Literature DB >> 28765404

Evaluation of feedback given to trainees in medical specialties.

Tony Ck Tham1, Bill Burr2, Mairead Boohan3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of feedback provided to specialty trainees (ST3 or higher) in medical specialties during their workplace-based assessments (WBAs). The feedback given in WBAs was examined in detail in a group of 50 ST3 or higher trainees randomly selected from those taking part in a pilot study of changes to the WBA system conducted by the Joint Royal Colleges of Physicians Training Board. They were based in Health Education Northeast (Northern Deanery) and Health Education East of England (Eastern Deanery). Thematic analysis was used to identify commonly occurring themes. Feedback was mainly positive but there were differences in quality between specialties. Problems with feedback included insufficient detail, such that it was not possible to map the progression of the trainee, insufficient action plans made and the timing of feedback not being contemporaneous (feedback not being given at the time of assessment). Recommendations included feedback should be more specific; there need to be more options in the feedback forms for the supervisor to compare the trainee's performance to what is expected and action plans need to be made. © Royal College of Physicians 2017. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessments; feedback; medical specialties; quality; supervision; thematic analysis trainees; workplace

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28765404      PMCID: PMC6297643          DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-4-303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  10 in total

1.  Developing the teaching instinct, 1: feedback.

Authors:  E A Hesketh; J M Laidlaw
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  Workplace-based assessments of junior doctors: do scores predict training difficulties?

Authors:  Colin Mitchell; Sarita Bhat; Anne Herbert; Paul Baker
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  A faculty development program evaluation: from needs assessment to long-term effects, of the teaching skills improvement program.

Authors:  Sevkat Bahar-Ozvaris; Dilek Aslan; Nalan Sahin-Hodoglugil; Iskender Sayek
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.414

4.  Formative assessment: a key to deep learning?

Authors:  Alison Rushton
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  James R Wilkinson; James G M Crossley; Andrew Wragg; Peter Mills; George Cowan; Winnie Wade
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 6.  Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31.

Authors:  John Norcini; Vanessa Burch
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  Lessons learnt from a pilot of assessment for learning.

Authors:  Siu Pan Cho; David Parry; Winnie Wade
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.659

8.  Effects of training in direct observation of medical residents' clinical competence: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Richard E Hawkins; Stephen J Huot
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7.

Authors:  Jon Veloski; James R Boex; Margaret J Grasberger; Adam Evans; Daniel B Wolfson
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 10.  The role of feedback in improving the effectiveness of workplace based assessments: a systematic review.

Authors:  Habiba Saedon; Shizalia Salleh; Arun Balakrishnan; Christopher H E Imray; Mahmud Saedon
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.463

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  The ageing population in healthcare: a challenge to, and in, the workforce.

Authors:  Ed Nicol
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.659

2.  Development of a GMC aligned curriculum for internal medicine including a qualitative study of the acceptability of 'capabilities in practice' as a curriculum model.

Authors:  Shuaib Quraishi; Winnie Wade; David Black
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2019-10

3.  The ePortfolio in UK cardiology training: time for a new digital platform?

Authors:  Ahmed Elamin; Mohammed Obeidat; Gershan Davis
Journal:  Br J Cardiol       Date:  2021-07-14

4.  Higher medical training in Rheumatology in the UK: any lessons worth learning?

Authors:  Andrew Hassell
Journal:  Mediterr J Rheumatol       Date:  2017-12-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.