Literature DB >> 8156360

Anorectal function after restorative proctocolectomy and low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis.

W M Sun1, N W Read, P Katsinelos, T C Donnelly, A J Shorthouse.   

Abstract

Anorectal manometry and electromyography were studied in 17 patients before and after restorative proctocolectomy with stapled pouch-anal anastomosis, in ten patients before and after low anterior resection with stapled coloanal anastomosis, and in 35 normal controls. More than 80 per cent of patients in both groups developed abnormal oscillation of anal pressure after operation (amplitude 15-60 (median 25) cmH2O, frequency 4-10 (median 8) per min) and showed no anal relaxation in response to intermittent neorectal distension. All patients lost discriminative rectal sensation and none could perceive a normal desire to defaecate. Patients with postoperative soiling had a greater amplitude of anal pressure oscillation and lower minimum basal pressure, although those who underwent coloanal anastomosis had a greater risk of incontinence because of large asynchronous oscillations in neorectal pressure. The common pathophysiological features after restorative proctocolectomy and coloanal anastomosis probably relate to damage to the autonomic and enteric nerve supplies. The presence of an unstable internal anal sphincter may be an important cause of postoperative nocturnal incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8156360     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800810244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  6 in total

1.  USE OF ANORECTAL MANOMETRY FOR OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF ANORECTAL FUNCTION AFTER POUCH ILEOANAL ANASTOMOSIS.

Authors:  Rajan Chaudhry
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-26

Review 2.  Pouch operation for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-ichi Hida; Kiyotaka Okuno
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Anterior resection following posterior transsacral stapling and transection of the anal canal for low-lying rectal cancer in males.

Authors:  J Hida; M Yasutomi; T Maruyama; T Wakano; T Uchida; K Fujimoto; R Kubo; H Inufusa; H Umemura; K Shindo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Preservation of complete anal sphincteric proprioception in restorative proctocolectomy: the inhibitory reflex and fine control of continence need not be impaired.

Authors:  W G Lewis; M E Williamson; A S Miller; P M Sagar; P J Holdsworth; D Johnston
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Surgical treatment of lower rectal cancer with sphincter preservation using handsewn coloanal anastomosis.

Authors:  Y Nagamatsu; K Shirouzu; H Isomoto; Y Ogata; I Tsuchida; Y Akagi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Mesorectal fat area as a useful predictor of the difficulty of robotic-assisted laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Yusuke Yamaoka; Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Yusuke Kinugasa; Akio Shiomi; Hiroyasu Kagawa; Yushi Yamakawa; Akinobu Furutani; Shoichi Manabe; Kakeru Torii; Kohei Koido; Keita Mori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.