Literature DB >> 19672927

Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.

M den Dulk1, C A M Marijnen, L Collette, H Putter, L Påhlman, J Folkesson, J-F Bosset, C Rödel, K Bujko, C J H van de Velde.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The association between diverting stomas and symptomatic anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery was studied, as well as the impact of leakage on local recurrence, distant metastasis, and disease-free, overall and cancer-specific survival.
METHODS: Data from the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial, Dutch TME trial, CAO/ARO/AIO-94 trial, EORTC 22921 trial and Polish Rectal Cancer Trial were pooled (n = 5187). All eligible patients without distant metastases at the time of low anterior resection were selected (n = 2726); overall survival was studied in patients aged 75 years or less (n = 2480). Multivariable models were used to study the association between diverting stomas and anastomotic leakage, and between leakage and recurrence or survival.
RESULTS: Some 9.7 per cent of patients were diagnosed with a symptomatic anastomotic leak; diverting stomas were negatively associated with leakage (11.6 per cent without and 7.8 per cent with a stoma; P = 0.002). Anastomotic leakage was negatively associated with overall survival in the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio (HR) 1.29 (95 per cent confidence interval 1.02 to 1.63); P = 0.034), but not with cancer-specific survival (HR 1.12 (0.83 to 1.52); P = 0.466).
CONCLUSION: Diverting stomas were associated with less symptomatic anastomotic leakage. Oncological outcome was not significantly influenced by leakage, but overall survival was reduced. (c) 2009 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19672927     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  73 in total

Review 1.  Oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  I Mantzoros
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Endoscopic intraoperative anastomotic testing may avoid early gastrointestinal anastomotic complications. A prospective study.

Authors:  Eva Lieto; Michele Orditura; Paolo Castellano; Margherita Pinto; Anna Zamboli; Ferdinando De Vita; Carlo Pignatelli; Gennaro Galizia
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  [Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival in mid-to-low rectal cancer].

Authors:  T Jäger; C Nawara; D Neureiter; J Holzinger; D Öfner-Velano; A Dinnewitzer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  The influence of fecal diversion and anastomotic leakage on survival after resection of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jen-Kou Lin; Te-Cheng Yueh; Shih-Ching Chang; Chun-Chi Lin; Yuan-Tzu Lan; Huann-Sheng Wang; Shung-Haur Yang; Jeng-Kai Jiang; Wei-Shone Chen; Tzu-Chen Lin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Real-time intraoperative detection of tissue hypoxia in gastrointestinal surgery by wireless pulse oximetry.

Authors:  Elliot L Servais; Nabil P Rizk; Luiz Oliveira; Valerie W Rusch; Marom Bikson; Prasad S Adusumilli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Peritoneo-fascial suture methods for facilitating loop ileostomy mobilization.

Authors:  Samir Johna
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Influence of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  In Ja Park
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Little consensus in either definition or diagnosis of a lower gastro-intestinal anastomotic leak amongst colorectal surgeons.

Authors:  K Adams; S Papagrigoriadis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Peri-operative bowel perforation in early stage colon cancer is associated with an adverse oncological outcome.

Authors:  E J T Belt; H B A C Stockmann; G S A Abis; J M de Boer; E S M de Lange-de Klerk; M van Egmond; G A Meijer; S J Oosterling
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Prophylactic transanal decompression tube versus non-prophylactic transanal decompression tube for anastomotic leakage prevention in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun Yang; Ye Shu; Fangyu Su; Lin Xia; Baofeng Duan; Xiaoting Wu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.