Literature DB >> 31512087

Readers can identify the meanings of words without looking at them: Evidence from regressive eye movements.

Elizabeth R Schotter1, Anna Marie Fennell2.   

Abstract

Previewing words prior to fixating them leads to faster reading, but does it lead to word identification (i.e., semantic encoding)? We tested this with a gaze-contingent display change study and a subsequent plausibility manipulation. Both the preview and the target words were plausible when encountered, and we manipulated the end of the sentence so that the different preview was rendered implausible (in critical sentences) or remained plausible (in neutral sentences). Regressive saccades from the end of the sentence increased when the preview was rendered implausible compared to when it was plausible, especially when the preview was high frequency. These data add to a growing body of research suggesting that linguistic information can be obtained during preview, to the point where word meaning is accessed. In addition, these findings suggest that the meaning of the fixated target does not always override the semantic information obtained during preview.

Keywords:  Eye movements and reading; Reading; Word meaning; Word recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31512087     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01662-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; M Lesch; R K Morris; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Bernhard Angele; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.

Authors:  Sarah Risse; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control.

Authors:  J M Henderson; F Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Forced fixations, trans-saccadic integration, and word recognition: Evidence for a hybrid mechanism of saccade triggering in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Titus von der Malsburg; Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

9.  Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Klinton Bicknell; Ian Howard; Roger Levy; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-01-14

10.  Semantic and plausibility preview benefit effects in English: Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Annie Jia
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.