Literature DB >> 6238126

Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: evidence for parallel programming of saccades.

R E Morrison.   

Abstract

On-line eye movement recording of 12 subjects who read short stories on a cathode ray tube enabled a test of direct control and preprogramming models of eye movements in reading. Contingent upon eye position, a mask was displayed in place of the letters in central vision after each saccade, delaying the onset of the stimulus in each eye fixation. The duration of the delay was manipulated in fixed or randomized blocks. Although the length of the delay strongly affected the duration of the fixations, there was no difference due to the conditions of delay manipulation, indicating that fixation duration is under direct control. However, not all fixations were lengthened by the period of the delay. Some ended while the mask was still present, suggesting they had been preprogrammed. But these "anticipation" eye movements could not have been completely determined before the fixation was processed because their fixation durations and saccade lengths were affected by the spatial extent of the mask, which varied randomly. Neither preprogramming nor existing serial direct control models of eye guidance can adequately account for these data. Instead, a model with direct control and parallel programming of saccades is proposed to explain the data and eye movements in reading in general.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6238126     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  56 in total

1.  Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  J Wiley; K Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

2.  Letter detection in very familiar texts.

Authors:  S N Greenberg; J Tai
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-12

3.  Global context effects on processing lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye fixations.

Authors:  G Kambe; K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

4.  Sentential and discourse topic effects on lexical ambiguity processing: an eye movement examination.

Authors:  Katherine S Binder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-07

5.  Early morphological effects in reading: evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew.

Authors:  Avital Deutsch; Ram Frost; Sharon Pelleg; Alexander Pollatsek; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

6.  Effects of syntactic category assignment on lexical ambiguity resolution in reading: an eye movement analysis.

Authors:  Jocelyn R Folk; Robin K Morris
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

7.  Semantic processing of unattended text during selective reading: how the eyes see it.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; D Briihl
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-03

8.  Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Brianna M Eiter; Ralph Radach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Examining Eye Movements in Visual Search through Clusters of Objects in a Circular Array.

Authors:  Carrick C Williams; Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014

10.  Evidence for direct control of eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Michael Dambacher; Timothy J Slattery; Jinmian Yang; Reinhold Kliegl; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.