Literature DB >> 3966638

Mechanisms of rectal continence. Lessons from the ileoanal procedure.

R W Beart, R R Dozois, B G Wolff, J H Pemberton.   

Abstract

To clarify mechanisms of rectal continence, we evaluated 34 patients who had straight or J-pouch ileoanal anastomosis. This evaluation included pressures, anal inhibitory reflex, neorectal capacity, neorectal compliance, and the ability to discriminate stool from gas. Both groups of patients had satisfactory anal sphincter resting pressures and neorectal capacities, and all could discriminate stool from gas despite the absence of any rectal mucosa. We conclude that normal rectal mucosa is not necessary to be able to discriminate stool from gas; a long rectal muscular cuff is not necessary for rectal sensation; essentially normal sphincter function is preserved, and this procedure does not normally fail because of inadequate sphincter function or the absence of the anal inhibitory reflex; and in the presence of normal sphincter function, continence is not dependent on the presence of normal mucosa or the anal inhibitory reflex but correlates with reservoir capacity and compliance as well as with the frequency and strength of intrinsic bowel contractions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3966638     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(85)80005-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  10 in total

1.  USE OF ANORECTAL MANOMETRY FOR OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF ANORECTAL FUNCTION AFTER POUCH ILEOANAL ANASTOMOSIS.

Authors:  Rajan Chaudhry
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-26

2.  Previous abdominal colectomy affects functional results after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  M E Zenilman; N J Soper; D Dunnegan; J M Becker
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Impact of anal manipulation and pouch design on ileal pouch function.

Authors:  W B Tuckson; M J McNamara; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J R Oakley
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 4.  Determinants of ileoanal pouch function.

Authors:  M D Levitt; A A Lewis
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Manometric follow-up of anal sphincter function after an ileo-anal pouch procedure.

Authors:  P Luukkonen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Scintigraphic assessment of the anorectal angle in health and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  D C Barkel; J H Pemberton; M E Pezim; S F Phillips; K A Kelly; M L Brown
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Preservation of complete anal sphincteric proprioception in restorative proctocolectomy: the inhibitory reflex and fine control of continence need not be impaired.

Authors:  W G Lewis; M E Williamson; A S Miller; P M Sagar; P J Holdsworth; D Johnston
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa.

Authors:  W T Reilly; J H Pemberton; B G Wolff; S Nivatvongs; R M Devine; W J Litchy; P B McIntyre
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Postoperative intra-abdominal and pelvic sepsis complicating ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  N A Scott; R R Dozois; R W Beart; J H Pemberton; B G Wolff; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Coloanal anastomosis in the management of benign and malignant rectal disease.

Authors:  D B Drake; J H Pemberton; R W Beart; R R Dozois; B G Wolff
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 12.969

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.