Literature DB >> 3219549

Physiological parameters influencing function in restorative proctocolectomy and ileo-pouch-anal anastomosis.

M R Keighley1, K Yoshioka, W Kmiot, F Heyen.   

Abstract

Ileo-pouch-anal function has been assessed in 30 patients after restorative proctocolectomy and compared with age- and sex-matched controls. Median resting anal canal pressure was only 42 cmH2O (7-113 cmH2O) compared with 100 cmH2O (46-114 cmH2O) in controls (P less than 0.005). Maximum squeeze anal pressures were also significantly lower in pouch patients: 87 cmH2O (25-180 cmH2O) than controls: 143 cmH2O (114-171 cmH2O) (P less than 0.01). The recto-anal inhibitory reflex was absent in all pouch patients but was present in all controls. Maximum pouch or ileal pressures exceeded resting anal canal pressures in three patients. Median volume at first leak during saline infusion was 320 ml (60 ml-no leak) in pouch patients whereas the majority of controls had no leakage (median, none; 450 ml-no leak; P less than 0.05). Threshold pouch sensation (median, 50 ml (0-250 ml] did not differ from rectal sensation in controls (50 ml (0-180 ml] but pouches were less compliant than a normal rectum, median 6.8 ml/cmH2O (2.1-17 ml/cmH2O) and 11.6 ml/cmH2O (4.7-16.2 ml/cmH2O) respectively (P less than 0.05). In patients who had an episode of pelvic sepsis (n = 8) the average number of abnormal physiological indices per patient was 3.8, compared with 1.3 in those with no sepsis (P less than 0.05). There was no difference in the number of abnormalities per patient with a J pouch (2.0; n = 19) or a W pouch (1.9; n = 11).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3219549     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800751017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  9 in total

1.  Key factors influencing bowel function after ileal W-pouch anal anastomosis: a spectral analysis of W-pouch motor activity.

Authors:  T Maruta; S Homma; M Yagi; J Hasegawa; K Shimamura; T Suda; Y Sakai; K Hatakeyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  USE OF ANORECTAL MANOMETRY FOR OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF ANORECTAL FUNCTION AFTER POUCH ILEOANAL ANASTOMOSIS.

Authors:  Rajan Chaudhry
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-26

Review 3.  Determinants of ileoanal pouch function.

Authors:  M D Levitt; A A Lewis
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Manovolumetric characteristics and functional results in three different pelvic pouch designs.

Authors:  T Hallgren; S Fasth; S Nordgren; T Oresland; L Hallsberg; L Hultén
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Is age relevant to functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis?: prospective assessment of 122 cases.

Authors:  Y Takao; R Gilliland; J J Nogueras; E G Weiss; S D Wexner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Evaluation of ileal W pouch-anal anastomosis for restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  K Hatakeyama; K Yamai; T Muto
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The role of pouch compliance measurement in the management of pouch dysfunction.

Authors:  Yasuko Maeda; María Elena Molina; Christine Norton; Simon D McLaughlin; Carolynne J Vaizey; Søren Laurberg; Susan K Clark
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Factors affecting anal continence after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  M Pescatori; C Mattana
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Defecation mechanisms after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch--anal anastomosis in dogs.

Authors:  S Willis; F Hölzl; B Wein; V von Felbert; V Fackeldey; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 2.571

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.