Literature DB >> 3622174

S-pouches vs. J-pouches. A comparison of functional outcomes.

S M McHugh, N E Diamant, R McLeod, Z Cohen.   

Abstract

Subjects undergoing proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis of either a J-shaped or an S-shaped ileal reservoir were studied with respect to functional status. Both subjective and objective measures were used. The S-pouch subjects appeared to have better early functional results, but no differences were found between groups evaluated at least one year from ileostomy closure. While virtually all subjects preferred restorative proctocolectomy to their previous loop ileostomy, there was a relatively high frequency of bowel-related symptoms, worries about bowel activity, and associated behavioral changes. The actual significance of these symptoms is difficult to determine at present. Further assessment of the quality of life in individuals with restorative proctocolectomy in comparison with subjects undergoing alternative surgical treatments is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3622174     DOI: 10.1007/bf02561686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  15 in total

1.  USE OF ANORECTAL MANOMETRY FOR OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF ANORECTAL FUNCTION AFTER POUCH ILEOANAL ANASTOMOSIS.

Authors:  Rajan Chaudhry
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-26

2.  Impact of anal manipulation and pouch design on ileal pouch function.

Authors:  W B Tuckson; M J McNamara; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J R Oakley
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 3.  Determinants of ileoanal pouch function.

Authors:  M D Levitt; A A Lewis
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  The use of an ileostomy connector to diminish the frequency of defecation prior to ileostomy closure in patients with a pelvic pouch.

Authors:  K Maeda; M Hashimoto; J Koh; O Yamamoto; Y Hosoda; Y Morikawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Comparison of the functional results of ileorectostomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis following total colectomy.

Authors:  A Nagy
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Is age relevant to functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis?: prospective assessment of 122 cases.

Authors:  Y Takao; R Gilliland; J J Nogueras; E G Weiss; S D Wexner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Proctocolectomy and ileoanal anastomosis with J-shaped or S-shaped ileal pouch.

Authors:  Z Cohen; R S McLeod
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Surgery for ulcerative colitis in 1,000 patients.

Authors:  Hiroki Ikeuchi; Motoi Uchino; Hiroki Matsuoka; Toshihiro Bando; Takayuki Matsumoto; Naohiro Tomita; Yasutugu Syoji; Masato Kusunoki; Takehira Yamamura; Joji Utsunomiya
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective study in 100 patients.

Authors:  T Oresland; S Fasth; S Nordgren; L Hultén
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Quality of life in the late follow-up of ulcerative colitis patients submitted to restorative proctocolectomy with sphincter preservation over ten years ago.

Authors:  Alberto Luiz Monteiro Meyer; Magaly Gêmeo Teixeira; Maristela Gomes de Almeida; Desidério Roberto Kiss; Sergio Carlos Nahas; Ivan Cecconello
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.