Literature DB >> 28766185

When your mind skips what your eyes fixate: How forced fixations lead to comprehension illusions in reading.

Elizabeth R Schotter1, Mallorie Leinenger2, Titus von der Malsburg3.   

Abstract

The phenomenon of forced fixations suggests that readers sometimes fixate a word (due to oculomotor constraints) even though they intended to skip it (due to parafoveal cognitive-linguistic processing). We investigate whether this leads readers to look directly at a word but not pay attention to it. We used a gaze-contingent boundary paradigm to dissociate parafoveal and foveal information (e.g., the word phone changed to scarf once the reader's eyes moved to it) and asked questions about the sentence to determine which one the reader encoded. When the word was skipped or fixated only briefly (i.e., up to 100 ms) readers were more likely to report reading the parafoveal than the fixated word, suggesting that there are cases in which readers look directly at a word but their minds ignore it, leading to the illusion of reading something they did not fixate.

Keywords:  Eye movements and reading; Text comprehension; Word recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28766185     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1356-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

Review 1.  Parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Bernhard Angele; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  A further look at postview effects in reading: An eye-movements study of influences from the left of fixation.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Victoria A McGowan; Stoyan Kurtev; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Is semantic preview benefit due to relatedness or plausibility?

Authors:  Aaron Veldre; Sally Andrews
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.

Authors:  Keith Rayner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Word misperception, the neighbor frequency effect, and the role of sentence context: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Timothy J Slattery
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Eye movements and display change detection during reading.

Authors:  Timothy J Slattery; Bernhard Angele; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.

Authors:  E D Reichle; A Pollatsek; D L Fisher; K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: evidence for parallel programming of saccades.

Authors:  R E Morrison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  4 in total

1.  Failure to detect function word repetitions and omissions in reading: Are eye movements to blame?

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Sophia Dodge; Andrew L Cohen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

2.  Readers can identify the meanings of words without looking at them: Evidence from regressive eye movements.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Anna Marie Fennell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

3.  What reading aloud reveals about speaking: Regressive saccades implicate a failure to monitor, not inattention, in the prevalence of intrusion errors on function words.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Chuchu Li; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.138

4.  Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Mark Yates; Timothy J Slattery
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2019-10-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.