sanchez Flores; Xiao Kuang; Xuan Mu; Terry Ching; Guosheng Tang; Zeyu Luo; Carlos Ezio Garciamendez-Mijares; Jugal Kishore Sahoo; Michael F Wells; Gengle Niu; Prajwal Agrawal; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Kevin Eggan; Yu Shrike Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 5.  Perspectives for 3D-Bioprinting in Modeling of Tumor Immune Evasion.

Authors:  Rafał Staros; Agata Michalak; Kinga Rusinek; Krzysztof Mucha; Zygmunt Pojda; Radosław Zagożdżon
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Recent Advances in 3D Printing with Protein-Based Inks.

Authors:  Xuan Mu; Francesca Agostinacchio; Ning Xiang; Ying Pei; Yousef Khan; Chengchen Guo; Peggy Cebe; Antonella Motta; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 29.190

Review 7.  Biomechanical factors in three-dimensional tissue bioprinting.

Authors:  Liqun Ning; Carmen J Gil; Boeun Hwang; Andrea S Theus; Lilanni Perez; Martin L Tomov; Holly Bauser-Heaton; Vahid Serpooshan
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 19.162

Review 8.  3D Tissue and Organ Printing-Hope and Reality.

Authors:  Assaf Shapira; Tal Dvir
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 16.806

9.  Differential Responses to Bioink-Induced Oxidative Stress in Endothelial Cells and Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Hatice Genç; Jonas Hazur; Emine Karakaya; Barbara Dietel; Faina Bider; Jürgen Groll; Christoph Alexiou; Aldo R Boccaccini; Rainer Detsch; Iwona Cicha
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  3D Printing of Microgel Scaffolds with Tunable Void Fraction to Promote Cell Infiltration.

Authors:  Alexis J Seymour; Sungchul Shin; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 11.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.