Literature DB >> 34295545

Machine learning-based random forest predicts anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Rongbo Wen1, Kuo Zheng1, Qihang Zhang2, Leqi Zhou1, Qizhi Liu1, Guanyu Yu1, Xianhua Gao1, Liqiang Hao1, Zheng Lou1, Wei Zhang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the commonest and most serious complications after rectal cancer surgery. The previous analyses on predictors for AL included small-scale patients, and their prediction models performed unsatisfactorily.
METHODS: Clinical data of 5,220 patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer were scrutinized to create a prediction model via random forest classifier. Additionally, data of 836 patients served as the test dataset. Patients diagnosed with AL within 6 months' follow-up were recorded. A total of 20 candidate factors were included. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was conducted to determine the clinical efficacy of our model, and compare the predictive performance of different models.
RESULTS: The incidence of AL was 6.2% (326/5,220). A multivariate logistic regression analysis and the random forest classifier indicated that sex, distance of tumor from the anal verge, bowel stenosis or obstruction, preoperative hemoglobin, surgeon volume, diabetes, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and surgical approach were significantly associated with AL. After propensity score matching, the temporary stoma was not identified as a protective factor for AL (P=0.58). Contrastingly, the first year of performing laparoscopic surgery was a predictor (P=0.009). We created a predictive random forest classifier based on the above predictors that demonstrated satisfactory prediction efficacy. The area under the curve (AUC) showed that the random forest had higher efficiency (AUC =0.87) than the nomogram (AUC =0.724).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that eight factors may affect the incidence of AL. Our random forest classifier is an innovative and practical model to effectively predict AL, and could provide rational advice on whether to perform a temporary stoma, which might reduce the rate of stoma and avoid the ensuing complications. 2021 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leakage (AL); machine learning; nomogram; random forest; rectal cancer; risk factor

Year:  2021        PMID: 34295545      PMCID: PMC8261311          DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  32 in total

1.  Learning curve for standardized laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer under supervision: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masashi Ueno; Masatoshi Oya; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Clinical Anastomotic Leakage After Rectal Cancer Resection Can Be Predicted by Pelvic Anatomic Features on Preoperative MRI Scans: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Tenghui Ma; Qinghua Zhong; Wuteng Cao; Qiyuan Qin; Xiaochun Meng; HuaiMing Wang; Jianping Wang; Lei Wang
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Establishment of Best Practices for Evidence for Prediction: A Review.

Authors:  Russell A Poldrack; Grace Huckins; Gael Varoquaux
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 21.596

4.  Clinical manifestations and risk factors of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jung-A Yun; Yong Beom Cho; Yoon Ah Park; Jung Wook Huh; Seong Hyeon Yun; Hee Cheol Kim; Woo Yong Lee; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 1.872

5.  Predictors of Anastomotic Leak in Elderly Patients After Colectomy: Nomogram-Based Assessment From the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Program Procedure-Targeted Cohort.

Authors:  Ahmet Rencuzogullari; Cigdem Benlice; Michael Valente; Maher A Abbas; Feza H Remzi; Emre Gorgun
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Classification of lung cancer using ensemble-based feature selection and machine learning methods.

Authors:  Zhihua Cai; Dong Xu; Qing Zhang; Jiexia Zhang; Sai-Ming Ngai; Jianlin Shao
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2014-12-16

7.  Achieving low anastomotic leak rates utilizing clinical perfusion assessment.

Authors:  Jacob Kream; Kirk A Ludwig; Timothy J Ridolfi; Carrie Y Peterson
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Nomogram for predicting anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Nobuaki Hoshino; Koya Hida; Yoshiharu Sakai; Shunichi Osada; Hitoshi Idani; Toshihiko Sato; Yasumasa Takii; Hiroyuki Bando; Akio Shiomi; Norio Saito
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after middle and low rectal cancer resection without diverting stoma: a retrospective study of 319 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Zheng Lou; Qizhi Liu; Ronggui Meng; Haifeng Gong; Liqiang Hao; Peng Liu; Ge Sun; Jun Ma; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Robustness of Random Forest-based gene selection methods.

Authors:  Miron Bartosz Kursa
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Outcomes after Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mustafa Bektaş; Jurriaan B Tuynman; Jaime Costa Pereira; George L Burchell; Donald L van der Peet
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  A Predictive Model for Qualitative Evaluation of PG-SGA in Tumor Patients Through Machine Learning.

Authors:  Xiangliang Liu; Yuguang Li; Wei Ji; Kaiwen Zheng; Jin Lu; Yixin Zhao; Wenxin Zhang; Mingyang Liu; Jiuwei Cui; Wei Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.602

3.  Ostomy Does Not Lead to Worse Outcomes After Bowel Resection With Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xinlin He; Zhengyu Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Efficacy Analysis of Team-Based Nursing Compliance in Young and Middle-Aged Diabetes Mellitus Patients Based on Random Forest Algorithm and Logistic Regression.

Authors:  Dongni Qian; Hong Gao
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 2.809

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.