| Literature DB >> 28773212 |
Purabi R Ghosh1, Derek Fawcett2, Shashi B Sharma3, Gerrard E J Poinern4.
Abstract
The quantities of organic waste produced globally by aquacultural and horticulture are extremely large and offer an attractive renewable source of biomolecules and bioactive compounds. The availability of such large and diverse sources of waste materials creates a unique opportunity to develop new recycling and food waste utilisation strategies. The aim of this review is to report the current status of research in the emerging field of producing high-value nanoparticles from food waste. Eco-friendly biogenic processes are quite rapid, and are usually carried out at normal room temperature and pressure. These alternative clean technologies do not rely on the use of the toxic chemicals and solvents commonly associated with traditional nanoparticle manufacturing processes. The relatively small number of research articles in the field have been surveyed and evaluated. Among the diversity of waste types, promising candidates and their ability to produce various high-value nanoparticles are discussed. Experimental parameters, nanoparticle characteristics and potential applications for nanoparticles in pharmaceuticals and biomedical applications are discussed. In spite of the advantages, there are a number of challenges, including nanoparticle reproducibility and understanding the formation mechanisms between different food waste products. Thus, there is considerable scope and opportunity for further research in this emerging field.Entities:
Keywords: adding value; biogenic synthesis; green chemistry; nanoparticles; recycling
Year: 2017 PMID: 28773212 PMCID: PMC5578218 DOI: 10.3390/ma10080852
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1A summary of major sources of food waste from producer to household consumer [12,13,14].
Figure 2Schematic representation of the biogenic synthesis of nanoparticles using aquacultural and horticultural food waste extracts.
Figure 3Schematic diagram of the mechanism behind the biogenic synthesis of metallic nanoparticles.
A selection of nanoparticles biosynthesised by horticultural waste sources.
| Nanoparticle | Size & Morphology | Food Source | Year | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag | 5 to 35 nm, Spherical | 2012 | [ | |
| Ag & Au | Ag: 16 nm, Spherical, | 2010 | [ | |
| Ag | 3 to 12 nm, Spherical | 2011 | [ | |
| Ag | 35 ± 2 nm @ 25 °C, Spherical | 2011 | [ | |
| Ag | 5 to 20 nm, Spherical | 2013 | [ | |
| Ag | 10 nm, Quasi-spherical | 2010 | [ | |
| Ag & Au | Ag: 10 nm to 20 nm, Spherical | 2005 | [ | |
| Ag | Large nanoclusters | 2010 | [ | |
| Ag | 60 to 80 nm, Spherical | 2008 | [ | |
| Ag | 15 nm, Cubic | 2009 | [ | |
| Ag | 0.1 µm to 0.5 µm, Granular | 2014 | [ | |
| Ag | 4.32 nm to 17.65 nm, Spherical | 2014 | [ | |
| Ag | 4 nm to 22 nm, Spherical | 2011 | [ | |
| Ag | 17.96 ± 0.16 nm, Spherical | 2017 | [ | |
| Au | 20 to 140 nm, Spherical | 2015 | [ | |
| Au | 20 to 25 nm, Quasi-spherical | Grape skin, stalk and seed waste | 2014 | [ |
| Au | 50 to 100 nm, Spherical | Rice bran (aw) | 2014 | [ |
| Au | 200 to 500 nm, Triangular, hexagonal | 2010 | [ | |
| Au | 6.03 ± 2.77 to 18.01 ± 3.67 nm, Spherical | 2014 | [ | |
| Au | 432.3 nm, Shape not specified | 2014 | [ | |
| Au | Micro-scale, Triangular | 2006 | [ | |
| Au | pH 9: 10 nm, Spherical, pH 10: 25 nm, Spherical, rods, | 2011 | [ | |
| Pd | 50 nm, Crystalline, irregular shape | 2010 | [ | |
| Pd & Ag | 20 nm to 60 nm, Spherical | Various commercially available tea/coffee extracts | 2008 | [ |
| Pd & Pt | 16 to 20 nm, Spherical | Lignin (aw) | 2012 | [ |
| Pd | 96 nm, Spherical | 2015 | [ | |
| Fe3O4 | 5 to 25 nm, Cubes & Pyramids | Tea Waste | 2014 | [ |
| MgO | 29 nm, Spherical | 2015 | [ | |
| Mn3O4 | 20 nm to 50 nm, Spherical | 2014 | [ |
Note: (aw) indicates agricultural waste.
A selection of nanoparticles biosynthesised using marine plant sources.
| Nanoparticle | Size & Shape | Marine Alga | Year | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag | 3 to 44 nm, Spherical and Cubic |
| 2013 | [ |
| Ag | 30 nm, Spherical |
| 2013 | [ |
| Ag | 4 to 24 nm, Spherical |
| 2017 | [ |
| Ag | 20 nm, Spherical |
| 2016 | [ |
| Au | 6 to 10 nm, Spherical & Triangular |
| 2013 | [ |
| Au | 18.7 to 93.7 nm, Spherical |
| 2012 | [ |
| Pd | 4 to 6 nm, Spherical |
| 2015 | [ |
| Cu2O, CuO | 5 to 45 nm, Spherical |
| 2014 | [ |
| Cu/Cu2O | 53 nm, Spherical |
| 2014 | [ |
| Fe3O4 | 18 ± 4 nm, Cubic |
| 2013 | [ |
| ZnO | 18 to 50 nm, Hexagonal |
| 2014 | [ |