Literature DB >> 28766076

Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after middle and low rectal cancer resection without diverting stoma: a retrospective study of 319 consecutive patients.

Wei Zhang3, Zheng Lou1, Qizhi Liu1, Ronggui Meng1, Haifeng Gong1, Liqiang Hao1, Peng Liu1, Ge Sun1, Jun Ma1, Wei Zhang3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) after anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer in order to help surgeons to decide which patients could benefit from a diverting stoma.
METHODS: Data on 319 patients having a middle and low rectal cancer resection with anastomosis between May 2011 and October 2015 from two hospitals were included in the study. The analysis included the following variables: patient-related variables (gender, age, diabetes mellitus, ASA score, preoperative radiochemotherapy, body mass index, blood hemoglobin, and serum albumin level), tumor-related variables (K-ras status, distance of tumor from the anal verge, histopathologic grade, pathological T stage, pathological N stage, pathological M stage, TNM stage, and tumor size), and surgery-related variables (laparoscopic or open surgery, blood loss, and operative time). Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were carried out to identify risk factors for AL.
RESULTS: The AL rate was 11.91% (38/319). Male (OR 2.898, 95% CI 1.265-6.637, p = 0.012), diabetes mellitus (OR 2.482, 95% CI 1.004-6.134, p = 0.049), K-ras mutation (OR 2.544, 95% CI 1.210-5.348, p = 0.014), distance of tumor from the anal verge (OR 3.445, 95% CI 1.631-7.279, p = 0.001), and preoperative radiochemotherapy (OR 2.790, 95% CI 1.056-7.372, p = 0.039) were independent risk factors of AL. One (2.63%) in 38 patients with AL presented with no risk factor of AL, 6 (15.8%) in 38 patients with 1 risk factor, 16 (42.1%) in 38 patients with 2 risk factors, 9 (23.7%) in 38 patients with 3 risk factors, and 6 (15.7%) in 38 patients with 4 risk factors. No patient with 5 risk factors in our study. AL rate increased with the elevated number of risk factors clustering in individuals.
CONCLUSIONS: K-ras mutation is first reported to be an independent risk factor for AL after sphincter-preserving surgery without diverting stoma. A diverting stoma should be performed in sphincter-preserving surgery for middle and low rectal cancer patients with 2 or more risk factors identified in this analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leakage; Diverting stoma; K-ras; Rectal cancer; Risk factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28766076     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2875-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  14 in total

Review 1.  Is K-ras gene mutation a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  JiaoJiao Ren; GuangXiao Li; Jie Ge; Xia Li; YaShuang Zhao
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection: a retrospective analysis of 17 518 patients.

Authors:  M Parthasarathy; M Greensmith; D Bowers; T Groot-Wassink
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Intersphincteric Resection Without a Protective Defunctioning Stoma for Lower Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Motoi Koyama; Akihiko Murata; Yoshiyuki Sakamoto; Hajime Morohashi; Tatsuya Hasebe; Takeshi Saito; Kenichi Hakamada
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection and reconstruction with colorectostomy. A retrospective study with bootstrap analysis.

Authors:  Rene Warschkow; Thomas Steffen; Jutta Thierbach; Thomas Bruckner; Jochen Lange; Ignazio Tarantino
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Mirnezami; Reza Mirnezami; Kandiah Chandrakumaran; Kishore Sasapu; Peter Sagar; Paul Finan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Prognostic significance of K-Ras mutation rate in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Bruno Vincenzi; Chiara Cremolini; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Antonio Russo; Francesco Mannavola; Giuseppe Perrone; Francesco Pantano; Fotios Loupakis; Daniele Rossini; Elena Ongaro; Erica Bonazzina; Emanuela Dell'Aquila; Marco Imperatori; Alice Zoccoli; Giuseppe Bronte; Giovanna De Maglio; Gabriella Fontanini; Clara Natoli; Alfredo Falcone; Daniele Santini; Andrea Onetti-Muda; Salvatore Siena; Giuseppe Tonini; Giuseppe Aprile
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-13

Review 7.  K-Ras mutation and prognosis of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuanyi Rui; Cun Wang; Zongguang Zhou; Xi Zhong; Yongyang Yu
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

8.  Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  M den Dulk; C A M Marijnen; L Collette; H Putter; L Påhlman; J Folkesson; J-F Bosset; C Rödel; K Bujko; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Risk factors, short and long term outcome of anastomotic leaks in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Olof Jannasch; Tim Klinge; Ronny Otto; Costanza Chiapponi; Andrej Udelnow; Hans Lippert; Christiane J Bruns; Pawel Mroczkowski
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-11-03

Review 10.  Adverse Effects of Anastomotic Leakage on Local Recurrence and Survival After Curative Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shuanhu Wang; Jingjing Liu; Shan Wang; Hongyun Zhao; Sitang Ge; Wenbin Wang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  14 in total

1.  Ileostomy versus fecal diversion device to protect anastomosis after rectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sohyun Kim; Sang Hun Jung; Jae Hwang Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A Nomogram to Predict Anastomotic Leakage in Open Rectal Surgery-Hope or Hype?

Authors:  Johannes Klose; Ignazio Tarantino; Armin von Fournier; Moritz J Stowitzki; Yakup Kulu; Thomas Bruckner; Claudia Volz; Thomas Schmidt; Martin Schneider; Markus W Büchler; Alexis Ulrich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Operative blood loss adversely affects short and long-term outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  C Simillis; M Charalambides; A Mavrou; T Afxentiou; M P Powar; J Wheeler; R J Davies; N S Fearnhead
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.699

4.  The use of single-stapling techniques reduces anastomotic complications in minimal-invasive rectal surgery.

Authors:  Maximilian Brunner; Alaa Zu'bi; Klaus Weber; Axel Denz; Melanie Langheinrich; Stephan Kersting; Georg F Weber; Robert Grützmann; Christian Krautz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 5.  A systematic review of the literature assessing operative blood loss and postoperative outcomes after colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Maria Charalambides; Athina Mavrou; Thomas Jennings; Michael P Powar; James Wheeler; R Justin Davies; Nicola S Fearnhead; Constantinos Simillis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Surgical specimen extraction via a prophylactic ileostomy procedure: A minimally invasive technique for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Jian-Wei Liang; Hai-Tao Zhou; Zheng Wang; Zhi-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  The Clinical and Economic Burden of Colorectal Anastomotic Leaks: Middle-Income Country Perspective.

Authors:  Ulysses Ribeiro; Daiane O Tayar; Rodrigo A Ribeiro; Priscila Andrade; Silvio M Junqueira
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Near-infrared fluorescence image-guidance in anastomotic colorectal cancer surgery and its relation to serum markers of anastomotic leakage: a clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Jacqueline van den Bos; Audrey C H M Jongen; Jarno Melenhorst; Stéphanie O Breukink; Kaatje Lenaerts; Rutger M Schols; Nicole D Bouvy; Laurents P S Stassen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Machine learning-based random forest predicts anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Rongbo Wen; Kuo Zheng; Qihang Zhang; Leqi Zhou; Qizhi Liu; Guanyu Yu; Xianhua Gao; Liqiang Hao; Zheng Lou; Wei Zhang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-06

10.  Investigating Risk Factors for Complications after Ileostomy Reversal in Low Anterior Rectal Resection Patients: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Jan Witowski; Michał Wysocki; Magdalena Pisarska; Stanisław Kłęk; Andrzej Budzyński; Michał Pędziwiatr
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.