Literature DB >> 26322828

A further look at postview effects in reading: An eye-movements study of influences from the left of fixation.

Timothy R Jordan1, Victoria A McGowan2, Stoyan Kurtev2, Kevin B Paterson2.   

Abstract

When reading from left to right, useful information acquired during each fixational pause is widely assumed to extend 14 to 15 characters to the right of fixation but just 3 to 4 characters to the left, and certainly no further than the beginning of the fixated word. However, this leftward extent is strikingly small and seems inconsistent with other aspects of reading performance and with the general horizontal symmetry of visual input. Accordingly, 2 experiments were conducted to examine the influence of text located to the left of fixation during each fixational pause using an eye-tracking paradigm in which invisible boundaries were created in sentence displays. Each boundary corresponded to the leftmost edge of each word so that, as each sentence was read, the normal letter content of text to the left of each fixated word was corrupted by letter replacements that were either visually similar or visually dissimilar to the originals. The proximity of corrupted text to the left of fixation was maintained at 1, 2, 3, or 4 words from the left boundary of each fixated word. In both experiments, relative to completely normal text, reading performance was impaired when each type of letter replacement was up to 2 words to the left of fixated words but letter replacements further from fixation produced no impairment. These findings suggest that key aspects of reading are influenced by information acquired during each fixational pause from much further leftward than is usually assumed. Some of the implications of these findings for reading are discussed. (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26322828     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  8 in total

1.  The perceptual span in Tibetan reading.

Authors:  Aiping Wang; Ming Yan; Bei Wang; Gaoding Jia; Albrecht W Inhoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-03-26

2.  When your mind skips what your eyes fixate: How forced fixations lead to comprehension illusions in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Mallorie Leinenger; Titus von der Malsburg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

3.  Eye movements during text reading align with the rate of speech production.

Authors:  Benjamin Gagl; Klara Gregorova; Julius Golch; Stefan Hawelka; Jona Sassenhagen; Alessandro Tavano; David Poeppel; Christian J Fiebach
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-12-06

4.  Effects of Spatial Frequencies on Word Identification by Fast and Slow Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Jasmine Dixon; Victoria A McGowan; Stoyan Kurtev; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-28

5.  Aging and the optimal viewing position effect in visual word recognition: Evidence from English.

Authors:  Lin Li; Sha Li; Jingxin Wang; Victoria A McGowan; Pingping Liu; Timothy R Jordan; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2017-04-13

6.  Predictive modeling of parafoveal information processing during reading.

Authors:  Stefan Seelig; Sarah Risse; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Investigating the Effectiveness of Spatial Frequencies to the Left and Right of Central Vision during Reading: Evidence from Reading Times and Eye Movements.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Victoria A McGowan; Stoyan Kurtev; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-18

Review 8.  Effects of Normative Aging on Eye Movements during Reading.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Victoria A McGowan; Kayleigh L Warrington; Lin Li; Sha Li; Fang Xie; Min Chang; Sainan Zhao; Ascensión Pagán; Sarah J White; Jingxin Wang
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.