Literature DB >> 25468839

Lessons learnt from a pilot of assessment for learning.

Siu Pan Cho1, David Parry1, Winnie Wade2.   

Abstract

A 12-month pilot was carried out on assessments for learning and assessments of learning as part of workplace-based assessments in postgraduate medical education. This was carried out in three regions and core medical trainees and higher specialty medical trainees participated. Focus groups and questionnaires were utilised to investigate the trainees' and trainers' experiences and perceptions of assessments for learning. The study demonstrated that the trainees and trainers perceived the newly introduced assessments for learning--supervised learning events (SLEs)--as learning tools. However, SLEs were often undertaken with no previous organisation and with no direct observation, regardless of the underlying purposes and methods of the WPBAs. There was a lack of, or delayed or non-specific, feedback following SLEs, which would have impeded its educational value. Trainee and trainer disengagement was one of the contributing factors. These findings are valuable in informing and facilitating future successful implementation of assessments for learning.
© 2014 Royal College of Physicians.

Keywords:  Workplace-based assessment; assessment for learning; feedback; supervised learning events

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25468839      PMCID: PMC4954126          DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-6-577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of feedback given to trainees in medical specialties.

Authors:  Tony Ck Tham; Bill Burr; Mairead Boohan
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 2.  Assessing professional competence: a critical review of the Annual Review of Competence Progression.

Authors:  Katherine Woolf; Michael Page; Rowena Viney
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 18.000

3.  Self-regulated learning lens on trainee perceptions of the mini-CEX: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Eva Kipen; Eleanor Flynn; Robyn Woodward-Kron
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.