Literature DB >> 28775443

USE OF ANORECTAL MANOMETRY FOR OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF ANORECTAL FUNCTION AFTER POUCH ILEOANAL ANASTOMOSIS.

Rajan Chaudhry1.   

Abstract

Sixteen patients of ulcerative colitis and two of familial adenomatous polyposis were subjected to anorectal manometry, a minimal of three months after Pouch Ileo-Anal Anastomosis and closure of ileostomy. Using a perfusion catheter the parameters measured were resting anal pressure (RAP), maximum squeeze pressure (MSP), pouch volume and compliance at maximum tolerated volume. Subjective evaluation included anal continence and frequency of stools. The subjective functional results after surgery were then correlated with the objective findings of manometry. 4/18 patients (22%) had nocturnal incontinence only, while one patient (5%) had incontinence both by day and night. Frequency of stools was < 8/day in 10/18 patients (55%). Only 1/5 patients (20%) with incontinence had anal sphincter pressures greater than the controls while only 3/13 continent patients (22%) had anal sphincter pressures less than the controls. The study shows that low anal sphincter pressures are associated with post-operative incontinence and that there is a correlation between decreased frequency of stools and increased pouch volume as well as pouch compliance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anal sphincter pressures; Pouch compliance; Pouch ileoanal anastomosis; Pouch volume; Ulcerative colitis

Year:  2017        PMID: 28775443      PMCID: PMC5531326          DOI: 10.1016/S0377-1237(17)30499-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  11 in total

1.  THE FUNCTIONAL IMPORTANCE OF THE INTERNAL ANAL SPHINCTER.

Authors:  R C BENNETT; H L DUTHIE
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Pouch size: the important functional determinant after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  T Oresland; S Fasth; S Nordgren; S Akervall; L Hultén
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Anal canal pressure and motility after ileoanal anastomosis.

Authors:  P R O'Connell; S J Stryker; A M Metcalf; J H Pemberton; K A Kelly
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1988-01

4.  S-pouches vs. J-pouches. A comparison of functional outcomes.

Authors:  S M McHugh; N E Diamant; R McLeod; Z Cohen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Mechanisms of rectal continence. Lessons from the ileoanal procedure.

Authors:  R W Beart; R R Dozois; B G Wolff; J H Pemberton
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Stapled vs hand-sutured ileoanal anastomosis in restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  P Luukkonen; H Järvinen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-04

7.  Physiologic aspects of continence after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileo-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  J Heppell; K A Kelly; S F Phillips; R W Beart; R L Telander; J Perrault
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Anal manometry with microtransducer technique before and after restorative proctocolectomy. Sphincter function and clinical correlations.

Authors:  K Lindquist
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Anorectal function after restorative proctocolectomy and low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis.

Authors:  W M Sun; N W Read; P Katsinelos; T C Donnelly; A J Shorthouse
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Physiological parameters influencing function in restorative proctocolectomy and ileo-pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  M R Keighley; K Yoshioka; W Kmiot; F Heyen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.