Literature DB >> 29777457

A Nomogram to Predict Anastomotic Leakage in Open Rectal Surgery-Hope or Hype?

Johannes Klose1, Ignazio Tarantino1, Armin von Fournier1, Moritz J Stowitzki1, Yakup Kulu1, Thomas Bruckner2, Claudia Volz1, Thomas Schmidt1, Martin Schneider1, Markus W Büchler1, Alexis Ulrich3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage is the most dreaded complication after rectal resection and total mesorectal excision, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Formation of a diverting ileostomy is generally performed to protect anastomotic healing. Identification of variables predicting anastomotic leakage might help to select patients who are under increased risk for the development of anastomotic leakage prior to surgery. The objective of this study was to assess the applicability of a nomogram as prognostic model for the occurrence of anastomotic leakage after rectal resection in a cohort of rectal cancer patients.
METHODS: Nine hundred seventy-two consecutive patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to determine independent risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and overall model correctness of a recently published nomogram and an adopted risk score based on the variables identified in this study as a predictive model.
RESULTS: Male sex (p = 0.042), obesity (p = 0.017), smoking (p = 0.012), postoperative bleeding (p = 0.024), and total protein level ≤ 5.6 g/dl (p = 0.007) were identified as independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage. The investigated nomogram and the adopted risk score failed to reach relevant areas under the ROC curve greater than 0.700 for the prediction of anastomotic leakage.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed nomogram and the adopted risk score failed to reliably predict the occurrence of anastomotic leakage after rectal resection. Risk scores as prognostic models for the prediction of anastomotic leakage, independently of the study population, still need to be identified.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leakage; Rectal cancer; Rectal resection; Risk score validation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29777457     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3782-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  39 in total

1.  Prognostic nutritional index predicts postoperative outcome in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Mohri; Yasuhiro Inoue; Koji Tanaka; Junichirou Hiro; Keiichi Uchida; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Impact of obesity on surgical outcomes after colorectal resection.

Authors:  S Benoist; Y Panis; A Alves; P Valleur
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Stacey A Fedewa; Dennis J Ahnen; Reinier G S Meester; Afsaneh Barzi; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients.

Authors:  A Vignali; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J W Milsom; J M Church; T L Hull; S A Strong; J R Oakley
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection and reconstruction with colorectostomy. A retrospective study with bootstrap analysis.

Authors:  Rene Warschkow; Thomas Steffen; Jutta Thierbach; Thomas Bruckner; Jochen Lange; Ignazio Tarantino
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer.

Authors:  K C M J Peeters; R A E M Tollenaar; C A M Marijnen; E Klein Kranenbarg; W H Steup; T Wiggers; H J Rutten; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Morbidity and complications of protective loop ileostomy.

Authors:  G F Giannakopoulos; A A F A Veenhof; D L van der Peet; C Sietses; W J H J Meijerink; M A Cuesta
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Norbert Hüser; Christoph W Michalski; Mert Erkan; Tibor Schuster; Robert Rosenberg; Jörg Kleeff; Helmut Friess
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients.

Authors:  Koianka Trencheva; Kevin P Morrissey; Martin Wells; Carol A Mancuso; Sang W Lee; Toyooki Sonoda; Fabrizio Michelassi; Mary E Charlson; Jeffrey W Milsom
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Risk scores as useful predictors of perioperative complications in patients with rectal cancer who received radical surgery.

Authors:  Hiroshi Miyakita; Sotaro Sadahiro; Gota Saito; Kazutake Okada; Akira Tanaka; Toshiyuki Suzuki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  4 in total

1.  Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial).

Authors:  Jennifer Park; Eva Angenete; David Bock; Adiela Correa-Marinez; Anne K Danielsen; Jacob Gehrman; Eva Haglind; Jens E Jansen; Stefan Skullman; Anette Wedin; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A preoperative prediction model based on Lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio predicts postoperative anastomotic leakage in patients with colorectal carcinoma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Bin Zhong; Zhen-Yu Lin; Dan-Dan Ma; Zuo-Hong Shang; Yan-Bin Shen; Tao Zhang; Jian-Xin Zhang; Wei-Dong Jin
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 2.030

3.  Conventional regression analysis and machine learning in prediction of anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications after esophagogastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Robert T van Kooten; Renu R Bahadoer; Bouwdewijn Ter Buurkes de Vries; Michel W J M Wouters; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Henk H Hartgrink; Hein Putter; Johan L Dikken
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.885

4.  Machine learning-based random forest predicts anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Rongbo Wen; Kuo Zheng; Qihang Zhang; Leqi Zhou; Qizhi Liu; Guanyu Yu; Xianhua Gao; Liqiang Hao; Zheng Lou; Wei Zhang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.